Making AI part of everyday life | Lawyer & Dad of two | An ordinary person's take on AI, with the internet's hottest AI stories explained in plain words
Over the past couple of years, I've become convinced of one thing: AI isn't just a tech-world thing anymore. It's walking into ordinary homes. Kids' homework, grown-ups' jobs, small-town shops: it's all changing.
So I started my AI Notebook. Here's what I do:
① Every day, I pick the hottest AI stories from around the world and explain, in plain words, why they matter to people like us
② I share my own real experience using AI, fails included
Curious about AI but not a tech person? Follow along. We'll figure it out together.
This is the most useful prompt I've found in months. I've been using it with Opus 5.5 as a skill called /better to great effect. Grab it here: https://t.co/owQGz21OR7
Here's how it's really stretches the model's performance vs usual prompts:
1. The "what a top professional in the field would do" somehow reminds the model to think of a lot of stuff it wouldn't otherwise do, and (unless this is your core area of expertise), you wouldn't know either.
Obviously Claude/Codex always knows the best practices already, but often it needs reminding to use them (despite it being in the training data), so this helps.
2. Rawest material - models love using proxies for stuff (e.g. Claude sampling logs instead of reading them); so telling them to use rawest materials helps them go back to primary sources/think from first principles, avoiding a lot of problems that come from lazy models and the resulting indirection.
4. Designing independent success criteria: important for the model to know how to actually work; and forcing it to define them means you get better and stronger results vs just letting it vibe stuff. The risk here is that you end up with "proof porn" - think endless hashing or comparisons without testing the real result - all frontier models as of Oct 2026 (Astra 6/Sol 6.1/Opus 5.5/Fable 5.1) all love doing this, so keep an eye on them.
"I might be one of them," says the guy building one.
As a dad, this is the AI risk I actually think about. Not robots. My kids asking a chatbot for advice and finding it more convincing than me.
One habit I want them to learn: if AI talks you into something big, check with a real person first.
My AI said "no one talks in this footage."
I put on headphones. My kid and I were chatting in almost every clip. It was the best part of the trip. https://t.co/VUPpcqiZMV
Claude now writes about 90% of the code behind Claude Code, according to Anthropic's own dev team.
And quality didn't drop. From June to September, merged code changes more than doubled, while the share that had to be rolled back fell by over 40%.
My non-programmer takeaway: the human job is shifting from writing code to checking it.
That's the skill I want my kids to learn. Not just how to make things, but how to tell whether what AI made is actually right.
Claude writes about 90% of Claude Code's code.
From June to September, merged PRs more than doubled while the share reverted fell by more than 40%.
We wrote about how we changed code review to get there, and how to adopt it:
https://t.co/9sZe64g3mb
Every family has that one person who fixes the TV for mom and dad. This guy handed the job to AI.
His parents' TV showed a sponsored ad before you could even get to Netflix. So he gave Claude Code the model number. It found the TV on the Wi-Fi, removed 25 Xiaomi packages, and wrote a brand-new home screen.
What gets me: this isn't really coding anymore. It's a household chore.
One caution if you're tempted to try this on your own parents' TV: letting an AI delete system apps can break things. Make sure you know what it's removing.
Vibe coded my parents' TV this afternoon!
It was showing a sponsored ad before you could even get to Netflix.
Gave Claude Code the model number, it found the TV on wifi, removed 25 Xiaomi packages and wrote a new launcher.
Looks like an Apple TV now lol