Uğur Tatlı

Başarı, karakterle birleşmezse topluma zarar verir #emeksavunucusu #teslimolmakyok

[Uğur Tatlı @ugurtatli1923]

@LeCimbombom @ilhanuzgel @zgdekli Evet sorunlarımız vardır ama bu Türkiye'nin ciddi bir güç olduğu gerçeğini değiştirmez bu bölgede güç değilsen seni yerler . Bu arada bu hükümete muhalif bir insanım hatta muhalefede muhalifim bu benim gerçekleri söylememe engel değil.

[Uğur Tatlı @ugurtatli1923]

Avrupa Birliği’nin geleceği büyük bir soru işareti. Kendi ulusal çıkarlarını korumak isteyen akıllı devletler, eninde sonunda bu hantal birlikteliği sürdürmek istemeyecektir.

​Neden mi?

📌 Egemenlik Kaybı: Brüksel'in dayatmaları ulusal çıkarlarla çatışıyor.

📌 Ekonomik Fatura: Güçlü ekonomiler, zayıf üyeleri sırtlamaktan yoruldu.

📌 Karar Alamama: Değişen dünyada AB'nin hantal yapısı devletlerin hızını kesiyor.

​Çıkarlar bittiğinde, ortaklıklar da biter. Brexit sadece bir başlangıçtı.

[Uğur Tatlı @ugurtatli1923]

Bak sen şu "aydınlanmaya"! Atina ve Brüksel yıllar süren derin uykusundan uyanmış, nihayet malumu ilam etmiş.

​Yıllarca "Türkiye reform yapıyor, modernleşiyor" diye kendi kendinizi avuturken, Ankara’nın sizin o meşhur "Avrupa değerleri" dediğiniz, ama mülteci krizinde veya küresel adaletsizliklerde nasıl kolayca rafa kaldırdığınızı gördüğümüz çifte standartlı ilkelerinize zaten hiç bayılmadığını anlamanız çeyrek asır sürmüş. Günaydın!

​Yine de yiğidi öldürüp hakkını yemeyelim; yazdığın o kadar ajitasyon ve ağlama duvarı kıvamındaki metnin içinde tek bir doğru var: Türkiye gerçekten de artık AB’ye girmeyi falan zerre önemsemiyor.
​Yıllarca kapıda oyalayıp, her fırsatta siyasi ambargolar uygulayıp, sonra da "Biz bunu dondurduk" demek tam bir Brüksel tiyatrosu. Türkiye, kendi eksenini çizen, bölgesel bir güç merkezi olarak kendi oyununu kuran bir devlet. Sizin "istatistik memuru" gibi raporlar yazıp parmak sallamanız Ankara’nın umurunda bile değil.
​"Doğu Akdeniz’de ve Orta Doğu’da sorun çıkarıyor" dediğin şey ise, Türkiye’nin kendi kıta sahanlığını, çıkarlarını ve sınır güvenliğini sizin emperyalist hayallerinize meze etmemesidir. Kusura bakmayın, eski edilgen Türkiye yok. Siz Brüksel’de "kınama mektupları" yazıp birbirinizi ağırlamaya devam edin, Ankara kendi yolunu çoktan çizdi.

[Uğur Tatlı @ugurtatli1923]

CHP sadece üyelerine veya yöneticilerine ait dar bir mülk değil; tüm Türk milletine emanet edilmiş tarihsel bir mirastır! 🇹🇷
​📌 Kişisel Hırslar ve Kaybedilen Seçimler: Siyasette liderlik hırsının ülkenin geleceğinin önüne geçmesinin en ağır faturasını 2023 seçimlerinde ödedik. Toplumun her kesiminden fire vermeden oy alabilecek Mansur Yavaş gibi güçlü alternatifler varken, "İllaki ben aday olacağım" dayatmasıyla kazanılacak bir seçim göz göre göre kaybedildi.
​📌 Operasyonlar ve Tesadüfler Zinciri: Partinin yönetim kronolojisine baktığımızda ortada göz ardı edilemeyecek bir tablo var: Deniz Baykal’ın kaset komplosuyla başlayan süreç, bugün yaşanan "mutlak butlan" krizleri ve her kritik dönemeçteki adaylık dayatmaları... Tüm bu sürecin bir rastlantı olduğuna inanmak için ya kör cahil, ya kişisel menfaat sahibi ya da saf olmak gerekir.
​📌 Miras Tabela Değil, Felsefedir: İşte bu yüzden asıl miras kurumsal bir isim veya koltuktan ibaret değildir; miras kurucu felsefe, 6 Ok’un dinamik doktrinleri ve Atatürk’ün ilerici fikirleridir. Eğer mevcut yapı bu operasyonlarla kendi içine hapsolup fikirlerin içini boşaltırsa, o felsefeyi hakkıyla taşıyan yeni bir hareket seçmen nezdinde "mirasın gerçek sahibi" olur.
​📌 "Kemik Oy" Efsanesinin Sonu: CHP’nin kemik bir tabanı olduğu doğru; ancak kişisel hırslarla yıpratılan kurumsal logonun hatırı tek başına iktidara yetmiyor. Günümüz seçmeni geçmişin hatırasına değil, "iktidar alternatifi üretebilme kapasitesine" ve toplumsal değişime oy veriyor.
​⚖️ Siyasette asıl güç tabela veya koltuk değil, milletin güvenini kazanacak vizyondur. Statükonun ve şahsi hırsların esiri olan yapılar, değişim rüzgarı doğru kadrolarla birleştiğinde sandıkta her zaman tasfiye olmaya mahkumdur.

[Uğur Tatlı @ugurtatli1923]

@Mish_K_ We buried the century-old plot into the Mediterranean in 1974! Cyprus is Turkish; the North has been the fortress of freedom for 52 years, while the South is the ultimate address of the invaders!

[Uğur Tatlı @ugurtatli1923]

İslam’a saldırı mı diyorsun? Hiç alakası yok! Asıl saldırıyı, kendine "Müslüman" deyip şeref ve onur yoksunu olanlar yapıyor. Ne güzel dünya değil mi? İslam’ı kendine kalkan yap, o kalkanın arkasına saklanarak yapmadığın pislik kalmasın; sonra da "İslam’a saldırıyorlar!" diye ağla. Asıl eleştirilmesi gereken, dini kendi pisliklerine kılıf eden bu zihniyetin ta kendisidir.
​Müslümanlığa İslamiyet'e hiç bir şey olmuyor; sizin maskeleriniz düşüyor diye ödünüz patlıyor. Kalkanınız sağlam olabilir ama altındaki çürümüşlüğü gizlemeye yetmiyor, haberiniz olsun.

[Uğur Tatlı @ugurtatli1923]

"Ekonomik krizler, ABD ve İngiltere hakimiyeti."
Ekonomik kriz 2018 yılından bu tarafa devam ediyor.
ABD Hiç bir yetkisi olmadan başkanı ile görüşen tek insan.
İngiltere merkezli finans kuruluşlarına olan borçları da unutmayalım.
Ben bu söylemi pek anlayamadım zaten siyasi iktidar ekonomik anlamda zaten hakimiyeti kaptırmış. Ekonomik anlamda daha kötüsü olmaz,ekonomik bağımsızlıkta bir ülkenin doğrudan bağımsızlığı ile ilgilidir.Şu desen çok farklı olurdu seni destekledim neyi değiştirecekler.Birde klik meselesi var.Deniz Baykal'ın partiden uzaklaştırılma şekline bir bak,birde şimdi tekrar dönüşüne bak klik kim anlarsın.

[Uğur Tatlı @ugurtatli1923]

Thank you for this conversation. We don't have to agree. I may have used harsh or sarcastic language at times. This was simply to defend my country in the best way possible; it has nothing to do with you. I won't say I respect your opinions; for me, opinions are a matter of debate. This is not about your personality.

[Uğur Tatlı @ugurtatli1923]

Greece’s double standard in its Aegean policies is exactly this: "The law that benefits me is right; the law that doesn't is wrong!"

​If you stand before me and say, "Turkey is not a party to the 1947 Paris Peace Treaty, so the demilitarization clause of the Dodecanese Islands does not concern Turkey," then you must also find it completely justified and correct for Turkey to refuse to recognize the rules of UNCLOS (UN Convention on the Law of the Sea)—to which it is not a member—and to do as it pleases in the Aegean!

​The law is not an open buffet; you cannot just pick the articles that suit you and ignore the ones that don't.

​1️⃣ In international law, there is a rule known as the "Objective Status." The 1947 Paris Treaty (Art. 14) ceded the islands to Greece "on the condition that they remain demilitarized." This regime protects the security of the region and directly concerns Turkey as a coastal state. The transfer of sovereignty cannot be detached from this condition.

​2️⃣ Even UNCLOS (Art. 311) prioritizes prior special treaties regarding boundaries and status over itself.

​In short: You are going to use a treaty we are not a party to as an excuse to militarize the islands, and at the same time, try to lecture Turkey based on UNCLOS, to which we are also not a party? This "only when it suits you" logic does not fly in international law!

[Uğur Tatlı @ugurtatli1923]

You say, 'Only 4 islets were restricted in Lausanne, the 1947 Paris Treaty doesn't bind Turkey anyway, and there is no such thing as "conditional sovereignty" in international law.' You have a magnificent imagination, but reality might hurt a bit:

​1️⃣ Your 'Only 4 islands' myth is busted: You probably read Lausanne only from the table of contents at the back. Article 12 exactly approves the former demilitarization treaties covering the Eastern Aegean islands in general. Article 13 explicitly bans bases and fortifications on Lesbos, Chios, Samos, and Ikaria. On top of that, add Lemnos and Samothrace via the Lausanne Straits Convention. In other words, we choked the entire Aegean with military restrictions, and you are still saying 'just 4 tiny ones.' Don't make me laugh.

​2️⃣ Let's come to your brilliant 'The Paris Treaty doesn't bind you' defense: Have you ever heard of 'Objective Status' in international law? Probably not. The Treaty of Lausanne established the Turkish-Greek balance in the Aegean with a single red line: 'The islands will remain demilitarized for the security of Turkey.' (The Reason)

​This is exactly why, while transferring those Dodecanese islands to Greece in the 1947 Paris Peace Treaty, Italy could not violate this geographical balance established by Lausanne, and quietly added the command 'They shall remain demilitarized' to Article 14 of the treaty. (The Result) In other words, the Paris Treaty is a direct fruit of the demilitarization principle in Lausanne.

​3️⃣ Did you say 'There is no conditional sovereignty'? Don't make me laugh!

​There absolutely is conditional transfer of sovereignty in international law. The sovereignty of a territory can be transferred on the condition of not threatening the security of another state. Greece did not receive those islands with the logic of 'Take them and use them as military bases as you wish'; it received them on the condition that 'You will not threaten Türkiye right under its nose, and you will keep these places demilitarized.'

​Receiving sovereignty under this vital condition and then piling missiles on the island while saying 'I will militarize this place, you aren't a signatory anyway, and sovereignty cannot be conditional' is pure Eastern cunning.

​I'm sorry, but if the deed to the island right under our nose was given to you 'under a specific condition' and you violate that very condition, this situation absolutely concerns us. The law is clear: If you break the most fundamental condition of the contract, the day will come when the sovereignty rights of those islands come to the table, and their ownership is opened to debate.

​Now go back and reread the treaty texts and international public law from scratch so you don't embarrass yourselves around here! 🇹🇷📚

[Uğur Tatlı @ugurtatli1923]

Whenever Athens faces a bilateral issue with Turkey, instead of sitting down at the table with its own arguments, it hides behind US bases, French fighter jets, and EU sanction threats. Incapable of being a regional heavyweight through its own military or economic power, Athens has enthusiastically auditioned for the role of the West's "forward outpost" in the Eastern Mediterranean. Alliance requires equality; but you can hardly call yourself "independent" when your foreign policy is entirely on life support, waiting for a green light from Washington and Brussels.

​Turkey has proven time and again that it has zero interest in anyone else’s territory. However, it will never tolerate heavy weapons being illegally stacked on islands right under its nose, aimed directly at its heart. Playing the professional victim while flipping the facts upside down won't change the reality of Greece's illegal militarization in the Aegean.

[Uğur Tatlı @ugurtatli1923]

Greece’s sovereignty over the Aegean islands is directly and inextricably linked to these islands remaining demilitarized. Trying to distort this crystal-clear fact is nothing short of a blatant disregard for international law. The demilitarization clauses in the 1923 Lausanne and 1947 Paris Peace Treaties weren’t just temporary "security cushions"; they were—and still are—the foundational, non-negotiable prerequisites for peace in the region.

​In international law, treaties are a package deal—you don't get to cherry-pick the parts you like. Turkey transferred the sovereignty of these islands to Greece on the explicit, absolute condition that they would not be militarized and would pose no threat to Anatolian security. Articles 12 and 13 of the Lausanne Treaty and Article 14 of the Paris Treaty clearly dictate this demilitarized status. Violating the condition fundamentally puts the right of ownership under a legal question mark. To put it in simpler terms: you can’t violate the terms of your lease and then boldly claim, "Well, the house is mine now, I’ll do whatever I want." International law doesn't work that way.

​Article 51 of the UN Charter grants the right to self-defense only "if an armed attack occurs." Violating international treaties based on a subjective, paranoid "what if they attack us in the future" scenario—while there is absolutely no Turkish military aggression—is a legal joke. Greece is simply trying to use legal jargon as a flimsy fig leaf to cover up its treaty violations.

​Let’s check the timeline: Turkey’s Aegean Army was established in 1975 as a pure defense reflex, well after Greece illegally started militarizing the islands in the 1960s. So no, Turkey isn't the root cause here; Greece is. Turkey’s warning of "We might come suddenly one night" is not an invasion blueprint. It is a very sharp, very necessary red line drawn against illegal military bases and offensive weapons planted right under its nose.

​Sure, Turkey’s battle with inflation is a well-known fact. But let’s not pretend Greece wouldn't be a completely bankrupt state today if it weren't for the billions of euros in EU bailouts and debt-wiping operations. Even now, Greece is drowning in debt at over 160% of its GDP. Every single summer, the Greek press itself writes extensively about how local island shopkeepers practically survive on the cash injected by Turkish tourists flocking to the islands thanks to eased visa schemes. Talk about biting the hand that feeds you.

​Distorting the Cyprus issue by calling it a "50-year occupation" is a masterclass in historical ignorance. In 1960, a bi-communal, independent partnership state based on the equal partnership of Turkish and Greek Cypriots was established. Yet, fueled by the romantic dream of annexing the island to Greece (Enosis), Greek Cypriots illegally tore up the constitution in 1963, driving Turkish officials out of the government at gunpoint. Turkish Cypriots were reduced to a minority in their own state, forced into ghettos, and systematically massacred under ethnic cleansing blueprints like the Akritas Plan. Turkey intervened in 1974 using its legal rights and responsibilities explicitly granted by the Treaty of Guarantee. The goal was to stop the horrific massacres of Turkish Cypriots by the EOKA terrorist group—backed by the Greek military junta—and to prevent the island from being swallowed whole by Greece. Turkey is not an occupier; it is the sole guarantor power that brought peace and protected the Turkish presence under international law.++⬇️

[Uğur Tatlı @ugurtatli1923]

Twisting international law by cherry-picking only the clauses that suit you, while completely ignoring the "demilitarized status" which was the most fundamental condition for the transfer of the islands' sovereignty, is nothing but a "cosmetic" approach. Fabricating and hiding behind Article 51 of the UN Charter just to package your own rule violations does not change this reality.

​There is no invasion plan or panic as you claim; on the contrary, Turkey just laughs at these artificial fear scenarios you create and your aggressive posture that constantly seeks refuge behind the West because you cannot stand on your own two feet. We are not a nation that turns historical baggage into agitation material or chases after war. Today, our children go to your islands merely for vacation, to enjoy themselves with their own money, and to keep your fragile economy—which your own government fails to manage—afloat.

​Since you know you are nothing on your own, you have turned crying at the doors of NATO and the EU into a state policy. As a weak nation that has tied even its own defense to the mercy of others, we understand your complex in the face of a deeply rooted military genius. Drop the threat mythologies; you act like a parasite that runs its economy only with the tips we leave behind, constantly searching for a major power to hide behind. Never forget the reality that we will be left face-to-face once your masters step off the stage.

[Uğur Tatlı @ugurtatli1923]

Bunu sen mi söylüyorsun? Bu mutlak butlan işlerine girerken hedefin bu olduğunu anlamadın mı? Hâlâ körü körüne savunuyorsun. Parti üyeleri bu duruma karşı, milletvekillerinin çoğu bu işe karşı, belediye başkanları öyle... Bununla da kalmıyor; diğer siyasi partiler de bu işe tepki veriyor, seçmen olarak bizler de tepki veriyoruz ama anlamıyorsunuz. Bir doğru sizsiniz, yaptığınız ise tamamen yanlış; bunu artık anlayın!

[Uğur Tatlı @ugurtatli1923]

You have no such right; you cannot arm any of those islands. These islands have a non-military status. You have been arming these islands since 1960. You should not sign agreements that you cannot stand behind. These violations you are committing even call into question the sovereignty over these islands, which were conditionally transferred to you. Then, when you are told that you can come without warning one night, be thankful you are in NATO; otherwise, it wouldn't have remained just a promise by now. You will carry out all kinds of lobbying activities, you will build up military forces in Dedeağaç, and you will cry when we say we will strike Athens. Tell your leaders to act with some honor, to be faithful to the agreements they have signed. Then you won't have to defend their dishonor here.

[Uğur Tatlı @ugurtatli1923]

Why is Turkey, which you have been sponsoring since 2003, not in this commercial? We are a nation of 90 million people; both the Turkish Football Federation and you will certainly be held accountable for this. First of all, we will call upon the Turkish public to boycott the sale of your products. #NikeBoykot ​#NikeAlmıyoruz

[Uğur Tatlı @ugurtatli1923]

Were these words spoken out of nowhere? If you arm the islands in violation of all agreements and lobby to prevent the purchase of aircraft, there is nothing more natural than you hearing these words. Are your country's interests important, but my country's interests unimportant? You cannot get results by cherry-picking certain words; you are both the cause of everything that has happened and the one displaying a hostile attitude.

[Uğur Tatlı @ugurtatli1923]

@fredman_a @RCoskunTR I think Lebanon wants you not to kill its people, not to drop bombs on its cities.