A vote for Labour, LibDems, the Green Party or independent Muslim candidates is a vote for the Muslim rape gangs and all who cover up this tragedy. No excuse.
So true. I remarked a couple of years ago that there is now little to no difference between the police in China and Hong Kong and the British police. All are now an arm of the State, highly politicised and ideological.
Both countries (UK and China) have similar restrictions on free speech, free assembly, Christianity, freedom of the press, and both practice forms of political imprisonment, have a corrupted judiciary, and an elite far removed from the average person.
The UK is now truly a socialist state which permits some capitalist businesses.
@LukeTryl Seems accurate. Many, many Labour types at private schools. Virtue signalling, luxury beliefs and living far from the problem areas.
The irony is that the parents are mostly working in finance, corporate law (not human rights cases), or are entrepreneurs.
@FT The UK spends about £50 billion a year subsidising immigration - benefits, housing, hotels, police, admin, NHS, etc.
Imagine the economic benefits of remigrating immigrants who are costing us? Lower crime, lower taxes, lower house prices, better NHS access, safe cities, and more!
@TheBritLad It's a start but not enough.
+ Deport anyone who arrived illegally and all foreign criminals
+ Stop all benefits and council housing to all immigrants, migrants
+ Give £10k for every foreigner from MENAPT countries to leave
+ Stop all Muslim immigration
+ Stop building mosques
@PaulEmbery Direct correlation between the number of flags displayed on their profile and their propensity to be a radical left-wing supporter of the imperial UN/WEF/EU order.
@NickBuckleyMBE The UK spends £50 billion a year on subsidising immigrants. We will be wealthier, safer, & much happier without mass immigration.
- Lower taxes
- Lower crime and safer streets
- Lower house prices
- Better NHS access
We need remigration & to stop their benefits & free housing.
@DrChrisParry Let's call the globalists by a more accurate name - Imperialists. They are trying to create a new world order run by the UN, WEF, EU and other institutions. It is an Imperial Order.
@FUDdaily I suspect (along with many others) that Sunak was told/nudged by other world leaders and the WEF to call an early election so that Labour could win.
The simultaneous introduction of WEF supported policies across Europe, Canada, Australia is simply too coincidental.
“The English working class has been so brainwashed…. it completely lacks the critical skills to identify propaganda and imagine a better future”….
I’m working class. I was also a staunch labour supporter for 30years, and when I was younger the party did actually seem to represent me and the working class - or maybe I was simply brainwashed into believing that? But this clearly has not been the case for years now.
It’s when comments and attitudes like yours became so prevalent in 2016 I finally accepted that Labour was no longer and would never again be the party of the working class. It was at this time when the real hatred, slurs and denigration of those less educated - but no less vital to society or deserving of an opinion - began.
The people who clean your offices and hospitals, clear the rubbish from the streets, catch your fish, deliver your furniture, care for your elderly, serve you meals and drinks, build your houses, fight in your army, check out your food in supermarkets, or prepare meals for your kids at school - these were the people the party turned on with contempt and vitriol when they DARED to ignore their ‘betters’ and vote to Leave. These are the people that the party called stupid, uneducated and bigoted for exercising their right to vote for what THEY wanted, rather than what YOU were telling them to want.
Labour is the same party that continues to tell these people that THEY are privileged, and that they should not complain about their experiences - instead, they should simply be kinder and more understanding towards those who put them down. The party that tells people that any pride they may hold in their country, its traditions or culture is bigoted and selfish because it doesn’t include and represent absolutely everyone. The party that demonises concerned parents, the party that views sexual or physical harm to women and girls as collateral damage when it comes to diversity, and the party that seems intent on viewing words which hurt feelings as more dangerous than the rape and SA of women and children.
The Labour Party hasn’t been the party of the working class for years now. It does NOT act in the best interests of the working class people whatsoever. In fact, the party has been become increasingly filled with members just like you who view the working class as beneath them, particularly when they refuse to ‘do as they’re told’ and follow instructions by people who consider themselves to be their “betters”.
For the working class Brits, the Labour Party is nothing more than a wolf in sheep’s clothing. The liberal elites have been infiltrating the party for years. It is the liberal, university educated and more often than not monied who have stolen the party from the working class. They promote anti-western values. They worship at the altar of DEI and yes - they are ABSOLUTELY pushing a Marxist agenda. And interestingly, it seems Labour Party members are more likely to view the English or British flag as racist than the many British ethnic minorities who embrace it.
It is the party that encapsulates the soft bigotry of low expectations. It’s the party that consistently seeks to divide the population by highlighting its differences, rather than treating everyone equally.
And above all, it’s the party of pure hypocrisy and self-entitlement, of “do as I say, not as I do”.
So allow me to rephrase your comment…
“The English working class are no longer brainwashed by the faux Labour Party …. And this demonstrates that they have the critical skills to identify propaganda and imagine a better future”….
2/
4 - save our legal system. We are heading for authoritarian and/or sharia law otherwise
5 - reduce housing prices
6 - increase employment opportunities. 1 million young adults are not in employment or education today!
7 - avoid civil unrest or worse.
The UK (and all of the West?) needs a mass remigration policy to
1 - save our culture and our history
2 - massively reduce crime and make our country safe for women and girls again
3 - massively reduce taxes. The UK spends more than 50 billion a year on immigrants
...2/
A mass deportation policy will now become the baseline manifesto promise for all major political parties at the next election.
The argument will be how far it goes.
Six months ago, it was a lonely argument to make in Parliament - my passionate support for the policy played a large part in my ejection from Reform.
It was seen as a freakish position to take. By Reform, the Tories, Labour. Pretty much everyone. I was smeared and insulted. We all were.
Yet here we are.
Politicians are falling over themselves to prove their deportation credentials - even Starmer. It's quite incredible to watch.
Social media has more power than anybody in Parliament realises. Anybody.
The argument is now not whether it should happen - it's about how many must go, how quickly it happens and how it can be done.
That, my friends, is progress. We must keep pushing.
Millions must go.
@GoodwinMJ Just like Canada on lenient sentencing. Funny how the leaders of both countries are star members of the WEF, as is Mark Rutte, former Netherlands Prime Minister. Coincidence?
4/
despite clear evidence that mass immigration isn't working. Govts are also hiding stats on the costs.
So, I don't think they have independently stumbled on this policy. I believe they are following very direct and influential advice from others (WEF? UN?).
3/
On mass immigration we don't hear much from the governments. It's as if they all agreed or were advised not to say anything. (?)
4. Each country has tried to hide the crime statistics of this immigration wave.
5. Each country has refused to change this policy despite...
...4
I would like to think that the 'no intended malice' theory of mass immigration and the massive increase in mass immigration is correct.
However, the problems I have with this theory are many.
1. The massive increase in immigration occurred at the same time in many countries
..2
Why *did* so many western nations seem to decide on a policy of infinity migration so suddenly, with seemingly no fanfare or public debate or even mention about it prior to backlash?
2/
2. The profile of the immigration is the same across these countries, primarily Islamic and African.
3. Each country has stayed more or less 'silent' about this policy change. Usually when attacked, politicians will defend their policies.
...3
@DPJHodges Always an overreaction, the pendulum swings. Laws of Physics.
This is just the beginning. The longer the elite/Labour/globalists push their agenda on the people in the UK and elsewhere, the stronger the reaction will be.
Wait till they try to bring in digital ID or currency!
Next stage of decadence: mass prostitution.
Societies that no longer believe in truth, loyalty, or permanence sell themselves piece by piece. First in entertainment, then in politics, and finally in flesh. The contract of civilization is broken, replaced by transactions without dignity.
When family collapses and morality disappears, the body becomes the only currency left. What was once sacred turns into merchandise, and what was once shameful becomes advertised as empowerment.
Mass prostitution is not a symptom of freedom—it is the proof of collapse. A people that cannot guard its own women, its own homes, its own values, has already sold itself.