Absolutely! I do not know how, in this day and age, we can't get better footage. Let alone why this footage has the fed sloppers convinced it is proof of Tyler Robinson! Such bullshit!
“Court documents only” until the story gets convenient, huh? You can’t call it strict evidence and then do interpretive dance with the parts you like while clown car-parking the rest. If the facts are so clear, they shouldn’t need a three-ring circus to hold them up. @Villgecrazylady
You’re asking people to accept a chain of assumptions while dismissing every inconsistency as irrelevant or explained elsewhere. If the evidence is as airtight as you claim, then transparency should strengthen the case—not require people to take prosecutors’ and commentators’ word for it.
Saying “there’s other footage,” “there’s a car match,” or “his parents identified him” isn’t a substitute for the public being able to independently assess the actual evidence. And “he doesn’t look like anyone at that distance” is a pretty wild way to wave off the fact that the footage is being used to identify someone.
Nobody is claiming a final verdict should come from one clip. People are asking legitimate questions about what’s been released, what hasn’t, and whether the public narrative matches the evidence. That isn’t “indulging” anything—it’s called skepticism.
And honestly, the way you respond makes everything worse. Instead of acknowledging why people have questions, you talk down to them and act like asking for the full picture is somehow irresponsible. That kind of smug, “just trust the official version” attitude is exactly what makes people more suspicious—not less.
Honestly, the video doesn't prove anything. A grainy clip of someone doing an "army crawl" tells us nothing about who that person actually is. You can't see a face, you can't confirm an identity, nothing. It doesn't put Tyler Robinson on that campus, it doesn't connect him to anything. All it shows is a person moving on the ground.
And the "where was he trained" stuff cuts both ways. Sure, maybe it's an easy movement to learn, but that's exactly the point, anybody could do it. That's not evidence, that's just people reading whatever they already believe into a blurry video. Strengthening a case requires actual proof tying a specific person to specific actions, and this clip doesn't do that.
Guess who owns Axon?
Trump bought $1–5 million of their stock in February 2026.
BlackRock and Vanguard are in it too.
That’s why you’re hearing nonstop about Flock… but almost nothing about the much bigger threat to the 4th Amendment.
Follow the money.