यह चाहता तो बिना टोपी के बिना दाढ़ी के छठ पूजा सामग्री बेच सकता था
लेकिन फिर भी आत्मविश्वास के साथ टोपी और दाढ़ी के साथ बेच रहा है
क्योकि इसे मालूम है हिंदू धर्मनिरपेक्षता के नशे में होते हैं
अब आप कल्पना करिए की कोई हिंदू टीका लगाकर भगवा कपड़े पहनकर अपने दुकान में भगवान जी की तस्वीर रखकर मिस्बाह वाली माला बेचे तो क्या कोई शांतिदूत उससे खरीदेगा??
बिल्कुल नहीं खरीदेगा क्योंकि उनका लक्ष्य फिक्स है वह एकदम फोकस्ड होते हैं वह कंफ्यूज नहीं होते
बाकि आप समझदार हैं।
The false dichotomy between Islam and Islamism is what gave America an elected senator like Abdul Al-Sayyid and a congressman like Hamawy.
When you separate Islam from Islamism, you tell the American public that Islam is good but Islamism is bad. And to prevent someone like Abdul Al-Sayyid from being elected, you first need to prove that he is an Islamist.
How do you prove that? Well, you need to connect him to the Muslim Brotherhood.
But so what? He can simply make fun of the accusation and say, “Yes, I have a brother who is Muslim, and he and I have a brotherhood.”
The American public would laugh and dismiss the accusation as Islamophobia.
However, if the American political class had told the truth from the beginning, that Islam itself is a dangerous political ideology, then any Muslim running for public office would be treated with suspicion until proven otherwise.
In that case, when the American public saw someone like Abdul, who is Muslim, and learned about his alleged connections to the Muslim Brotherhood, they would need little convincing that such a man should never get anywhere near the Capitol.
Sadly, the American political class did exactly the opposite. It has whitewashed Islam since 9/11, granted it more privileges than any other religion, and embraced the hoax of Islamophobia.
And now, 25 years later, you have to prove that a Muslim candidate is an Islamist, a distinction so abstract that proving it is nearly impossible.
Otherwise, he is dismissed as just another Muslim, which supposedly means nothing, and eventually gets elected.
Gross distortion by @IndiaToday — Calcutta High Court said no such thing.
So who wrote the X post? On whose instruction?
Credit to Mamata Banerjee for thinking strategically when she made Sagarika Ghose an MP. One RS seat = A Lutyens media house with multiple platforms.
“UPSC educator” and you wonder why the IAS’ economic ideas are indistinguishable from Mao’s. Check who his students are and you’ll find a psycho little Pol Pot in everyone. The pity is the parasitic trash he produces would’ve been absorbed and fattened on our taxes.
Draupadi says "Maa ki ....," and Pandavas turn into vahashi at her sight. That’s how Urduwood jamaat interprets Mahabharata
Had they ever dared to pull off similar nautanki with the revered figures from the book of sky?
Dream Girl (2019) by @EktaaRKapoor
@GemsOfBollywood@EktaaRKapoor हैरानी की बात तो ये है urduwood भांड ऐसी बेहुदगी इसलिए कर पाते है ..क्योंकी हिन्दु संगठन वाले जैसे VHP ओर अन्य इसका कोई प्रतिकार या आपत्ती नही करता..
कोई हिन्दु संगठन इनपे नज़र नही रखता .
दुसरी तरफ मुस्लिम ठेकेदार तुरंत कोर्ट का नोटीस भेज देते है .
Shashi Tharoor in IE today says India should accept dual nationality, citing numerous cases of Bollywood actors carrying foreign passports, and his own son.
Article is triggered by actor Imran Khan’s case.
In his view the heart of these individuals and the diaspora bats for India, and in many cases they carry foreign passports for convenience of travel etc.
Flimsy reasoning.
Article of the Indian Constitution explicitly forbids holding Indian and foreign citizenship at the same time. A Constitutional revision will be required.
Section 9 of The Citizenship Act, 1955enforces this constitutional rule.
Post partition there was need to establish clear, undivided national boundaries and prevent ambiguity over who belonged to India versus newly formed Pakistan.
Also preventing divided allegiance and to ensure that citizens—and especially future political leaders—did not hold competing allegiances to former colonial powers or neighboring states.
That concern remains.
National Security and Governance Concerns are real.
There are intelligence and espionage risks. Dual nationality complicates background checks and counter-intelligence. Allowing individuals with foreign state loyalties to hold sensitive government jobs, military positions, or public office presents major security risks.
Dual citizenship can create legal loopholes for individuals accused of financial fraud or criminal offences to evade Indian law enforcement.
Managing tax obligations, property ownership laws, and foreign exchange rules for millions of dual citizens would create severe administrative friction. Dual status could be exploited to bypass domestic financial restrictions or create tax loopholes.
India has one of the largest overseas diasporas in the world. Granting full voting rights and domestic political influence to tens of millions of non-resident dual citizens could drastically skew local elections .
Managing dual nationals requires intricate legal coordination regarding taxation, military conscription, and diplomatic protection. Current administrative systems are not designed to track dual legal obligations for millions of diaspora members.
It’s @BhaiPreetSingh versus the Madina Masjid-Rafiq-e-Millat
Trust as well as state in this illegal mosque case from Shalimar Bagh, Delhi
As the petitioner, he fought a court case and secured court orders for all three-storeys of the structure razed down. Mullahs communalised the demolition and unleashed a propaganda campaign
And now, see this green flag? Right under the nose of authorities, encroachers have again started gathering here for namaz
But this too till be fought in court until compete reclamation of land
We stand firmly behind @BhaiPreetSingh. This is extraordinarily courageous work, that has put his own life at risk
Follow and support this fight for reclaiming our public land at https://t.co/dYr1arLKy1
It's not normal demolition, it's a demolition of a Dynast's ego & illegal empire of Bhaipo who was above any law when Mamata was CM of Bengal.
Illegal encroachment by Abhishek Banerjee on entire footpath outside his Kalighat residence being demolished.
हमारा क्या होगा ?
सारे मुल्ला है सबके हाथ में हैंडमेड तलवार फरसे है।
रैली इन्ही हथियारों के प्रदर्शन के लिए है।
कल अगर ये भीड़ निहत्थे हिन्दुओं के घरों घुसेगी
तो हमारी सुरक्षा के लिए सरकार के पास क्या रोड मैप है?
FRENCH AUTHOR CHARGED FOR CRITICISM OF ISLAM
Michel Houellebecq is a French novelist, filmmaker and singer.
He is known for his 'controversial' views on Islam and demographic replacement.
He has said that Islam is "the dumbest of religions" and has warned "when entire territories come under Islamist control … [violent] acts of resistance will take place"
He has also said:
"the wish of the population with French roots" was "for the violence to decrease, for [Muslim immigrants] to respect the law and people. Or, another good solution, for them to leave."
The Union of Mosques of France filed a legal complaint alleging Houellebecq of "encouraging violence" through his remarks.
In 2015, he published a novel titled 'Submission', imagining France under a Muslim president whose election leads to sweeping political and social changes.
He did this just a day after the the Charlie Hebdo massacre in Paris. One of the victims of that murderous terrorist attack on freedom of speech just so happened to be a friend of his.
A judge has now charged him with "complicity in incitement to discrimination, hatred or violence"
Houellebecq’s attorneys told Le Monde that the "[incriminating] remarks have no dimension of incitement, not even implicitly" and said their client
"[regrets] the increasing judicialization of intellectual debate."
When far left groups and Muslim organisations take people to court to get a politically motivated judge to charge them for speaking freely, that signs the death knell for feedom of speech.
Resist them while you can with every ounce of determination and with every resource you have, or risk losing those freedoms forever.
VFX was outsourced to own company.
Distribution again to own partner Karan Johar.
Karan Johar made similar blockbuster claims after Brahmastra. Then after an year, declared major financial loss, sold his company and now became film distributor.
He had stated how they manipulate reviews and box office numbers.
Technically, such Cinema Accounting without disclosures is similar to money laundering.
Ranbeef's father was fan of Dawood Ibrahim when Underworld controlled 80% or more of Bollywood finances.
World changed. methods changed. They even changed character of Ram and Ravan.
But charitra of beef eaters never changes.
the #RamayanaMovie seems to have a huge PR budget, seeing all those podcasts and tweets coming out.
2000 crore probably didn't go into making of the movie...
No need for MEA to give any explanation. The Embassy was no doubt instructed to cancel her visa. It can’t act on its own.
The US cancels visa without informing the concerned person and gives no explanation.