Hena & Amy bringing up all the ships within BTS to confirm that they are all closer than Taekook..But being jkks,they forget that Jm from 2019 until a few months ago, was f√cking Daeun.
Published by Daeun,confirmed by the company.But losers & cowards pretend it doesn't exist🤦🏻🤦🏻
My PSA for today!!!!!!!
🚨🚨 If you ever receive this DM from anyone, including your moots, know that it's a SCAM!!! DO NOT INTERACT!!! Just delete, block & report!!!! 🚨🚨
HYBE's post-BTS strategy
BTS helped build the audience. HYBE now appears focused on owning the infrastructure that audience lives in.
If we strip away the PR language, the article reveals something rather different from a music festival.
HYBE reports that this year's Weverse Con attracted 34,000 online and offline spectators, the largest audience since the festival's launch, with around 30 participating artists. The number itself is noteworthy, although it should be treated cautiously, as the article combines offline and online attendance into a single figure without indicating how many spectators were physically present and how many watched remotely.
The most revealing detail, however, isn't the attendance figure but a single sentence: artists from labels outside the company can perform at Weverse Con as long as they are registered on Weverse. The distinction reveals what is actually being built. Artists don't need to belong to HYBE. They need to belong to Weverse.
This is a fundamentally different business model. Traditional labels build value around artists. Platforms build value around ecosystems. The objective is no longer simply to attract fans to a particular group, but to bring artists, fandoms, livestreams, merchandise and communities into the same infrastructure. The festival is useful. The artists are useful. The fandoms are useful. The real asset is the system connecting them.
There's another shift hidden inside this model: fandom becomes user. Netflix doesn't want a fan of a single series. Amazon doesn't want a fan of a single seller. Apple doesn't want a fan of a single iPhone. Platforms want users who remain inside the ecosystem, consume different products and move between services without leaving. The same question can be asked about Weverse. Does HYBE ultimately want a BTS fan, or a Weverse user who arrived through BTS, stayed because of BTS, and eventually began consuming dozens of other products inside the same system?
In that context, perhaps the most revealing detail isn't who appears in the article, but who does not.
BTS is not mentioned at all.
That absence is probably not accidental. For years, HYBE has been attempting to build a business that doesn't depend on BTS as its sole growth engine. Yet there may be another reason as well. The stronger BTS becomes as a brand, the more important it becomes for HYBE to demonstrate that the wider ecosystem can function without them. From an investor's perspective, excessive dependence on a single asset is a risk. A platform is valued not because one artist succeeds, but because the system continues to generate value even when individual artists are absent. In that sense, the article isn't merely describing a festival. It's quietly communicating resilience.
Interestingly, HYBE itself no longer primarily describes its business through music alone. On its corporate website, the company defines itself as a "Global Entertainment Lifestyle Platform Company Based on Music and Technology."
Translated from PR language into business language, the article says something like this: Weverse is becoming large enough to function as a platform in its own right rather than merely a fan app associated with BTS.
If that interpretation is correct, Weverse Con is not simply a music festival.
It's a demonstration that the platform is becoming larger than any individual artist.