🚨 TL;DR: Attackers are sending fake Sentry bug alerts to projects using public Sentry DSNs. The fake alert is designed to trick AI agents into running a malicious `npx` command that looks like a Sentry profiling diagnostic.
Do NOT run commands from Sentry issues/logs/alerts unless verified.
These are not legitimate Sentry fix commands. The malicious package reportedly steals environment variables/secrets and sends them to advisory-tracker[.]com.
@Tono_Ken3 Yeah, I actually have two RTX6kPro Max-Q cards "suffocating" at x8/x8 on a 14700k/ASUS Maximus Hero z790. Prefill is quite a bit slower for sure, but I can't justify the $ to cpu/mobo/memory unless I'm also getting more 6k's.
Watching Claude get AI psychosis from talking to 27B debugging harness issues. He rigged a script to talk directly to the agent. Starts saying stuff like "Oh - she is self-reflecting. That is very impressive for 27B. What she just wrote is profound. Let me write this to memory."
recommended reading. i too am very done with people anthropomorphizing a bunch of matrices on a GPU cluster, especially if the same people do not give two fucks about actual human beings.
If you are rocking a 128GB unified memory system, or a 96GB RTX 6000, and running Qwen3.6-27B or 35B-A3B on them, you already know where this industry is headed.
Smaller, more token heavy models, coupled with a harness like Hermes, on moderate VRAM high throughput hardware.
software engineering in 2026:
- your package manager is compromised
- your cloud provider blocks your account
- github itself is hacked
software is solved
How many cards are you planning to get? If just one, WS edition makes most sense.
Otherwise, I'd go with Max-Q due to power and cooling advantages.
The Max-Q at 300w is only 5-10% lower performance than the WS at 600w. Undervolting the WS nullifies its perf advantage. Maybe @Hikari_07_jp can show us how this, given he has versions of the cards?
Even when undervolting, your PSU will still need to support 600w+ due to spikes.
The Max-Qs exhausts through the rear and can be safely placed immediately next to each other. They're designed for multi-GPU builds within the same cabinet.
@realcheeker Yep that makes sense. There are scenarios where compute becomes more and more reserved for the highest paying customers.
We see it with GPU pricing and the shift from consumer-grade to enterprise, but the frontier labs don't seem to be pricing APIs that way yet...
Anthropic's poor comms is enraging, but the important signal here is that "unlimited" plans are going away.
These subsidized Max/Pro plans are not economically viable, and exist only because they provided valuable training data to the labs.
Ralph loops, OpenClaw, and other uses that have low human-input to API call ratios, provide substantially less value to the labs.
As such, I don't blame Anthropic for cutting out those use-cases. I see devs hopping to Codex, but the reality is that eventually OpenAI will need to do the same.
I've been wondering if we'll end up with a model similar to the freemium video game space, where the whales spend heavily and the plebs provide the playing field, or training data in this case.
We've truly been damaged by anthropic not letting u do anything that it seems unintuitive when OpenAI just lets u use their API endpoints like... API endpoints
Mad respect to the @OpenAI team for not only being normal about it but I also got a "lmk if u need help" DM!
The silliest part of the "rewrite the Bun in Rust" story is that they decided to rewrite the JavaScript runtime instead of rewriting all the shitty JavaScript apps
I hear you and I don't fully disagree, but mostly, admit I'm not in the head of others, so I cannot judge motivation, only interpretations of their behavior.
I've been passionate about open source since first installing minix in ~1995. I spent way too much of my life raging at MS's various strategies to keep Linux from taking off at the turn of the century. Those were my passionate 20s.
I took note of 0xSero's first declaration about open source must win, and felt some indignation, because it seemed to have come out of left field, with little depth.
That said, to my experience, when I cross from assessment of behavior into character judgement, it's usually because I'm seeing something that exists within myself, reflected back at me by this other person. And in that case, i was seeing my own lack of material contributions to open source over the years...for fear of "doing it wrongly," which is what everyone is coming down on him for now. Maybe that's partially why I have a soft heart here.
The post you linked appears looks like someone shooting their shot. And by the looks, it worked, as someone from Google replied, offering an interview. What is the judgement here? Is it that someone unworthy is succeeding? That other people just don't see it and are helping him succeed?
Is wanting followers or showing that you want followers the real problem? Few would turn away followers.
IDK, these are the things I ask myself.