But the richest man keeps pushing the narrative that October 11 had nothing to do with them, just as they always do.
No matter what facts or publicly available evidence are presented—including the company’s guilty plea in the U.S.—they simply deny or dismiss them. Accountability is never the response.
Instead of facing the problems, acknowledging what happened, and strengthening their risk controls, they accuse anyone who raises legitimate questions of being “jealous.” 🤣
🧠 Warren Buffett:
“Hayatta istediğim her şeye sahibim.”
“Bir yerine on evim olabilirdi. Daha mutlu olur muydum? Asla.
İki yerine on arabam olabilirdi. Daha mutlu olmazdım. Bu beni çıldırtırdı.”
↓
“400 metrelik bir yatım olabilirdi.
Ama o zaman onlarca kişilik mürettebatı yönetmek zorunda kalırdım.
Bazıları benden çalardı.
Bazıları birbiriyle kavga ederdi.
Kim bilir daha neler olurdu?
Gemi kaptanı olmak isteseydim başka bir mesleğe girerdim.”
↓
İnsanlar zenginliğin daha fazla şeye sahip olmak olduğunu düşünüyor.
Oysa gerçek zenginlik;
İstemediğin şeyleri satın almak zorunda olmamak,
İstemediğin insanlarla çalışmak zorunda olmamak,
Ve zamanını istediğin gibi kullanabilmektir.
Finansal özgürlüğün özü budur.
(Charlie Rose, 2009)
Nvidia CEO'su Jensen Huang'a, 'hayatında tanıdığınız en zeki kişi kim' sorusuna cevabı:
- Tanıdığım en zeki insan üniversite giriş sınavından berbat bir puan bile almış olabilir.
- Herkes yazılım programlamanın nihai akıllı meslek olduğunu düşünüyordu.
- Yapay zekanın çözdüğü ilk şey ne oldu? Yazılım programlama.
- Zeki tanımı çoğu insanın düşündüğünden çok farklı.
- Gerçek zeka: Teknik yetenek + İnsan empatisi + Söylenmeyeni anlama becerisi
- Köşelerin ötesini görebilen insanlar gerçekten, gerçekten akıllıdır.
- Sorunları ortaya çıkmadan önce önleyebilmek - sadece havayı hissettiğin için.
- O hava: Veri + Analiz + İlk prensipler + Yaşam deneyimi + Bilgelik + Diğer insanları hissetmek
- İşte bu zekadır.
- Geleceğin zeki tanımı bu olacak.
Ve o kişi SAT'den berbat bir puan alabilir.
Anthropic is calling for top AI labs to weigh slowing the pace of development, suggesting that AI systems are advancing so rapidly that they may soon be able to improve themselves without human intervention in ways that could pose societal risks. https://t.co/8c7xkeX17B
@emilyyvuong ở đây có bao nhiêu người thực sự đang sử dụng AI mỗi ngày và cảm nhận rõ được sự hữu dụng cũng như độ thông minh của nó tăng theo mỗi quý ? . Bong bóng cái đéo gì v mấy thằng ngu và non tech ???
Elon Musk: "We live in the most interesting times and I think this is like 80% likely to be good and 20% bad.
And I think if we're cognizant and careful about the bad part, on balance actually, it will be the future that we want, or the future that is preferable.
I think everyone will have access to goods and services and education. And so, I think probably it leads to more human happiness."
I don’t like debate—because you can never wake someone who is pretending to sleep.
That said, clarifying the facts matters. For the record:
1.BTC began declining roughly 30 minutes before the USDe depeg.
This exactly supports the earlier point: the initial move was a market shock.
Absent the USDe leverage loop, the market would likely have stabilized at that point. The cascading liquidations were not inevitable—they were amplified by structural leverage, as explained previously.
2.Dragonfly has never been an investor in OKX—neither a minor nor a major one.
In fact, OKX invested in Dragonfly before @hosseeb joined the firm.
Separately, one partner’s previous fund (not Dragonfly) invested in OKX. These are distinct and easily verifiable facts.
3.I will not spend further time on this topic.
The facts are clear. I do not intend to engage in extended debate.
Binance released a detailed investigation report dated Oct. 10, 2025, acknowledging two technical incidents: between 21:18 and 21:51 UTC, its asset transfer subsystem experienced a roughly 33-minute performance degradation during a concentrated sell-off; between 21:36 and 22:15 UTC, the indices for USDe, WBETH, and BNSOL deviated abnormally amid thin liquidity and slower cross-venue rebalancing. https://t.co/RnVuAiD8c1
Star Xu Calls Out CZ and Binance
If you missed it, back on October 10, 2025, a glitch in Binance's software sparked a huge crypto market crash. This mess caused forced sales of positions worth $19 to $28 billion, hitting Bitcoin the hardest since it's the most traded asset. The fallout spread like wildfire across the whole industry.
Rather than owning up to problems with real facts or taking responsibility, Binance relies on paid influencers to bury any real complaints. Star Xu points out that this shady tactic doesn't help grow crypto—it just destroys trust, and in the end, we all suffer for it.
What the crypto world really needs is transparent exchanges run by straightforward leaders.
Hyperliquid.
People have underestimated the impact of 10/10. The incident caused real and lasting damage to the industry.
An industry-leading company should focus on strengthening core infrastructure, building trust with global users and regulators, and protecting the long-term interests of the majority of crypto users, setting an example for others to follow. Instead, some chose to pursue short-term gains—repeatedly launching Ponzi-like schemes, amplifying a handful of “get-rich-quick” narratives, and directly or indirectly manipulating the prices of low-quality tokens, drawing millions of users into assets closely tied to them.
This has become their shortcut for attracting traffic and user attention. Legitimate criticism is then drowned out—not through facts or accountability, but via aggressive narrative control and coordinated influencer campaigns.
This approach does not build an industry.
It erodes trust—and ultimately, everyone pays the price.