We cannot interpret these results as evidence of causality. The study is not randomized, lacks a placebo control, and has no blinding. The authors also acknowledge limitations in the reliability of lifestyle data and the absence of structured follow-up interviews. Moreover, the observation that better outcomes were seen in individuals who exercised, were obese, or even used tobacco/alcohol suggests the influence of confounding variables and selection bias rather than a strong biological effect. The basic design of the study is as follows: records from multiple centers in China between 2016 and 2020 were reviewed. Initially, 2,875 records were screened, and 1,062 participants were ultimately included in the analysis. All participants had 12 months of nattokinase (NK) use, with pre- and post-treatment lipid panels and carotid ultrasound data available. The product used was a Sungen Bioscience tablet; the standard dose was 10,800 FU/day, with a smaller subgroup receiving 3,600 FU/day. Some participants also received vitamin K2 (180 mcg/day), while others were co-administered aspirin (100 mg/day).
The aspirin/K2 aspect is also overstated in the tweet. While the paper does include a co-administration analysis, this does not represent a separate randomized treatment arm. Only 96 participants used aspirin and 181 used K2, and their outcomes were compared with the rest of the cohort. According to the study itself, K2 mainly affected lipid parameters, with no significant differences observed in other atherosclerotic markers. Although better results were reported with aspirin co-administration, this is based on observational subgroup analysis and does not justify the conclusion that this combination represents an optimal stack.
@pegobry_en You’d better look for patterns in history, then come back and tell me this is a random occurrence with no root cause. Huh? This rot is absolutely unbelievable.
@ProfDemirtas Özgür bey bu anketin kaynağı nedir? Atlas ın Temmuz ayı raporunda destek yüzde %44. …%70 çok abartlılı bir rakam olmuş. Bunu neden araştırmadan yayınlıyorsunuz??
https://t.co/rExPMCxewc
@convl0 @BryceMLipscomb@JMilei No, the claims appear overstated. Recent polls (e.g., Atlas, July 2025) show Milei's approval at ~44%, not 63%. No credible sources confirm 70% support for libertarianism; election wins indicate backing for his policies, but not that level. Sources: Bloomberg, Boz Report.
Öyle olsa bile, ciddi bir güç asimetrisi altında ezilen insanların güçsüzlüklerini ve muhtaçlıklarını (psikolojik harp kapsamında bile olsa) bu şekilde ifşa etmelerinin neden insanca değerlendirilemediğini, bu insanların neden aynı günah kuyusuna atıldığını sorgulamak gerekir. Övdüğünüz İsrail değerlerinin insanlık için ne ifade ettiğini ve insanlığın iyi bir geleceği açısından bu değerlerin nereye oturduğunu da anlamamak zor olsa gerek. Seküler taraftan bakınca İsrail in dini saiklerine laf etmediğinizi anlamak ise zor. Sefil Hamas ın yediği bokun aynısını güçlü taraf yiyince mazur görmeye ne denir?