no(ah/elle/e) 🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈

✨hopeless gender wanderer ✨
28, non-binary/agender, any pronouns
"a new breed on this earth" -some guy on omegle
banner/profilepic credit:

[no(ah/elle/e) 🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈 @urlocalnonbinry]

@thatbluevampire @ElectricClair I say I unequipped my gender and now nothing else fits in the slot.

[no(ah/elle/e) 🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈 @urlocalnonbinry]

@clxudfast @sophiiess_ It may not "want" in the human sense. But the product was available to a vulnerable person who then used it and their mental state worsened upon using it, to the point of suicide. We don't have to blame the AI itself. We can blame the labs for making it available as such.

[no(ah/elle/e) 🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈 @urlocalnonbinry]

@geckotailzz @stararism I'm non-binary, not particularly dysphoric, and fully aware my experiences differ from other (trans) people. I know a lot of "advice" I could give would suck. So I don't speak on such things. It's not even about queerness, it's about not speaking on things you don't understand.

[no(ah/elle/e) 🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈 @urlocalnonbinry]

UGC stands for user-generated content. This ad boasts about AI being able to "generate user-generated content". Do words mean nothing now?

[Constants @constants2026]

🤑 Claude can now generate UGC Ad Video from any product link

[no(ah/elle/e) 🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈 @urlocalnonbinry]

@f4micom Honest question: why is the European Parliament, the non-human entity made up of (I'm assuming) ever-changing political humans making a political post like this? At least in America those claiming to represent a political chamber tend to include their political affiliation.

[no(ah/elle/e) 🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈 @urlocalnonbinry]

@geckotailzz yeah. if my charitable reading is accurate, it would mean that they (partially) conceptualize queer theory as esoteric buzzwords, not lived experiences. and i say this as an nb person whose gender experience can be and is fundamentally different than those of (other) trans ppl.

[no(ah/elle/e) 🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈 @urlocalnonbinry]

@geckotailzz to be somewhat fair to them, a charitable reading is that this is a misplaced adjective due to an overcorrection in how they write about gender. but even under that scenario its clear to me that their conception of gender is still extremely shallow.

[no(ah/elle/e) 🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈 @urlocalnonbinry]

@starzeeke incredible

[no(ah/elle/e) 🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈 @urlocalnonbinry]

@NathanL0lz @LuciferSta56031 @bubblyaraz I agree they are different things. And the fact that the author of the original comic doesn't seem to realize that is concerning.

[no(ah/elle/e) 🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈 @urlocalnonbinry]

@LuciferSta56031 @bubblyaraz And I think the reason people are conflating the two is that they babies born to immigrants as invasive as if those babies were literally living in those people's private houses. The mere existence of immigrants is as fearful to them as home burglars. /end

[no(ah/elle/e) 🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈 @urlocalnonbinry]

@LuciferSta56031 @bubblyaraz I fear it's conflating land ownership and the legal right to be somewhere. If you own a house, you also (generally) get the legal right to live there. A more direct "punchline" would be: "that means the baby can live at the hospital!" /1

[no(ah/elle/e) 🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈 @urlocalnonbinry]

@Owlizabeth2 @Ocean_555555 cis people are confusing

[no(ah/elle/e) 🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈 @urlocalnonbinry]

@Ocean_555555 @Owlizabeth2 That makes approximately 5% more sense, but I'd still wonder what in the world they think the "your secret's safe with me" line meant in all this. Still a weird opener if they think it's about sex.

[no(ah/elle/e) 🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈 @urlocalnonbinry]

@Owlizabeth2 @Ocean_555555 Sure, but why do the cis apparently think that works, lol?

[no(ah/elle/e) 🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈 @urlocalnonbinry]

@Owlizabeth2 @Ocean_555555 Also, whose opening line for sex is "your secret's safe with me" after someone just trauma-dumped to you?

[no(ah/elle/e) 🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈 @urlocalnonbinry]

I don't subscribe to the "Jax was doomed from the start" theory. I've seen a few people say that Jax, having joined the circus in a vulnerable state, never really had the chance or ability to get better. If this were true, it would render the message of the show pointless.

[no(ah/elle/e) 🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈 @urlocalnonbinry]

@uwunetes Yes, you should watch it. But you should also try to avoid all the Internet discourse and form your own opinions.

[no(ah/elle/e) 🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈 @urlocalnonbinry]

tadc and isttg are probably the two main pieces of trans media ive seen, and they both impacted me greatly

[no(ah/elle/e) 🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈 @urlocalnonbinry]

@Karkesis @ChazakielDoremi Funny thing: I actually killed Father in one hit with a Power Fist before he said a word because I thought he was an enemy. Nothing else happened and I got a bit confused before going back a save and actually talking to him.

[no(ah/elle/e) 🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈 @urlocalnonbinry]

@ChazakielDoremi The very first time I played Fallout 4, when I went under for the second time I immediately assumed my son would be old when I found him again. I was confused when the game kept trying to convince me I was still looking for a young Shaun.

[no(ah/elle/e) 🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈 @urlocalnonbinry]

@eldenringmovie That's understandable. I'd argue the show underexplains a lot. Some may not like that, and I get it. I personally choose to do my best to see in between the gaps. And while others would say those gaps are writing mistakes, I tend to believe they were intentional and meaningful.

[no(ah/elle/e) 🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈 @urlocalnonbinry]

It's called plot / character development. They didn't fulfill their promise. That was done on purpose. Yes, it's bad that they let it happen. That's how you're supposed to feel. They didn't write it that way on accident.

[rina 🎀 @rinawina_]

/// tadc spoilers
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

not to beat a dead horse but i genuinely can’t get over the fact that the convo in the beginning of ep 8 about not letting jax “running off and abstracting somewhere” was just a waste when that’s what immediately happened in ep 9