blank

[Abomination @Abomination81]

How the government pays ghetto women 15k a month to stay home.

I am/used to be a car dealer and we always had tons of ghetto women making insane money, its still happening now.. They game systems put in place to help people, stacking and maximizing the benefits.

Forums, facebook groups and other friends hold their hands, government officials help... and they end up committing fraud that isn't enforced and milking the government.

Crazy thing is, this 15k a month, IS AVERAGE of the numbers below AND POST TAX. Meaning for you to get the same NET you need to make $275,000 a year!!!!

I say ghetto because I've only seen it here and you must have a loose moral compass. You must also commit mild/intense fraud... say you live in California while living elsewhere, do the daycare fraud, have multiple baby daddies... and a dead dad helps too.

Here is the recipe they use

CASH - illegally claiming high cost of living area in cali even living elsewhere

TANF - 400/500 a month, supposed to be 1x but its not

SSI - 994 claiming disability, obesity caused issues qualify most

Child support - 800-2000 depending on how many baby daddies pay

Boyfriend or friend paying rent illegally - 1000

CalWORKS (California tanf) - 1400 a month

Child Care Assistance - 3500 a month to the provider, who then kicks back, or uses the other person as a provider in a quid pro quo situation

SSDI Survivor benefits if a dad is dead, super common - 1000-3000 a month

FREE SHIT
Section 8 housing. Such a scam. Covers a bedroom for each kid and yourself. In Vegas that is a 2800-3300 a month house... free.

Utilities assistance LIHEAP - All utilities paid (including internet lmao)

Obama Phone/ Lifeline - Free Phone

Medicaid - Free zero deductible insurance for everyone

SNAP - 1300 on a credit card to buy all food

WIC - 800 ish on a credit card to buy food, baby formula, etc (less if no formula)

YEARLY LOTTERY

Tax time, earned income credit -13000-18000 cash back. Even with no external income

PROGRAMS
Forums, facebook groups and other friends hold their hands, government officials help... and they end up committing fraud that isn't enforced and milking the government.

https://t.co/0UJLkmOjPR
https://t.co/Zs2YXG1prj
https://t.co/qOsCVjQNvy
https://t.co/KfzxxWcxCy
https://t.co/8rT7RqryLC
https://t.co/BJZPQZGDTQ
https://t.co/Nl9853dH6T
https://t.co/BsTTUytTi4
https://t.co/EMBKodFVa3

[Naomi Seibt @NaomiSeibt]

Ursula von der Leyen is a tyrannical witch.

The EU will enforce an ID authentication app for social media.

When you criticize your government,
When you post about REMIGRATION,
they will know where to find you,
and everyone you love.

They BAN social media for children, because they may grow up “FAR-RIGHT” once they find out the truth on 𝕏.

We @Deu_Kurier oppose the EU’s totalitarian authority.

[France Résistance @FranceRsistanc1]

🚨🇪🇺💥 LA COLÈRE GRONDE DANS TOUTE L'EUROPE

« Assez de Von der Leyen ! Von der Leyen, dehors ! »

France, Espagne, Italie, Belgique, Pologne, Grèce, Angleterre, Allemagne…des voix s'élèvent pour exiger le démantèlement de l'Union européenne.

IL EST TEMPS DE RÉSISTER.🔥🔥🔥

[Joey Mannarino @JoeyMannarino]

Brussels is now trying to ban the demonstration tomorrow that is in support of the Save Europe Act.

The demonstration was scheduled because the European Parliament has stated they won’t even consider the act once it arrives at 1,000,000 signatures.

This is what democracy apparently looks like.

They not only are banning the act but now even the demonstrate to protest banning the act.

The EU is the new USSR.

[dejanira @dejanirasilveir]

Von der Leyen está siendo expuesta. La públicación de los textos de Pfizer deben ser expuestos.
Está casada con el médico alemán Heiko von der Leyen, que es el Director de Orgenesis, PROPIEDAD de PFIZER...
LA CORRUPCIÓN EN SU MÁXIMA EXPRESIÓN.

🔥🔥🔥🔥☄️

[Defend the West @real_DefendWest]

This has to be one of the most hilarious and revealing moments from the unelected dictator Ursula von der Leyen.

She says, “If they were in Moscow, they would be arrested in 2 minutes!”

While arresting someone from the audience.

She literally has no shame.

[Vincent Vandeputte @VincentVandep8]

De manier waarop Chat Control er –als een dief in de nacht– is doorgeduwd, is werkelijk schandalig en een democratie totaal onwaardig.

Ter herinnering: het Europees Parlement had dit dossier eerder al twee keer eerder tegengehouden.

Deze week werd vervolgens een procedurele kunstgreep bovengehaald: een zogenaamde spoedprocedure waarbij een gewone meerderheid van de aanwezige parlementsleden niet volstond (?) om die tegen te houden, maar een absolute meerderheid van ALLE Europarlementsleden nodig was.
Maar velen waren al op verlof vertrokken natuurlijk…

En dus stemde een meerderheid van de aanwezige Europarlementsleden opnieuw tégen.

—> Maar omdat de uitzonderlijk hoge drempel niet werd gehaald, werd de spoedprocedure toch goedgekeurd en kon Chat Control alsnog versneld worden doorgeduwd.

Als een aanwezige meerderheid tegen stemt, maar die meerderheid door een procedurele truc niet volstaat om het voorstel tegen te houden, dan is het moeilijk nog ernstig te nemen wanneer Europa zichzelf een toonbeeld van democratie noemt.

[Vel 🇫🇷 @0xVelt]

Remplacer les Blancs par des millions d’envahisseurs incultes et violents, c’est pas de la migration, c’est un génocide lent et légal

[Mosab Hassan Yousef @MosabHasanYOSEF]

As someone who grew up in the Muslim world, I’ve seen this pattern repeat itself:

When Muslims are weak and in the minority, they speak endlessly about tolerance, coexistence, and peace.

When they become strong and gain power, that tolerance completely disappears, even toward their own people.

This isn’t an opinion. This is historical fact, proven across centuries and across many countries.

The West needs to understand this pattern before it’s too late.

Tolerance in Islam is not a principle. It’s a strategy.

[materkel.gwei 🦇🔊 @materkel]

Would be a shame if RobinhoodXLighter fully leaning into ETH would steal the show from Coinbase, who single handedly fumbled a ~2 year lead by being toxic Bitcoin maximalists 😘

[PeterSweden @PeterSweden7]

IT'S WORSE THAN YOU THINK.

So the EU just approved Chat Control 1.0

Despite a MAJORITY of the elected politicians voting AGAINST it.

314 voted no.
276 voted yes.

Because this vote was forced just before summer vacation, many politicians weren't there to vote.

And without an absolute majority of 361 no votes, the chat control passed by default.

And guess what?

The EU parliament already voted NO to this in March.

Yet another vote was forced now just before summer vacation and this time it passed because not enough MEPs was there to vote no this time.

This doesn't sound democratic.

[Mikko Ohtamaa @moo9000]

YouTube has just taken down the political discussion clip about the EU's Chat Control, and the video is no longer viewable in the EU.

This has been confirmed by several parties. The video is still available outside the EU.

@puheenaihefi podcast is a Finnish current affairs program with 60k subscribers. In this episode, Peter Sund, CEO of the Finnish Information Security Cluster (Kyberala ry) offered pointed criticism of the EU's new Chat Control directive, which was enacted under questionable circumstances.

Because the media is in Finnish, it is highly likely the censorship request came from a Finnish government official or a related party.

This makes it troublesome.

Because the Finnish constitution §12 guarantees freedom of expression.

Preventing political publications is a criminal offence: Abuse of Official Position, punishable by a fine or imprisonment for up to two years.

You can listen to this episode on Apple Music and Spotify.

Spotify link https://t.co/lw249mESyf

Dysfunctional YouTube link https://t.co/1kYDSECM5l

[Mario ZNA @MarioBojic]

🚨🇪🇺WATCH: EU Needs the War in Ukraine to Survive.

Without the war in Ukraine, EU leaders would have to answer for the mass migration that has destroyed Europe.

Without Russia as the "enemy," Europeans would realize that the real enemy is in Brussels.

[vitalik.eth @VitalikButerin]

One thing I find striking in the discourse between AI 2040 and its detractors is that the two seem to be locked in to totally incompatible worldviews of how fast and how much of a big deal AI progress is:

* In AI 2040, every scenario sees superintelligence of some kind emerging by 2040, unless a herculean effort is made to completely stop it
* Detractors say things like "AI 2040 is naive about human coordination ability and a threat to freedom", but don't seem to see any naivety in assuming that the ASI transition will just go well by default, don't seem to see ASI itself as a massive power concentrator risk, and don't seem to feel fear of humanity's "hard power" dropping to zero if ASIs can do literally every task better than we can. This stance makes total sense in a "AI is normal technology" world, zero sense in a world where superintelligence is possible by 2030 and almost guaranteed by 2040

I think my beliefs are:

- If I was confident that (present-day-style) AI is normal technology, I would be in the detractor camp
- If I was confident that superintelligence is coming in 2030 by default, I would be closer to the AI 2040 camp - it's naive, but every other option is naive squared?

But my problem is that I feel great uncertainty and have no idea which of the two worlds (or some other third thing) we're living in?

Hence why I continue to be open-minded about slowdowns/pauses, but also I feel very uncomfortable with the "open source bad, the good outcome is the one where our guys have controlling global dominance" push coming from some major AI companies and intellectuals - in a "normal" world that's the sort of thing that triggers every political alarm bell at the same time.

A big reason why I have been advocating and trying my best to support the d/acc platform (rapid up-skilling in formal verification, cryptography, secure and open hardware, pandemic resistance and other defensive biotech, food and basic resource security, public epistemics, non-power-concentrating versions of physical security) is that these things are clearly worth doing in both worlds.

The 2040 plan is already much more open source friendly (even mandating it! yay). It also includes "mutually assured compute destruction" ideas which (if they work) effectively give one of 2-5 actors the ability to trigger a global compute winter - as opposed to giving 1-5 actors the ability to selectively disenfranchise people they consider baddies while exempting themselves. This is also a big improvement. So I can see the earnest attempts to improve along the dimensions detractors criticize on ("does this concentrate power in big AI labs and superpower governments?"), and I appreciate this. I think many people don't appreciate enough the differences between different "kinds" of pause buttons, and how some concentrate power far more than others. Probably we can think harder and improve even more here.

But on the "slowdown/pause or not" topic, there isn't a magic "escape the tradeoff" button.

The Hansonian in me says: the winning deal is a deal which, from the perspective of both sides' present-day beliefs and knowledge, both sides would accept, though for different reasons. If the crux is AI progress speed, then identify a set of pre-agreed triggers for "okay, serious shit is happening" [super-pandemics? >25% unemployment? something involving slaughterbots?], and pre-agree that we become much more open-minded to the slowdown or pause thing if enough triggers come to pass within some timeframe. 2040 detractors (who clearly implicitly think that we'll see amazing speedup of progress from AI but think that what I call the "serious shit" category is overhyped) will accept expecting that the triggers don't come to pass, and AI worriers will accept expecting that they will. Pre-agreeing on the specific triggers means that once the triggers either hit or don't hit, there is stronger legitimacy around the idea that one side's worldview turned out more correct and we should be more inclined toward their program.

If I were @elonmusk (or zuck, or...) I would re-tool twitter much more heavily into being a platform for helping to identify and make these kinds of grand win-win deals, so that we can bypass big-country governments and big-company CEOs and big nonprofit intellectuals and give more people a voice in the discussion. It's possibly one of the best things that social media _could_ do for humanity if it wanted to.

But again, maybe this is also naive. Actually, probably it's naive.

But currently, I see zero plans for how to deal with an ASI transition that are not naive. Perhaps humanity is stuck with a choice between naive and naive squared (or maybe even naive squared and naive cubed), so I feel inclined to cut some slack to people who are trying.

[andreibratucu🦇🔊 @andreibratucu]

Aici lista intreaga cu voturile parlamentarilor romani

Ca sa stiti cui sa "multumiti" :)

[Ivo Toniut @IvoTONIUT]

Isn't it time to put an end to a situation where a handful of witches can do whatever they please with your rights and your money?

Who are these women? How is it possible that, among the 220 MILLION MEN living in the EU, one cannot find four men with the balls to replace them!?

[Isaac @isaacrrr7]

Actualmente viven en Europa 50 millones de musulmanes.

Había menos de 500.000 en 2000, hace sólo 26 años.

No es teoría del reemplazo, es reemplazo. Es la conquista de un continente sin disparar una sola bala.

Es un colapso de la civilización.

[Dr. Maalouf ‏ @realMaalouf]

Remember, all Muslim countries in the Middle East were once Christian.

When the Muslim invaders came, they killed the men, raped the women, enslaved the children.

That’s how those countries became Islamic. And that’s exactly what they’re trying to do in Europe and America now.

[Max @kudela_maxim]

Remember: Chat Control didn't fall from the sky. Von der Leyen's Commission proposed it in 2022, refused to withdraw it after two rejections by Parliament, and pressured MEPs right up to the vote.

An unelected executive that treats a parliamentary "no" as a scheduling problem is doing more damage to trust in the EU than any eurosceptic ever could.

[Deethz @NullFUD]

the craziest thing is 314 voted NOT to have chat control
276 voted to HAVE chat control

and now we have chat control

democracy heck yeah