GROK POSTS INSANE 1,343,408% GROWTH IN A YEAR
From August 2024 to July 2025, Grok just pulled off the biggest leap in AI history.
Visits exploded from 510K to 687M , a record, shattering 1,343,408% growth rate.
It now averages nearly 130M visits per month, more than double the previous quarter.
Users are sticking too, clocking 15 minutes 43 seconds per session, topping even ChatGPT and Gemini.
Ranked #2 out of 10,500 AI tools, Grok has become the fastest-rising chatbot on the planet.
Source: @Prashant_1722@elonmusk
Grok is evolving much faster than any other AI.
If this rate of progress continues, @xAI will outpace other AI companies by a significant margin.
App upgrades are roughly on par with internal upgrades.
Do not start with fundamentals. This is an awful approach to learning.
Start with so-called "advanced" topics and ask questions until every term/concept is understood.
This is the correct, rigorous, scientific way to learn, because the advanced topics are embedded in larger, more convoluted, more abstracted constructs. This embedding is what gives the individual pieces their *meaning*.
Foundational studies have removed this embedding, and present only the isolated, sterile pieces. They have no meaning. They have no context.
The notion that students will piece together fundamentals into some eventual synthesis down the road is absolutely incorrect. It is literally information-theoretically obtuse.
Children don't learn language using pieces. They mumble *fully*. They are never not fully embracing the complexity. It is the juxtaposition between their naive attempts and the full picture that imbues their mind with learning.
Prerequisites are the dumbest approach to learning. It is utterly indefensible using any scientific argument. The basics-to-advanced directionality is diametrically opposed to how information is encoded, comprehended and used.
Prerequisites are why most computer scientists and whiteboard exam-passers can't make software themselves; they can only be cogs in a company. It's why a Princeton math PhD can write the update rule for gradient descent but can't draw the actual process with circles and lines on a damn chalkboard (true story).
Idiot level stuff because their learning was all basics to advanced. They never defined terms and concepts in an embedded fashion. It was all disconnected. Meaningless muscle memory with no understanding.
It does not work both ways. Only pieces that are seen inside the bigger picture are understood.
Do not start with fundamentals.
@MarioNawfal Unlike Perplexity’s $50M fund for AI startups, xAI’s focus on groundbreaking AI like Grok 3 positions it as a leader in pushing humanity’s understanding of the universe, not just funding incremental innovation
Grok-3's potential is absolutely mind-blowing, but these usage limits are a real buzzkill! 🤯 Hoping @xAI unlocks truly unlimited DeepSearch & Think for Premium+ users (to make sense of the recent substantial price increase) after the free trial period. Let's unleash this beast!