Valeriy M

[Valeriy M @ValeriyM11]

@gozefinagold Ваш бизнес закрывается...?
В Украине города, дома разрушаються, люди лишаются жилья, жизни.
О чём эта "куропатка" тужыт?

[Madz @B23920Bowden]

“Donald Trump has been the worst president this country has ever had. And, I don't say that hyperbolically. He is. But he is a consequential president. And, he has brought this country in three short years to a place of weakness that is simply unimaginable if you were pondering where we are today from the day where Barack Obama left office. And, there were a lot of us on that day who were deeply skeptical and very worried about what a Trump presidency would be. But this is a moment of unparalleled national humiliation, of weakness.”
"When you listen to the President, these are the musings of an imbecile. An idiot. And I don't use those words to name call. I use them because they are the precise words of the English language to describe his behavior. His comportment. His actions. We've never seen a level of incompetence, a level of ineptitude so staggering on a daily basis by anybody in the history of the country who’s ever been charged with substantial responsibilities.”
"It's just astonishing that this man is president of the United States. The man, the con man, from New York City. Many bankruptcies, failed businesses, a reality show, that branded him as something that he never was. A successful businessman. Well, he's the President of the United States now, and the man who said he would make the country great again. And he's brought death, suffering, and economic collapse on truly an epic scale."
"And, let's be clear. This isn't happening in every country around the world. This place. Our place. Our home. Our country. The United States. We are the epicenter. We are the place where you're the most likely to die from this disease. We're the ones with the most shattered economy. And we are, because of the fool that sits in the Oval Office behind the Resolute Desk.

[Rohoza (Дев'ятий) Mykhailo 🇺🇦🇱🇹🇨🇦 @Oct7NeverForget]

Meloni Refuses to End Support for Ukraine: “I Understand I May Lose Votes, but I Will Not Change My Position.”

Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni has made a firm statement amid growing debates over military assistance to Kyiv, rising living costs, and increased defense spending.

In an interview for journalist Bruno Vespa's new book, History of the Second Republic, scheduled for release on November 2, the Italian prime minister acknowledged that supporting Ukraine could cost her some voters.

“I fully understand that our support for Ukraine may come at a political cost. That even among our own voters, there are people who disagree with it. But I have no intention of changing my position.”

Meloni emphasized that her decisions are guided primarily by Italy's national interests.

“I support Ukraine not simply for the sake of Ukrainians. I do it for Italy.”

According to Meloni, an international order in which military force alone determines what is right poses a serious threat to her country.

She urged people to consider the consequences of a possible Ukrainian defeat.

“If we had allowed Ukraine to be easily conquered, could we really be certain that Moscow would stop there rather than move further?”

Meloni also addressed the possibility of Russia attacking a NATO member state. In such a scenario, she explained, NATO allies would face a choice between responding militarily and effectively abandoning their collective defense commitments, potentially threatening the very existence of the Alliance.

“I support Ukraine because all the other scenarios are potentially even more frightening,” the prime minister stated.

She also praised the resistance of Ukrainian society, describing it as an expression of patriotism.

“There is a people, a history, an identity that refuse to be destroyed. I would call that patriotism. And as a woman of the political right, I cannot help but admire it.”

Her remarks come amid disagreements within Italy's governing coalition. Matteo Salvini, leader of the League party, has previously called for an end to further military and financial assistance to Ukraine, while Meloni continues to insist on supporting Kyiv.

[Mario @PawlowskiMario]

What The Hell Is Happening In Poland? Let Me Explain 🇵🇱🇪🇺

For everyone outside Poland wondering what the hell is going on, especially after seeing all the dramatic posts about a supposed coup, you need to understand something about Polish politics.

I was born in Poland. I remember communism. I remember what Poland was like before it became the country it is today. And watching this political circus unfold is infuriating.

From 2015 to 2023, Poland was governed by Law and Justice (PiS), Jarosław Kaczyński’s national-conservative party. During those eight years, PiS pushed through controversial changes to the judicial system, including the Constitutional Tribunal, Poland’s equivalent of a constitutional court. Those changes triggered years of disputes with the European Union over judicial independence and the rule of law.

In 2023, Polish voters brought a new parliamentary majority to power, led by Donald Tusk. His coalition promised to repair the damage and restore the independence of Poland’s institutions. But there was a problem. PiS had left behind people in powerful judicial positions, and the presidency became another obstacle to those reforms.

Fast-forward to October 30, 2026. A judge announced the suspension of Constitutional Tribunal president Bogdan Święczkowski, a PiS-era appointee who had refused to seat judges elected by the current parliamentary majority. The legality of that suspension is now disputed.

President Karol Nawrocki, a nationalist closely aligned with PiS, interrupted his trip to Africa, returned to Warsaw, and accused the government of attempting a coup. Police were deployed, protesters gathered, and the entire situation exploded across social media.

Now, here’s the part many people outside Poland don’t understand.

This confrontation didn’t suddenly appear out of nowhere. It’s the continuation of a constitutional crisis that began more than a decade ago. The current government says it is trying to restore the rule of law. PiS and Nawrocki say the government is violating it. The courts and legal procedures, not social-media hysteria, must ultimately determine what is lawful.

And then there’s Nawrocki himself.

Just days ago, a former coworker from the Grand Hotel in Sopot testified in court that Nawrocki had suggested she could earn extra money by bringing women to hotel guests. She described an incident that made her suspect he was involved in procuring prostitutes. Nawrocki denies the allegations and has sued the publisher that reported them. No court has established that he engaged in pimping, but the testimony is real, public, and deeply serious.

There have also been controversies surrounding his past involvement in an arranged fight and his acquisition of an apartment.

And while all this is happening, Kaczyński and his political allies are escalating their confrontational rhetoric about the European Union.

Here’s something they should remember: according to a 2026 CBOS survey, 82% of Poles support Poland remaining in the EU.

Eighty-two percent.

Poland has benefited enormously from European integration, investment, infrastructure development, freedom of movement, and access to the European market. Anyone who remembers Poland before 1989 can appreciate just how extraordinary its transformation has been.

Now, I’m not claiming every criticism of the EU means someone wants to leave it. But I am deeply concerned about politicians who repeatedly turn European institutions into enemies while presenting themselves as Poland’s only true patriots.

And I’m equally concerned about how easily this political confrontation can be exploited by Russian propaganda. Moscow benefits when European societies distrust their democratic institutions, fight among themselves, and turn against European cooperation. That doesn’t prove every inflammatory post is Russian propaganda. It means we should be extremely careful about who is spreading what, and why.

I have absolutely no patience for nationalism dressed up as patriotism, especially in a country that knows what Russian domination looks like.

Poland fought too hard to escape Moscow’s influence and build its place in democratic Europe.

Patriotism is not loyalty to Kaczyński, Nawrocki, Tusk, or any political party. Patriotism is loyalty to Poland, its Constitution, its democratic institutions, and its people.

And no politician should be above the law.

Here is a video of very aggressive Polish President Nawrocki forcing his way into Constitutional Tribunal pushing woman aside. His old instincts of hooliganism and pimp is kicking in.

[El Lunes @Ellunes]

Trei tancuri petroliere aflate pe lista neagră și care transportă 140.000 de tone de combustibil rusesc fac cercuri în Atlantic.

Casa Albă a sunat traderii americani să cumpere motorina lui Putin, dar literalmente zero cumpărători au răspuns la telefon.

În panică din cauza prețurilor la combustibil care au explodat chiar înainte de alegerile de la mijloc de mandat, Casa Albă a încheiat pe 9 octombrie un acord cu Kremlinul prin care sunt ocolite interdicțiile de import. Trump se aștepta ca traderii de pe Wall Street să se repeadă la motorina rusească ieftină. În schimb, aceștia au tratat marfa ca pe deșeuri nucleare.
De ce? Pentru că aspectul legal al afacerii le poate fi fatal. Congresul a incriminat în mod explicit importurile de petrol rusesc în 2022.

O scutire pe hârtie din partea Trezoreriei SUA nu are nicio greutate împotriva unei interdicții a Congresului, ceea ce înseamnă că orice comerciant care se atinge de motorina sau benzina rusească riscă închisoare federală și citații din partea Congresului.

Haosul de pe ocean este de un absurd kafkian.

Petrolierul Agioi Fanendes a plecat din Sankt Petersburg cu destinația New York, dar s-a oprit în mijlocul oceanului și așteaptă „noi instrucțiuni”, traducere maritimă pentru „plutim fără țintă pentru că nimeni nu vrea să ne cumpere marfa”.

Restul flotei din umbră a lui Putin nu se simte nici ea mai bine. Talisman este inclus pe lista neagră de Washington și Europa, în timp ce Leruo este interzis în întreaga UE, Marea Britanie și Canada. Cu toate acestea, oamenii lui Trump de la Casa Albă au înroșit telefoanele în încercarea de a ancora navele rusești în porturile americane.

Însă reacția Wall Street-ului a fost rece ca gheața. Chiar și cu Moscova oferind reduceri substanțiale, traderii de petrol de pe piața gri s-au ascuns pe sub birouri. Foști oficiali ai Trezoreriei SUA au avertizat deja că orice contact cu aceste nave este sinucidere corporativă, așa că 140.000 de tone de motorină plutesc în Atlantic fără un singur cumpărător la orizont.

În plus, Congresul a apucat barosul.

Democrații și câțiva republicani au avertizat cumpărătorii cu privire la riscul comiterii unei infracțiuni federale, în timp ce senatorul Blumenthal a trimis scrisori de avertisment direct către proprietarii navelor, cerându-le să facă imediat drumul înapoi.

Guvernatoarea statului New Jersey, Mikie Sherrill, fost ofițer de marină și procuror federal, a numit afacerea lui Trump „coruptă și ilegală”. Ea a pregătit deja o serie de măsuri pentru a bloca terminalele principale de combustibil de pe coasta de est de la Bayonne, Linden, Carteret, Perth Amboy și Port Reading.

Cu porturile americane închise și amenințările Congresului planând deasupra capetelor, Washingtonul și Moscova se agită frenetic în căutarea unei soluții de ieșire din încurcătură. Specialiștii din energie spun că, fără un singur cumpărător american dispus să riște, motorina rusă respinsă va trebui descărcată în America de Sud la prețuri derizorii, în pierdere.

Planul disperat al Casei Albe pentru a ocoli legea federală, a scădea prețurile la motorină înainte de alegerile din 3 noiembrie și a direcționa bani către Moscova se pare că a eșuat. La fel ca navele din flota fantomă a lui Putin, care rătăcesc pe mări și oceane, fără niciun port unde să acosteze.

(Sebastian Duma / FB)

[Olena Rohoza @OlenaRohoza]

One of the biggest problems with some Western leaders is that they still haven't understood the true nature of Vladimir Putin. This man, consumed by countless personal insecurities and complexes, is, first and foremost, a coward. And second, he understands only brute force.

I became convinced of this on two occasions.

The first was in 2015, when Turkey shot down a Russian military aircraft that had violated its airspace. Putin initially threw a tantrum, accusing Ankara of provocation and declaring that the Turks wouldn't get away with it by simply losing their tomato exports. Erdoğan, however, invited Putin to come to Istanbul for talks if he had any complaints. Putin never went. Eventually, the conflict faded away, and relations between the two countries were gradually restored.

The second occasion came in Syria, when American forces annihilated a group of Russian mercenaries attempting to seize an oil facility near Khasham in Deir ez-Zor province. Once again, Putin backed down, swallowed the humiliation, and quietly buried the incident.

After these two textbook examples, Putin became considerably more cautious about confronting either Turkey or the United States directly.

And this is precisely why I believe Putin will never face Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a genuine confrontation. First, because he is a coward. Second, because he would have no answers to Zelenskyy's questions. And third, because he might even be terrified that Zelenskyy would kill him right there, in front of the cameras, on live television. 😂

For the same reason, Putin has never participated in genuine presidential debates against real political opponents such as Alexei Navalny or Boris Nemtsov, both of whom were killed. Nor has he ever faced a truly independent press conference where, instead of obedient Kremlin propagandists, he would have to answer uncomfortable questions from journalists like Michael Naki or Yevgeny Kiselyov.

If I were an adviser to Alexander Stubb, who until today seemed to me one of Europe's most sensible leaders, I would remind him of one simple thing: there should be no conversations with Putin. This former bullied little nobody from the backstreets of St. Petersburg interprets every attempt at dialogue as weakness.

That is why today's talks involving Stubb, Jonas Gahr Støre, and the coward in the Kremlin are, in my opinion, a serious mistake. They merely hand Putin another propaganda victory before a Russian population that seems to have largely surrendered to collective madness.

No negotiations. No heartfelt conversations. Only devastating sanctions, relentless pressure, and concrete actions against Russia.

As for nuclear weapons, I believe those threats will remain the empty rhetoric of Kremlin propagandists. Putin loves himself far too much to risk his own survival. Just look at the additional air defenses surrounding his residences.

Even strikes against Moscow might leave him indifferent. There is only one thing he truly cares about: his own life. And to preserve it, he has already dragged his entire country into the gutter.

Meanwhile, much of Russian society seems willing to endure almost anything, provided the bloodshed continues and the familiar refrain survives: "We've been through worse! We'll survive this too! At least it's not the 1990s!"

This, unfortunately, reflects a particular feature of Russia's political and social mentality — Russian in the sense of the state and its historical culture, not ethnicity.

That is why I insist: no more conversations. Only actions. Preferably asymmetric ones.

Yet many European politicians still fail to understand the extraordinary moral monster they are dealing with, or how perfectly Putin embodies the darkest instincts and historical ambitions of Russian imperial society.

God willing, one day they will understand.

And to paraphrase Pyotr Chaadayev:

"Perhaps God invented Russia to show humanity how not to live."

[СВЯТА РУСЬ @rus_svata15287]

Ольга - діджей з міста Чернігів. Ми переможемо. Все відбудуємо. Все побудуємо. Все відновимо. Слава Великому незламному, вільному народу України !!!

[Ruslan Volkov @RuslanVolkov25]

Послушать деда - так на нас 30 лет без перерыва нападают. Каждую секунду. НАТО под дверью, ресурсы хотят выкопать, землю отнять, всех поработить, а нас спасет только очередная война, репрессии и затягивание поясов. А теперь открываем глаза и смотрим на реальность.
Кто-нибудь блядь хоть раз за эти 30 лет пролетел на дроне в сторону Москвы? Напал на границу? Запустил хоть одну гибридную атаку? Да нахер мы никому не уперлись со своими заборными страшилками. Всё, абсолютно всё, что горит, рушится и взрывается последние годы - прилетело и началось исключительно из-за решений самой же Москвы.
Но самый сюр и лютая шиза даже не в этом.
Нам десятилетиями ссут в уши про «врагов, которые хотят отжать наши ресурсы». И при этом они же сами эти ресурсы качают в трехсменку, сосут из земли всё до последней капли и со свистом продают... барабанная дробь... ТЕМ ЖЕ САМЫМ «ВРАГАМ»!

План просто «гениальный»:

- Орать, что Запад хочет спердеть нашу нефть и газ.

- Продавать Западу эту нефть и газ за доллары.

- На эти же доллары пок��пать у этого же Запада виллы, яхты и замки на Лазурном берегу.

Отправлять туда же учиться и жить своих детей.
Возвращаться в телик и с серьезным рылом рассказывать нищему населению с туалетом на улице, что враг у ворот и надо сплотиться вокруг вождя.
Это же абсолютный, ничем не прикрытый цинизм. Враги у них - везде, но деньги они почему-то держат у врагов, дома покупают у врагов, а воевать за этот бред отправляют обычных пацанов. Классический разводняк, на который до сих пор кто-то ведется.

[Manunya @ManyaS78844]

Ху із ганчаренко ? ПІДАР !!!!!!!

[Olena Rohoza @OlenaRohoza]

“I NEVER THOUGHT I WOULD HAVE TO SAY THIS”: VIRGIN GROUP FOUNDER RICHARD BRANSON ISSUES A POWERFUL STATEMENT SUPPORTING UKRAINE 🇬🇧🇺🇦

British billionaire, philanthropist, and Virgin Group founder Sir Richard Branson has reportedly published an unusually forceful statement on LinkedIn.

Branson, whose business empire includes Virgin Atlantic, Virgin Galactic, and hundreds of other companies, reportedly directed his message at international business leaders, investors, and European governments.

FULL TEXT OF THE STATEMENT ATTRIBUTED TO RICHARD BRANSON:

“I never thought I would have to say this in my lifetime, but it is 2026, and the Trump administration has become an appeaser of autocrats and dictators.

What is it about Putin that makes President Trump so eager to please him? The slowing and restricting of Starlink/Starshield operations, along with the inexplicable failure to provide advance warnings of Russian missile launches, have already resulted in Ukrainian civilians dying needlessly. How much worse can this get?

The one thing that has become absolutely clear is that European leaders must overcome their initial shock at Trump's actions and take the initiative themselves.

Both Europe's freedom and Ukraine's sovereignty are at stake. Our responsibility is to ensure that the free world is not destroyed before our very eyes.”

A WARNING FROM A GLOBAL BUSINESS LEADER

As the founder of Virgin Group, Branson is sending a message to the international corporate community: remaining silent about the appeasement of autocrats is no longer acceptable when global stability and security are at risk.

A DIRECT CALL FOR EUROPE TO TAKE THE LEAD

The central message attributed to Branson is that European governments and business leaders must stop relying on the unpredictable policies of the White House.

European countries must take greater responsibility for providing decisive military and financial assistance to Ukraine, investing in their own defense industries, and protecting democratic values.

A LONG-STANDING SUPPORTER OF UKRAINE

Sir Richard Branson was among the prominent international business figures who personally visited Ukraine after Russia launched its full-scale invasion.

He is also an official ambassador of UNITED24, Ukraine's fundraising platform.

If authenticated, this LinkedIn statement would represent another significant intervention by Branson in support of Ukraine and an appeal to the global business community to defend European security and Ukrainian sovereignty.

[Mykhailo Rohoza @MykhailoRohoza]

There is a Russian pro-war Z-propagandist and journalist named Dmitry Borisenko, who was apparently not appreciated by his own country and fled to Serbia.

During one of his broadcasts, he openly explained what the Russian authorities fear most. Not protests. Not sanctions. But another Prigozhin.

I believe this could be one of the most promising directions for Ukraine to focus on.

Here are his words, translated into English:

“I'll tell you about the greatest fear of our security services. Someone told me this in confidence.

The greatest fear of our security forces today is not domestic protests, which they can control. The political landscape has been cleared. Opposition leaders have been forced into exile or imprisoned. From the standpoint of civil society, the authorities have the situation under control.

Their greatest fear is Prigozhin 2.0.

That is their biggest nightmare: that suddenly some brigade commander or division commander experiences a change of mind, along with his subordinates, or that something begins to develop collectively among them. Like the Decembrists, they might gradually develop their ideas and eventually organize some kind of secret society.

The threat will not come from civil society, according to the security services and political strategists. Political consultants are busy spending their budgets, while the security services assess the situation more realistically.

Their greatest fear is Prigozhin 2.0.

As I was told, hypothetically, if just one brigade turned around, within 24 hours another 30,000, 40,000, or even 50,000 people could join it. And these would be armed men. Other military units would begin switching sides. Police officers would start defecting as well.

They told me this directly: 'We understand perfectly well what would happen. We saw what happened with Prigozhin. The police opened the roads and stepped aside. His forces entered Rostov through a country road and reached the headquarters of the military grouping stationed there. They entered without firing a single shot.'

What does that tell us?

Remember, that was back in 2023. Even then, the situation was difficult, but the population was not nearly as angry as it is today, and the economic situation was not nearly as severe.

They understand perfectly well that if something like that happened now, the outcome would be completely different.

Five days, and everything would be over. Do you understand? That is what they are saying. That is their fear. Their real fear.”

And that raises a serious question: What happens to Putin's regime if the next rebellion comes not from unarmed civilians, but from the very soldiers and commanders who are supposed to defend it?

[Mykhailo Rohoza @MykhailoRohoza]

Zelenskyy: “Trump Is Demanding That I Surrender to Putin”

Finally, the moment has come when we can stop pretending to be diplomatically polite, carefully choosing our words, and acting as though we are dealing with some sophisticated peace negotiations rather than the blatant coercion of a victim into surrender.

For the first time, Zelenskyy has said out loud what many have long suspected: according to him, the Trump administration is taking steps that are forcing Ukraine to surrender to Russia.

“I don't want to think that our American partners believe it is possible to end the war faster at Ukraine's expense. But that is exactly what it looks like.”

Trump is demanding capitulation!

Pay attention to that last sentence. No hysteria, no diplomatic scandal, not even an accusation. Just a statement of fact from a man who has spent far too long trying to convince himself that his ally really is an ally.

And indeed, a rather interesting picture is emerging.

Russia bombs Ukrainian cities, while Washington demands that Kyiv stop striking Russian oil refineries. Ukraine purchases American missiles for its Patriot air defense systems, but according to Zelenskyy, deliveries are being delayed. Restrictions on satellite communications are emerging, making it significantly more difficult for Ukrainian troops to conduct military operations.

And all of this is accompanied by endless talk about peace.

What kind of peace, gentlemen?

Imagine a robber breaking into your home, murdering your loved ones, setting your bedroom on fire, and then a police officer arriving at the scene. But instead of arresting the criminal, the officer demands that you immediately put down your gun because the shooting is disturbing the neighbors' sleep.

And, as a friendly gesture, he promises to help the robber get more gasoline.

That, in my opinion, is exactly what American diplomacy looks like today.

Trump loves to repeat that he wants to stop the bloodshed. A wonderful desire. Yet somehow, almost all his demands are directed at the country defending itself, while the man who unleashed the largest European war of our time is offered negotiations, economic concessions, and yet another opportunity to bargain.

There is one inconvenient detail for Trump here.

Zelenskyy cannot sign Ukraine's capitulation for the simple reason that Ukraine does not belong to him.

It is not a hotel that can be sold together with its guests, nor a golf course that can be handed over to creditors to settle debts.

Behind this country stand millions of people who have buried their loved ones, lost their homes, endured occupation, torture, and Russian prisons.

Trump can put as much pressure on Zelenskyy as he wants. But forcing Ukrainians to voluntarily recognize Russia's right to determine their fate is an entirely different matter.

The most disgusting part of this story is not even the pressure on Ukraine itself, but the attempt to present capitulation as a great humanitarian achievement for which humanity should thank the American president.

Putin demands Ukrainian land.

Trump demands peace.

And Ukrainians are expected to pay the price for both demands.

You know, history has seen deals like this before. They were usually signed by people who were absolutely convinced that someone else would have to pay the price.

And every single time, there was some solemn gentleman announcing that he had finally brought peace to Europe.

The only difference is that this time, Ukraine is still holding its weapons.

And it has no intention of laying them down.

© Valeriy Bochkov

[Manunya @ManyaS78844]

Прошу максимального репосту цього відео, щоб усі побачили, хто такий Ремонт Петрович. Він уміє маніпулювати, ображати й обзивати блогерів без фактів і доказів. Хочу, щоб люди побачили, хто веде цю сторінку, і добре подумали, перш ніж мати з ним справу

[Kateri Seraphina @KateriSeraphina]

Personne n’aurait imaginé qu’il se dresserait un jour contre le véritable mal ou qu’il s’aventurerait dans les recoins les plus sombres du monde humain. Pendant des années, Hollywood s’est moqué d’Ashton Kutcher.
À leurs yeux, il n’était qu’un acteur de sitcoms, un beau gosse en couverture des magazines, le visage associé à des émissions de caméra cachée comme Punk’d. On le trouvait charmant et drôle, mais personne ne le prenait vraiment au sérieux.
Et pourtant, ce malentendu s’est révélé être une bénédiction.
En 2009, Ashton Kutcher a discrètement cofondé Thorn, une organisation dont l’objectif n’était ni d’organiser de somptueuses soirées sur les tapis rouges ni de donner des leçons de morale. Son ambition était radicale et directe : développer des technologies de pointe pour traquer les trafiquants d’enfants.
Il n’y eut ni grande campagne médiatique ni opération de communication tapageuse. Il a simplement décidé d’agir là où tant d’autres détournaient le regard.
Kutcher s’est plongé corps et âme dans les profondeurs obscures du monde numérique. Pendant des années, il a appris comment les prédateurs en ligne opèrent, comment ils communiquent, comment ils échangent des contenus abominables derrière des écrans fermés et comment ils échappent à la justice.
Il ne s’est pas contenté de financer le projet. Il a travaillé directement avec des ingénieurs en informatique, des experts en cybersécurité et des services internationaux chargés de l’application de la loi.
Ensemble, ils ont développé des outils d’intelligence artificielle capables d’analyser le Web, de détecter des signaux suspects, de cartographier des réseaux clandestins et d’identifier les victimes avant qu’il ne soit trop tard.
Il n’était pas simplement une célébrité chargée de prononcer un discours soigneusement préparé. Il était au cœur même des opérations. Il s’asseyait avec les développeurs, élaborait des stratégies et analysait des données brutes.
Il a assumé toute la lourde responsabilité de ce combat.
En 2017, Ashton Kutcher s’est présenté devant le Sénat américain pour témoigner sur la traite des êtres humains. De nombreux élus s’attendaient à entendre un discours classique de célébrité, rempli de formules émouvantes et de mots soigneusement choisis pour frapper les esprits.
Mais il leur a présenté des faits concrets, des données issues des systèmes informatiques et des cartes détaillées de réseaux criminels à l’échelle mondiale. Il s’est exprimé d’une voix calme et posée, dont la force dépassait celle des discours les plus tonitruants.
« J’ai vu des choses qu’aucun être humain ne devrait jamais avoir à voir », a-t-il déclaré devant les sénateurs, la voix brisée par une émotion sincère. « J’ai regardé des images vidéo montrant un enfant du même âge que le mien se faire violenter sexuellement par un homme. Et lorsqu’on voit cela, on comprend que ne rien faire n’est plus une option. »
Un silence profond s’est installé dans la salle.
Ce n’était pas une mise en scène. C’était le poids accablant porté par un homme qui avait contemplé l’abîme et choisi de le combattre.
Depuis, les logiciels développés par Thorn ont aidé les forces de l’ordre à identifier des centaines de milliers de victimes à travers le monde. Ils ont soutenu des opérations policières dans des dizaines de pays et permis de réduire certaines durées d’enquête, qui se comptaient autrefois en semaines, à quelques heures.
Mais surtout, ces outils ont contribué à ramener de véritables enfants en lieu sûr, auprès de ceux qui pouvaient les protéger.
Pourtant, on l’entend rarement s’en vanter dans les émissions de télévision en soirée. Ashton Kutcher ne publie pas de photos d’enfants secourus, ne cherche pas à tirer profit médiatiquement des arrestations et ne court pas après les applaudissements.
Il choisit délibérément de rester dans l’ombre, laissant la technologie et les enquêteurs parler à sa place.
Dans le monde du divertissement, il reste peut-être cet acteur décontracté que l’on associe aux sitcoms. Mais pour les prédateurs qui sévissent sur Internet, il représente un adversaire redoutable : un homme qui a retourné contre eux leurs propres outils numériques pour en faire des pièges.
Il n’a pas incarné un super-héros sur un écran de cinéma.
Il est devenu quelque chose de bien plus puissant dans la vie réelle : un homme prêt à s’enfoncer dans les ténèbres pour permettre à d’autres d’en sortir et de retrouver la lumière.
Aujourd’hui, quelque part dans le monde, un enfant dort paisiblement dans son propre lit, serrant contre lui son animal en peluche préféré, sans se douter des algorithmes complexes qui ont contribué à le sauver.
Il ne connaît pas le nom d’Ashton Kutcher, et peut-être ne le connaîtra-t-il jamais.
Mais parce qu’un homme a refusé de détourner les yeux, cet enfant a désormais la possibilité de vivre une histoire dont la fin sera heureuse.
#AshtonKutcher #Thorn #ProtégeonsLesEnfants #LespoirEnAction #HérosDuQuotidien

[Даниэль Арнав דניאל ארנב 🇮🇱 @sponger86129115]

Из поста @EenExWokeDocent
Видео. Европейцы не знают, что их ждёт (перевод с английского): 
"Европейцы очень скоро проснутся в настоящем кошмаре. Очень, блядь, скоро!
Есть люди, похожие на меня: с бородой, с тёмными волосами. И они бегут от того ужаса, который несёт с собой ислам. Понимаете?
Например, я наполовину немец, наполовину египтянин. Родился в Германии.
Но есть и другие люди, которые выглядят точно так же, как я.
Только они не бежали от этого ужаса. Они привозят этот ужас с собой, вместе с исламом.
И, если уж говорить совершенно откровенно, таких большинство. А вовсе не наоборот!
Вы, блядь, даже не представляете, что сейчас дремлет и просто ждёт, пока не будет достигнута критическая масса.
Если вы, ��ибералы, не хотите слушать какого-то белого мужика, тогда послушайте меня! Хорошо?
Потому что я вам говорю: я знаю, что это за люди!
Я там был. Я прожил там целый год.
Они вас ненавидят!
И вы однажды проснётесь в настоящем, блядь, кошмаре, когда будет пройдён определённый рубеж.
Я называю это критической массой. В смысле рождаемости и всего такого.
И тогда вы уже не сможете себя защитить. К сожалению.
А с другой стороны, сюда прибывают очень, очень агрессивные люди!
Они не принимают вашу культуру!
Они не признают прав ваших женщин!
Они вообще ничего из этого не принимают!
Они хотят всё это уничтожить! Они хотят уничтожить вас самих!
А вы слепы! Вы просто не хотите этого видеть!
Поверьте мне, это будет кошмар. Настоящий кровавый, блядь, кошмар!
Очнитесь, нахрен! Я совершенно, блядь, серьёзно!". - это его слова.

Простой пример: Мусульманское население, например, в Нидерландах сейчас составляет 5%. Говорит CBS. Значит, ничего страшного. Но это подсчитано с 18+. Если включить 0–18-летних, то это 15%. И эта пропорция в следующем поколении уже будет 30%, потому что мусульмане просто-напросто заводят значительно больше детей. Западные общества стареют, рождаемость низкая. Проблема Европы, на мой взгляд, ещё и в том, что молодёжь слишком увлечена либеральными и левыми идеями. Работать не хочет, хочет всего и сразу. П��льша, Венгрия и другие страны твёрдо выступают против разрешения мусульманам въезжать в свои страны с 2015 года... правительства, которые допустили эту массовую иммиграцию, являются соучастниками большого процесса. Это дело максимум лет 50-и. И вы не узнаете западную Европу вообще. 
Читайте Коран, там чётко всё написано: "Сражайтесь с теми из людей Писания, которые не веруют ни в Аллаха, ни в Последний день, которые не считают запретным то, что запретили Аллах и Его Посланник, которые не исповедуют истинную религию, пока они не станут собственноручно платить дань, оставаясь униженными. ( https://t.co/X0ugoioFA7 )"

[Valeriy M @ValeriyM11]

@veiledleaks Почему эта мусульманская женщина приехала в светскую страну?
Ей плохо жилось н�� своей родине?
Почему она желает жить так, как было в её стране?
Осталась бы на своей родине, где обычаи, порядки ей понятны и при��млемы.. Но нет. Хочет жить в Европе, но по своим шариатским принципам.

[buchdruk @buchdruk]

Pues tiene 2 opciones muy claras
1ª- quitarse el hiyab
2ª-irse a un país musulmán de los 45 que hay y así poder trabajar.

[Анатолій Штефан (Штірліц) @Shtirlitz53]

Всі російські військови та силовики - вороги.

Навіть якщо вони не беруть безпосередню участь у бойових діях.

Немає «хороших», «нейтральних» чи «просто тих, хто виконує наказ».

​Будь-хто в російській формі, з російським шевроном — це ворог. Без винятків.

​Воєнна машина — це цілісний механізм.
• ​Силовик, який придушує протести, забезпечує стабільність режиму.
• ​Бухгалтер нараховує зарплату ��им, хто катує українців.
• ​Логіст організовує доставку снарядів.
• ​А звичайний строковик чи тиловик тримає систему, яка щодня вбиває українців.

​Кожен із них свідомо або мовчки став гвинтиком агресії. Вони обрали служити державі-терористу, отримувати від неї кошти й підтримувати її життєдіяльність.

​У цій війні немає сірої зони серед військових та силовиків ворога. Всі вони — частина однієї загрози, яка має бути знешкоджена та покарана.

Кожен з них — потенційний кат і ворог, який в будь-який момент може прийти за наказом на нашу землю.

[Petrenko AndryiⒸ (Ukraine) @PetrenkoAndryi]

Дивіться і слухайте, що зроблять росіяни з Україною, якщо її захоплять.

[СВЯТА РУСЬ @rus_svata15287]

Не прост��мо. Не пробачимо......