Pi Network has run one of the most effective communication strategies in crypto.
It launched on Pi Day 2019 with a simple promise, one tap a day to mine crypto on your phone, and grew through invite codes that turned every user into an unpaid marketer.
The Stanford credentials of its founders added a halo, and a phase system of Testnet, Enclosed Network and Open Network kept the community looking ahead.
This year alone, node operators were told to complete Protocol 23 by May 15 and Protocol 26 by August 11, with another upgrade still planned.
Each step may be necessary, but a roadmap that always points to the next phase means the present never has to be judged.
Meanwhile, answers are scarce. The 2025 hackathon closed submissions on October 15, and winners were not named until December 11.
Pi has run hackathons in 2021, 2023, 2024 and 2025, crowning roughly two dozen winners, yet it is hard to find a winning app that ordinary Pioneers use every week.
Public numbers on verified usage and real transactions are just as hard to find.
Now the first Pi Ecosystem Summit, November 17 to 19, promises demos, showcases and an all-new hackathon.
That assumes the problem is a shortage of apps, but the ecosystem already lists hundreds. What is missing is users who stay, merchants who accept Pi, and activity anyone can verify.
Pioneers should not walk away, but they should stop treating patience as a virtue in itself.
Ask which apps are alive, what the network is used for today, and what comes after the final upgrade. Trust that cannot be checked is only hope.
Great picks by Pi Network Ventures. But Pioneers should ask a different question: when do these wins show up inside Pi itself?
A sharp VC arm is not the same as a usable network. Eight years in, the portfolio is moving faster than the ecosystem.
Look at recent airdrop projects like @axisrobotics and @openmind_agi. Pi Network Ventures is proving to be the most effective blockchain VC fund right now.
CAEX Clears a Key Security Hurdle in Vietnam’s Crypto Pilot, and OKX Is Part of the Story
CAEX, a crypto asset exchange preparing to operate in Vietnam, has announced that it completed the Level 4 information system security assessment.
Vietnam’s Cybersecurity Department reviewed and approved the proposal to grant this standard, which is the highest technical security tier in the country.
The milestone matters because Level 4 compliance is a core requirement for joining Vietnam’s pilot program for regulated crypto asset exchanges.
There is an important caveat. CAEX has not yet received its operating license. The company says it will keep strengthening its technology components, operating procedures, and operational capacity, while working with the relevant authorities to meet all conditions for the pilot.
Trading services could only launch after CAEX satisfies the legal requirements and receives approval.
Where OKX Fits In
OKX Ventures has invested in CAEX and joined as a strategic partner.
The capital is intended to help CAEX meet the minimum charter capital requirement of 10 trillion VND, roughly 380 million USD, needed to take part in the five-year pilot.
Beyond funding, OKX is expected to support CAEX with technical infrastructure, security systems, and liquidity connectivity.
In simple terms, CAEX brings local presence and regulatory engagement, while OKX brings global exchange experience. If CAEX is approved, that combination could give Vietnam one of its first regulated venues for domestic crypto trading.
#CryptoArt
Pi’s Playbook: Eight Years of Selling the Future
Pi Network has been called many things, but one label rarely gets said out loud: Pi has run one of the most effective communication strategies in crypto.
In March 2019 it launched on Pi Day with a promise anyone could understand, and within months it had more than half a million sign-ups.
The hard part, building something people can actually use, has taken much longer. After nearly eight years, it is fair to ask whether the communication was ever meant to be accountable, or only to keep the community waiting.
The invite code
Pi grew through referrals. You needed a code to join, and inviting others raised your mining rate. This turned every user into an unpaid marketer, and it cost the Core Team almost nothing.
It also made leaving feel like a loss, because the more people you brought in, the more you had at stake. That is clever growth design.
It is also the reason critics keep comparing Pi’s structure to multi-level marketing, and the Core Team has never fully answered why the comparison should not stick.
The daily tap
“Mine crypto on your phone with one tap a day.” No hardware, no electricity bill, no technical knowledge. For millions of people in countries like Vietnam, Nigeria and the Philippines, this was their first contact with crypto.
The message was simple and warm, and it worked. But a daily tap is also a habit loop. Engagement was rewarded long before utility existed, and the community learned to measure Pi by how faithfully they opened the app, not by what the app let them do.
The Stanford halo
From the start, the founders were presented as Stanford PhDs. A September 2019 news report on the project quoted them and noted the user growth, and that single article has been passed around the community ever since.
It was a news story, not an endorsement, and the university did not provide resources to the project. Credentials can open doors, but they do not replace a product. Years later, the halo is still doing work that results should be doing.
The phase system
Beta, Testnet, Enclosed Network, Open Network. Every phase has been presented as a milestone, and every milestone has been followed by another one to wait for.
In 2026 alone, node operators have been told to complete Protocol 23 by May 15 and Protocol 26 by August 11, with a final planned upgrade still ahead. Each step might be technically necessary.
But a roadmap that always points to the next phase has a side effect: the present never has to be judged.
The silence
Perhaps the most telling habit is the gap between announcements and answers. The 2025 hackathon closed submissions on October 15, and winners were not named until December 11.
Public questions about verified usage, real transaction volume, or what happened to past winners get little direct response.
Headline user figures for Pi vary widely depending on who is counting, and the Core Team has not given the community numbers anyone can independently check. Silence is a communication strategy too. It protects expectations from facts.
The summit as a mirror
Now comes the first Pi Ecosystem Summit, November 17 to 19. The agenda promises platform releases and developer updates, developer demos, app showcases, developer conversations with the Core Team, and an all-new hackathon.
Look at what that list is made of: demos, showcases and a competition. Pi has already run hackathons in 2021, 2023, 2024 and 2025, plus monthly rounds, and crowned roughly two dozen winners.
Ask a typical Pioneer which winning app they used last week, and the silence is the answer. The summit’s agenda does not promise a report on any of them.
It does not promise transparent adoption metrics, a public tally of real-world payments, or a timeline for when ordinary users can spend Pi at an ordinary shop.
An event built around “more builders” and “more apps” assumes the bottleneck is supply.
The ecosystem already lists hundreds of Mainnet apps. 👇
#CryptoArt
The future is automated, and the vault at the end of the line is Bitcoin. If robots handle the work, scarce digital money could become the ultimate store of value.
#CryptoArt