🚨🚨 I was told this was just a conspiracy theory.
Turns out, it’s a 177-page United Nations report.
Couple this with birthright citizenship, and you have the takedown of the Constitutional Republic of the United States.
https://t.co/BhLoEutoFy…
In 1872, an eighteen-year-old girl arrived in a remote gold mining camp in Idaho. Legally, she was not even considered a human being. She did not have money, she did not speak a word of English.
She had been sold by her starving family in China during a famine, smuggled across the ocean, and bought by a wealthy Chinese saloon owner to work as a slave.
Her birth name was Lalu Nathoy, but the miners quickly gave her a simpler name: Polly.
The odds against Polly were overwhelming. Under American law at the time, she was invisible. The local government considered her presence illegal, and the men in the camp viewed her as property.
But Polly possessed a quiet determination that no one saw coming.
While she spent long, exhausting hours scrubbing heavy canvas pants on a washboard, she listened. She memorized every word spoken around her.
She learned English in complete silence, without anyone realizing it until it was too late to stop her.
Polly looked at the rugged miners around her and noticed something crucial.
They had gold in their pockets, but absolutely nothing else.
They had no one to feed them properly, no one to nurse them when they fell ill, and no one to make the brutal survival in the canyon bearable.
She saw a massive void in the market and decided to fill it.
She started cooking, sewing, and providing basic medical care. Every single coin she earned from these side jobs went straight into the dirt floor underneath her bed.
While the men squandered their fortunes on gambling and alcohol, Polly was buying something much more permanent: her independence.
Her life took a dramatic turn when a local saloon keeper named Charlie Bemis was shot in the face during a gambling dispute.
The camp doctor took one look at the horrific wound and declared him a dead man. Polly refused to accept that. She boiled water, sterilized a common crochet hook, and spent hours carefully extracting the bullet from Charlie’s skull.
Against all medical logic, Charlie lived.
Eventually, Polly and Charlie left the mining camp together and moved to Hells Canyon, the deepest river gorge in North America.
The Snake River cut through granite walls so steep that sunlight only hit the valley floor for a few hours a day. On a piece of land that seemed impossible to cultivate, Polly planted a fruit orchard.
She grew cherry and apple trees against the harsh rock cliffs.
When miners down the river got sick with fever or suffered terrible injuries, Polly took them in, becoming the ultimate healer of the canyon.
But her greatest battle was yet to come. In 1892, the U.S. government passed the Geary Act, a harsh law requiring all Chinese residents to carry certificates of residence or face immediate deportation. Polly had no papers.
A federal official traveled down into the canyon specifically to deport her. But when he arrived, he saw the thriving orchard, the vegetable gardens, and the sick men Polly was actively nursing back to health.
Realizing she was the backbone of the entire canyon community, the officer sat at her table, filled out the residence paperwork, and signed it as her witness instead of arresting her.
Polly Bemis lived in her canyon until her death in 1933 at the age of eighty. Today, her cabin is protected as a National Historic Site, and the cherry trees she planted still bear fruit.
Polly Bemis proved that when your spirit is strong enough, human law becomes nothing more than a suggestion.
She began her life in America with absolutely nothing, yet she chose to fill the harsh canyon with sweet fruit, warm meals, and a safe place for people who had no one else to care for them.
Enslaved, isolated, and stripped of every legal right, Polly faced a harsh wilderness and an even harsher society with absolutely no fear. She chose to fight back not with malice, but by building a life of profound purpose and protecting those around her.
Here, the brilliant @Miss_Snuffy from London explains Zoran Mamdani Mania better than anyone in America has so far done so…
This is a great, but terrifying speech…
😱🤦♂️🤮🥲
America’s ruling class has performed another miracle.
They took the most basic truths in human civilization ... crime needs punishment, borders need enforcement, schools should teach, welfare should be temporary, families matter, merit matters, and taxpayers should not be looted by professional parasites ... and somehow rebranded all of that as “extremism.”
Incredible work, really.
Apparently, a “compassionate” society is one where the violent repeat offender gets another chance, the victim gets a candlelight vigil, the taxpayer gets the bill, the schoolkid gets passed along illiterate, the fraudster gets a grant, the NGO gets another contract, the illegal alien gets services, and the working American gets told to shut up and be more inclusive.
What a beautiful system.
Soft justice did not stay in the courtroom. It metastasized. It became soft borders, soft schools, soft parenting, soft welfare, soft standards, soft men, and soft bureaucrats explaining why every obvious solution is “too harsh.”
Lock up predators? Cruel.
Deport illegals? Hateful.
End generational welfare? Lacking empathy.
Punish fraud? Complicated.
Restore merit? Problematic.
Teach kids to read? Probably colonialism by Tuesday.
A serious country protects the innocent from the guilty. A decaying country protects the guilty from consequences and makes the innocent finance the experiment.
That’s America’s real crisis.
Not poverty. Not “root causes.” Not another fake expert panel.
Consequences.
We stopped imposing them on the people destroying the country, so now the country imposes them on everyone else.
(article below)
🚨Barack Obama was using USAID to pretend to send money to a country for “aid” and instead laundering it to the Cayman Islands
He would then use that money to fund and train “Rent-a-Riots” for protests to overthrow governments
Sound familiar?
Mike Benz on Joe Rogan: “A scandal during the Obama USAID era. We were running a number of rogue USAID operations in Cuba at the time. — I'm simply showing the American people where your tax dollars are going and how these things are structured in order to systematically fool you and to fool Congress and to fool the White House:
— USAID pumped $1.2 billion in, and we sponsored these activist groups and these civil society organizations to learn how to use Facebook, learn how to use Twitter, lose, learn how to use hashtags, learn how to coordinate street protests so that everyone knows where to go, what street to show up on, what kind of slogans to know, to use in order to create the pro-democracy predicate for it.”
He talks about how Obama funded a Twitter clone that would be used to push propaganda in Cuba to inspire these protests and overthrow the government (Mike Benz explains how Barack Obama overthrew many governments)
“So what they did is they took the exact same thing as Twitter, same user interface, same like, and retweet button zunzunio is, is the Cuban slang word for hummingbird. So just, it means it's it's bird, it was the Twitter bird, the whole thing. But the whole trick about it was you have to make it look like it's coming from the Cubans if you're going to do this operation
— We can get into the deeper layers of this, but contractors were funded by USAID
The data would then be used for micro targeting efforts towards anti and pro government users. In Cuba, the developers aim to, at first used non-controversial content such as sports and music and hurricane updates — What was the plan the whole time? Once they built up enough subscribers, they would begin to introduce political messages through social bots and encourage dissent in this, in this astroturfing — the whole point is, once they hit a critical mass, they would create ‘Rent-a-Riots”
“You're using Cayman Islands bank accounts. You're saying it's, you're earmarking it for Pakistani aid.” But the money was never sent to Pakistan, it was sent to the Cayman Islands to fund this whole operation
All this and much more is broken down extremely well in this video. This is INSANE
David Friedberg: It's not rich vs poor, it's makers vs takers.
@friedberg:
“ The great lie is that there are two sides to society, that is the rich and the poor.
And the great truth is that there are two sides that are the makers and the takers.
The lie is that the rich are unfairly rich and the poor are unfairly poor, and therefore, the poor must take from the rich.
But the truth is that it's the takers that tell you that lie, that the real truth is that artists, plumbers, electricians, woodworkers, computer scientists, people that build, people that make from all walks of life, all income levels, all wealth brackets, are the makers.
And the takers are what Sacks calls this intelligentsia, the analysts, the espousers, the armchair mechanics, the critics, the commentators, the politicians. They are the takers.
They are the people that watch the rest of society make stuff, build stuff, specifically doing things that create value for other people in society. That's what a maker is.”
Bitcoin isn't digital gold. It's not locked in by math. You can kill it.
The man who ran money at Peter Thiel's hedge fund came on to explain who's trying — and why the only thing protecting Bitcoin is the people who run nodes.
@mattkratter — Bitcoin University founder, former Clarium / Thiel-world macro trader, early Palantir investor — joins me to lay out the fight consuming Bitcoin right now in plain English: why he says Bitcoin Core has "gone rogue," the spam war over OP_RETURN and BIP-110 he calls Bitcoin's last stand, why consensus flows from culture and not code, who actually controls the network (hint: not the miners), and how to mine Bitcoin from home for about $10 a day.
Send this to anyone who thinks Bitcoin can't be stopped.
TIMESTAMPS:
00:00 Intro
01:00 Physics dropout to literature — Stanford & Berkeley
05:27 René Girard & meeting Peter Thiel
07:56 Becoming a trader: Thiel Macro → Clarium
12:43 The PayPal mafia, network effects & the dot-com bottom
20:23 Global macro at Clarium & the 2003 housing-blowup call
24:08 Napster, PayPal & the "new world currency"
28:32 Government as the ultimate customer — Palantir & the CIA (In-Q-Tel)
36:00 Deep-state roots — is Peter Thiel captured?
49:32 Culture is upstream of consensus
57:00 Bitcoin isn't magic — nodes, immutability & the spam risk
1:01:42 Why spam is a problem — tragedy of the commons
1:04:30 Spam since Satoshi & the 2014 OP_RETURN war
1:14:30 The changing of the guard at Bitcoin Core
1:18:43 Core uncaps OP_RETURN to 100,000 bytes
1:28:00 Consensus flows from culture — the 2nd Amendment analogy
1:35:20 BIP-110 — the temporary soft fork
1:44:00 Why small blocks — and running nodes in Cuba
2:18:55 SegWit & the 2017 UASF — how 500 nodes won
2:24:00 The miners are just employees — node runners set the rules
2:41:46 "Firing the miners" — changing proof-of-work
2:55:18 Bitcoin Core went rogue — the last stand
2:58:50 You can kill Bitcoin
3:01:20 Mine Bitcoin from home for ~$10/day, KYC-free
3:11:09 Where to find Matt
▶️ https://t.co/8FOZUmSj1b
🚨 CNN Just Broke: California Is Collapsing
Even CNN’s Fareed Zakaria is now admitting it. California is a failing state after decades of one-party Democrat control.
They spend more and more, billions on homelessness alone, yet deliver less and less. Streets in chaos, businesses fleeing, people suffering.
This isn’t an accident.
The same party that created these crises keeps getting rewarded with votes. That’s not loyalty, that’s Stockholm Syndrome. They’ve been lied to, they keep buying the lie, and they defend the very machine destroying their lives.
The propaganda is cracking. The truth is in plain sight.
David Friedberg: California’s Voting System Looks Fraudulent, But It’s Working Exactly as Designed
@friedberg believes California’s extremely loose election laws enable “appointments” not free elections.
Why? The voting data in LA makes no statistical sense.
“ Pratt's post-election mail-in ballots declined by 1/3.
So statistically, the population of people that send in their ballots late reduced for Pratt by 1/3, increased for Nithya Raman by 80%, and Karen Bass 10% less, if you just look at the mail-in ballots before and after election day as a comparison.
I don't know if there's a sociopolitical way that you can assess those statistics and assume that these are individuals casting their individual vote for who they think should be Mayor of LA.
Basically, the concentration of incremental votes that Nithya Raman got came around the Skid Row area in Los Angeles.
But when you look at the basic statistics of what happened in person, mail-in before, mail-in after Election Day, it becomes a real statistical quagmire on how did this sort of a sociopolitical shift happen in such a way that it did?
Now, there was a report published, and they highlighted the 2018 California midterm elections and the challenges that they saw arise in that midterm election because of some of the legislative changes that were made.
First, California Assembly Bill 1921 legalized the practice of unlimited ballot harvesting in the state. What that means is that any individual in the state of California has the right to go and collect ballots from any other individuals, regardless of relationship, fill them out, and send them in.
California, two years later, 18 months later, also passed a law that made it permanent that every person registered in the state of California would get a ballot, so tens of millions of ballots then get mailed out.
Then there was another series of laws that were passed that said anyone can register to vote. You don't need to prove your citizenship. You can use a gym membership card as an example.
So anyone can register to vote. There is no proof of ID when you get a ballot. There is no demonstration that the person who fills out the ballot has anything to do with the individual who's supposed to be voting that ballot, and it is legal for an individual to go out and collect hundreds or thousands of ballots, ship them in, and they will all qualify in these kind of mail-in ballot voting processes.
So there's nothing illegal or fraudulent going on. In fact, the system is operating exactly as intended.
It has been set up and structured in a way that with the right construct, you can get an individual appointed, not elected, but appointed to a particular role in government under a, quote, ‘free election’ in California.”
it's insane to me that this isn't all over mainstream media right now.
for the first time in human history, a drug built to reverse aging was just put into a living person
a company called Life Biosciences dosed the first patient in their trial for something called ER-100
it comes from a Harvard geneticist named David Sinclair
his theory is that aging comes from your cells losing track of how to read their own DNA
think of it like a computer. the hardware is fine, but the software slowly gets corrupted over the years, so the machine runs slower and slower until it stops
the instructions for a young, healthy cell are all still in there. your cells just lost access to them over time
so this drug does one thing: it reboots the cell back to the version of itself that knew how to run properly
they pull it off with three proteins that reset a cell to a younger state
and they proved it works before ever touching a human
first they restored vision in old mice. then they restored vision in monkeys with optic nerve damage, with no tumors and no signs of harm
so now they're testing it on people going blind from glaucoma and a nerve condition called NAION
they started with the eye on purpose. it's the cleanest place to test the idea, because they can inject it into one eye without it reaching the rest of the body, the cells there don't heal on their own so any improvement clearly came from the drug, and they can measure vision right down to the letters on a chart
the reset happens at the level of the cell, so in theory the same approach could one day rejuvenate the liver, the kidneys, even the brain
it won't be automatic though. every organ needs its own way of getting the drug into the right cells, plus its own round of safety testing. so it doesn't suddenly work everywhere the moment it works in the eye
but the eye answers the one question nobody could answer before: whether you can safely turn back the age of living cells inside a person
if the answer is yes, reaching the rest of the body comes down to delivery, one organ at a time. that part is hard, but it's the kind of hard you can engineer your way through
to be clear, this is an early safety trial. 18 people, 5 year follow up.
so nobody is gonna cure aging by next year
but if it works, we'll look back at this week as the moment the clock started running backwards for the first time
Send the video to everyone you know showing how heinously Nowak was treated by the police in his dying moments and how the police cravenly kowtowed to his murderer.
Legacy mainstream media, same ones who wrote about George Floyd millions of times, are dead silent about Nowak.
Wow - Forgot about this clip‼️
Man wearing a Monkey Mask & Santa Hat sat cross-legged in the dirt at a festival, articulates perfectly & with precision - how the World works.
Does anyone have their full length original clip - this is so good.
Dr. Ben Carson urges, "Do NOT allow what was done during COVID to be 'swept under the rug'."
"Dr. Fauci admitted there was no science behind ANY of what he was saying."
"We know the side effects from COVID vaccinations far exceed anything else in the last 30 years combined."