Do not waste your life in roaming outside, pursuing wonders and courting enjoyments; to know the Self through Grace, and to thus abide firmly in the Heart, is alone worthwhile.
~ Ramana Maharshi
Guru Vachaka Kovai
#WATCH | Indore, MP: On the Sejal Pawar and comedian Pranit More controversy, All India Medical Students' Association President, Jitendra Singh says, “First, regarding Sejal Pawar, I must clarify that a donated dead body is referred to as a ‘cadaver.’ A cadaver is a body donated by the family after death for medical study or research. Every medical student takes a ‘cadaver oath’ during their studies. In this oath, the student pledges to treat the body with respect, a sense of duty, and ethical consideration…Sejal Pawar is an MBBS student—that is the information we have. She would certainly have studied the medical oath…Therefore, the remarks she made about the dead body—a body that is revered and god-like—are highly condemnable…As for Pranit More, people like him are a curse on society. In the name of comedy, chasing TRPs, and garnering views, they target our sisters and daughters, our religion, and specific individuals. Our primary demand to the Government of India is to define the parameters of comedy—to establish what kind of comedy is acceptable…”
Ban Posters.. Ban Posters.. Ban Posters.. Ban Posters.. Ban Posters.. Ban Posters.. Ban Posters.. Ban Posters.. Ban Posters.. Ban Posters.. Ban Posters..
Comedian Pranit More and that doctor girl Sejal have released apology videos, claiming they now realize their so called jokes were crass and offensive and are seeking forgiveness.
My point is simple, would they have apologized if those videos had not gone viral and sparked public outrage? The answer is clearly no. If there had been no backlash, the mockery crassness would have continued.
This is not a case of genuine self realization or awakening. It is a reaction driven by fear of consequences, damage to reputation and public condemnation. An apology made under pressure is not sincere.
True remorse comes from conviction, not from being caught and exposed
"Out of 10 rape cases, 9 are just rape. 1 involves murder after rape. I think that one case is when right after the rape, the guy gets up and the girl says, 'Aren't you going to cuddle?' Then the guy stabs her."
— Strict action should be taken against comedian Madhur Virli.
Society so misogynistic, if a girl gets diagnosed with PCOS, their first concern is whether she will be able to conceive rather than worrying about how she is at a higher risk for endometrial c*ncer, T2D and cardiovascular diseases
[18+]
Another day, another hack comedian, another pathetic, crass "joke."
Is this what we’re hiding under the umbrella of "free speech" now? Has the world completely run out of actual topics that you have to rely on sexual crimes for laughs? What’s truly pathetic is hearing women in the audience cackle along, completely blind to their own degradation.
Look, this garbage might still be tolerable if you confine it to a closed room full of audience who know exactly what they’re paying for. But the second you record it and plaster it all over a public forum, it becomes everyone's business. We are all stakeholders in the culture we live in, and the vast majority of us don't support such cheap, lazy filth masquerading as "comedy."
Can we all please wake up and realise that the falling birth rates are actually the CORRECT birth rates. More women are just finally having babies only when they want to, not when they are forced to.
"The baby you aborted could have cured cancer."
So could the women you kept in the kitchen, denied their education, bodily autonomy, and basic human rights.
But you didn't care about them either.
The real friction holding back India’s ability to develop and innovate in hardware isn’t a lack of talent or ideas. It is big government control, excessive regulations, import restrictions, and the bureaucratic red tape that together make even basic high-tech experimentation unnecessarily difficult for small teams and individuals.
Consider a group of talented college students or a small startup team working on computer vision. They develop an idea that requires testing with advanced camera lenses or specialised sensors.
Instead of simply ordering the parts and starting work, they get pulled into a maze of customs documentation, product classification, import duties, and clearance procedures that can take weeks. The same friction appears even with relatively common electronic components or small mechanical parts needed for prototyping.
This burden falls heaviest on agile players such as students, independent experimenters, and small teams, who lack dedicated compliance teams or established importer networks. For them, every extra form and every delay becomes a barrier to learning and building. The result is that many capable people spend more time navigating rules than actually experimenting.
When this friction becomes insurmountable without connections or influence, talented individuals eventually look for environments where they can focus on the work instead of navigating the process.
Many leave the country and move into areas with lower regulatory interference for even basic things. Over time, this weakens the overall pool of people who have hands-on experience with real hardware development.
Even large companies eventually feel the consequences. Small agile teams inside these organisations often cannot experiment independently with new ideas, even when they have discretionary budgets. They end up depending on corporate-level resources and connections to clear bureaucratic hurdles.
At the same time, large companies still rely on a broader ecosystem of skilled engineers and researchers. When that ecosystem lacks people who have actually built and experimented at a smaller scale, the quality of available talent declines across the board.
R&D in large organisations also cannot be driven purely through top-down planning. Engineers and innovators thrive on tinkering and prototyping multiple ideas, some of which eventually lead to breakthroughs.
India does much better in software precisely because anyone can download software, including open-source tools, and experiment freely. This kind of small-scale tinkering culture is extremely important for building a broader innovation and R&D ecosystem. In hardware, however, that spark is often killed before it even begins.
The core problem is big government control and the bureaucratic red tape it inevitably creates. When the state tries to regulate and monitor even small-scale imports and experimentation, it destroys the conditions needed for deep tech and even basic R&D to flourish.
Instead of more centralised control and layers of approvals, India needs an ultra-minimal government and genuinely open and free markets. Only then will talented individuals and small teams be able to experiment freely, iterate quickly and build without constant interference from big government.
The best thing about the recent Niti Aayog meeting was - all 28 CMs were present with zero boycott.
I think all of them, by now, have understood, you boycott, you are out in the next election.
The mind will subside only by means of the inquiry ‘Who am I?’.
The thought ‘Who am I?’, will itself be destroyed in the end, like the stick used for stirring the funeral pyre.
~ Ramana Maharshi
Nan Yar (Who am I)
Aditya Dhar: "I don't think the current government needs a small film like this to win an election. They gave us all the Ram Mandir it took 500 years."
This was said during article 370 promotions and it applies to Dhurandhar as well 😂❤️.
It was a few years back during the first year of my graduation. Back then, I held highly secular views. Around that time, I received a follow request on social media from a guy named Junaid, which I accepted.
Gradually, our conversations turned into a friendship. Junaid used to project himself as highly secular, feminist, and open-minded (progressive). He would constantly try to prove that he was modern and entirely different from extremists.
During our chats, he subtly started praising Islam. He would often send me reels and videos of Islamic scholars (Maulanas) who spoke in a very "sugar-coated" and sweet manner. Watching those videos repeatedly sparked my curiosity, and soon, my YouTube feed was flooded with Islamic content. I began to wonder—is this religion genuinely that beautiful and modern?
Then, one day, a video by an "Ex-Muslim" popped up on my social media feed. The video discussed the historical facts surrounding the age of Aisha at the time of her marriage to Prophet Muhammad. I was absolutely shocked.
Driven by curiosity, I searched deeper and watched more videos on that channel. That is how I came to know about regressive practices like "Halala". I was left wondering how any religion could preach things that go so starkly against women's rights and dignity.
When I confronted Junaid about this, he started beating around the bush. He had no logical explanations, and I was completely unsatisfied with his evasive answers. Finally, I asked him a direct and personal question: "If you were in that era, would you have married off your daughter at such a tender age? And in case of a divorce, would you make your wife go through 'Halala'?"
His response left me utterly stunned. The guy who used to boast about being a liberal and a critical thinker said without a shred of hesitation: "Islam can never be wrong. I would do exactly what the Quran commands."
His blind faith was out in the open. I told him, "My friend, you claim to be so liberal and open-minded, yet your mindset is so narrow!"
At this, he lost his temper completely. When he ran out of logical arguments, he resorted to frustration and did exactly what such people usually do—he started labeling me. He said, "You are a Sanghi, you will never understand this!"
After that, I showed him his true place, gave him a piece of my mind, and immediately BLOCKED him everywhere.
The reason behind sharing this story is to highlight how some Muslim men fake being highly progressive, feminist, and liberal just to befriend Hindu girls, win their trust, and then gradually trap them in a well-planned ideological snare.
> 5 pregnant women admitted to govt hospital, Kota
> Were advised cesarean deliveries
> Fake injections given to stop bleeding
> Injections only contained water
> All Five mothers died
This country used to be called the “Golden Bird,” and today it has been turned into a joke.
BHAGAVAN ON HIMSELF (PERUMAL CASE)
" I have not given sannyas (the status of renunciate) to anyone, nor have I taken sannyas from anyone. I was living in Skandashram. My mother, who was also living there, passed away in 1922. Her corpse was brought to the foot of the hill and buried here, and a samadhi (shrine) was built over it. From that time, puja was started here. After a while, I left Skandashram and came and stayed here. At no time have I taken any title. At no time have I initiated any disciples with diksha (formal initiation) or in any ritualistic way. I do not impose any restrictions or discipline on those who gather around me. I do not invite anyone to come to this place, nor do I tell anyone to leave this place. By birth, I am a Brahmin.
I was a Brahmachari (celibate student) when I came here (i.e. to Tiruvannamalai). Within an hour of arriving, I threw away my sacred thread, clothes, etc.; I shaved my head clean. I had about three rupees and threw it away, and since then, I do not touch money. I accept in my hands things that can be eaten. I do not give upadesa (spiritual instruction) or call myself a guru. However, if questions are asked by seekers I answer them. Since 1907, people have called me ' Ramana Rishi'.
I am an 'athyashrami' (beyond the ashrams and castes) not falling within the category of any of the ashrams. This state is recognized in the sastras. It is explained in the Suta Samhita. The athyashrami can own property if necessary. He needs a guru,
but the Self is my guru. The Athyashrami is not bound to observe any rites. I have no desire to acquire properties, but things come, and I accept them. I agree that to own property is worldly, but I do not hate the world.”
Bhagavan was questioned by a lawyer because Perumal Swami had accused him on absurd grounds.