@farrm51 Being PM isn't a solo act—it’s about having a strong, capable team that shares the values of the people. With the country in crisis after years of labor and liberal, we need a fresh direction that actually reflects what most Australians are asking for. Go Pauline
@testikalz@bradpsychology Only a moron would assume that past votes equal current satisfaction. You’re citing a historical snapshot while the country is currently living in a completely different reality. It’s not that complicated; try to look at what’s actually happening on the ground.
@BenFordhamLive I literally cannot get ahead, each year I fall further behind and each year I do my tax I get more bills despite already paying over $1000 a week in PAYG……
I am contemplating quitting my high paying, stressful job and becoming a travelling gypsy …
Today the Labor Government will be ramming through the Senate their National Health Amendment (Passive Immunological Products) Bill without debate.
The Bill will change and expand the definition of vaccine to include any “immunising agent, that confers protection to persons through active or passive immunity against disease”.
What that will likely mean is more products being paid for by the tax payer and presumably added to the childhood schedule in due course.
I will NOT BE SUPPORTING the Bill.
'Vaccine' set to be redefined in Australia via fast-tracked bill
One of the 22 bills being rushed via guillotine motion through the Australian Senate this week is the National Health Amendment (Passive Immunological Products) Bill 2026.
The bill proposes to amend the legal definition of “vaccine” so that new and emerging technologies can be listed on the National Immunisation Program.
In his explanatory memorandum, Mark Butler notes that "the current definition of ‘vaccine’ in the Act supports the technical meaning of ‘vaccine’ being a substance administered to elicit an immune response – that is a mode of active immunisation. Immunisation products that do not elicit an immune response and provide protection through passive immunological means are unable to be listed on the NIP."
"The Bill will broaden the definition of ‘vaccine’ in the Act to enable new and emerging technologies to be listed on the NIP. This amendment will expand access to these necessary products, ensuring the NIP is flexible and fit-for-purpose in a rapidly evolving healthcare environment."
It seems that our government has learnt nothing from the mRNA vaccine disaster during COVID.
The mRNA jabs do give an immune response - an autoimmune response that attacks the organs of the receiptant that causes serious harm.
These lunatics have to be stopped. Sign up to https://t.co/PeAaJW2pjF - we are the only party that can explain the biochemistry of mRNA vaccines to an unsuspecting public.
Thanks to Michael Arbon for letting me know of this bill and his comments above.
@TateTheTalisman You have 2 positions? Good. I have the output of 2 people +
From skippering commercial vessels, to building/selling companies & securing Tier 1 mine approvals—I execute. I’m a no-BS Mum who stays fit, stays sharp, and gives it to you straight.
If I put my mind to it, it’s done.
@TruthFairy131 Instead of hiring more bureaucrats to churn out new laws, these clowns should focus on gutting the nonsensical ones already costing taxpayers billions!
@QBCCIntegrity Oh well looks like all the property investors are putting rents up to cover their losses and holding on to their investments until the next government comes in and changes it back 🙄
@mattjcan You're losing ground by attacking Pauline. The Nats and Libs have already lost their base to One Nation; if you want respect back, align with conservative values instead of sounding like a left leaning fence sitter that bitches about pollies on the right 🤦♀️