People just need to accept the obvious fact that a man believing he’s a woman is always, without exception, weird, unstable, dangerous and indicates deeper perversions. It’s never innocent, it’s never about authenticity, it’s never understandable. It means something is deeply wrong and will always lead to other deeply wrong things. It is not nuanced.
🚨 This is EXACTLY WHY ICE agents are FORCED to wear masks
ICE Newark rioter: “I HAVE YOUR FACE, MOTHERF***ER”
“Your WHOLE F***ING FAMILY is DEAD!”
“Your KIDS. Your WIFE. ALL DEAD!”
This is the type of TERRORISM Democrats WANT ICE agents to face by de-masking them
This analysis is spot on.
"...with virtually no financial support this time, and unwilling to appear for GOP debates, Bailey will carry the Republican banner straight to the garbage heap in November if he prevails in the GOP primary...If Republican primary voters hand Bailey the nomination again, they will not simply be making a mistake. They will be making the same mistake — with full knowledge of the consequences — and handing J.B. Pritzker another four years before the ballots are even printed."
+++
Adding to the @ChicagoContrar1 review, the password is "suburbs" and here are the key data points:
Pritzker beat Bailey by 33 points in suburban Cook and decisively in every collar county, including three– DuPage, Kane, and McHenry– where Pritzker had lost to Rauner in 2018.
In 2022, Bailey received about 120,000 fewer Chicago metro votes than Rauner in his 2018 loss. That was after Rauner had repelled his base and all but gave up his re-election bid en route to being blown out.
It was decidedly a messenger problem. Messages on the SAFE-T Act, taxes, school choice resonated. For example, Pritzker reversed course during the campaign and expressed an openness to amending the SAFE-T Act (which he subsequently did post-election, admittedly of the perfume-on-a-pig variety) because it was hurting him. Pritzker also hedged on tax credit scholarships during the campaign and dumped any motion he would again seek to graduate the state income tax. But Bailey couldn't carry those issues or any other. He was a tone-deaf gaffe-machine and unwilling to learn. A bad combo.
This time around, he has none of the attributes he had last time (donor and grassroots support) but retains all of the deficiencies that are directly attributable to him.
He is solely living off residual awareness from four years ago. His supporters come from two camps: (1) those who lack the intellectual curiosity to investigate the race, and (2) those who are baffled by the plot twists in Jim Varney movies.
In sum, to renominate Bailey is to concede not only defeat but partisan dignity.
https://t.co/N8kkQ0VxCZ
.@GovPritzker just proposed the most expensive budget in Illinois history: A record-breaking $56 bilion.
And, as usual, there is a catch.
It relies on nearly $600 million in new tax and fee hikes, plus extremely risky gimmicks, including overly optimistic revenue projections and fund transfers.
Here is what's in the fine print of Pritzker's FY2027 budget proposal:
🚩$200M in new "social media fees"
🚩$139M in fund "sweeps" (which put backdoor pressure on your local property taxes)
🚩$269M in corporate tax hikes
🚩$120M in casino tax hikes
Illinoisans already pay the highest state and local tax burden in the U.S. Relying on $1 billion in "updated revenue assumptions" to balance the books is a massive gamble.
When rosy revenue projections fall short, who usually ends up footing the bill? The taxpayers.
We've seen this movie before.
https://t.co/aZP5ooKzXY
ICYMI—I went live with @TedForIllinois for a direct conversation about the issues impacting Illinois.
Thank you Mr. Dabrowski for coming on.
Flip Illinois Red—November 3rd, 2026. 🇺🇸
When you see videos of anti-ICE agitators swarming our officers and agents in Minneapolis, MN, just know… this is who they’re trying to protect.
Below are some of the WORST of the worst we’ve arrested and taken out of MN neighborhoods to protect American families:
I am horrified. I cannot believe it.
I analyzed public databases and media reporting on violent confrontations with ICE over the past year.
Just 9 counties accounted for TWO-THIRDS of violent confrontations with ICE in America.
This is twice all violent confrontations in the remaining 3,134 counties COMBINED.
A violent confrontation in these 9 counties was 590 TIMES more likely than any of these other 3,134 counties.
590 times.
I plotted these 9 counties, and I found that all 9 counties are sanctuary jurisdictions run by Democrat politicians that resist immigration law enforcement.
These violent confrontations are RARE in states and cities where local officials cooperate with law enforcement.
A short discourse on the word "equity," which means getting one's fair share in return for one's investment, and its perversions under Woke doctrine, which comes from Soviet Union Communism.
Bonus material: Why ending "disparate impact" (inequity) doctrines in law ruins Woke.
🧵THREAD🧵
The legacy media didn’t miss the Minnesota Somalian fraud story.
They actively dismissed it as made up, racist, or xenophobic.
Before the stories are quietly edited, I’ve got screenshots. ⤵️
@Libs_OfChicago@ChicagosMayor He's a huckster bullshitting his way through a job he's completely unqualified for.
He's the George Costanza of mayors and we're praying he stumbles upon the insight to start doing the opposite.
BREAKING - The man at the No Kings rally in Chicago who urged people to grab guns and shoot ICE agents has been identified as Moises Bernal, an employee of Wilbur Wright College in Chicago.
Ask the school if this man represents them.
Moises is about to have a very bad day.
Yeah. Charlie Kirk did say, "I think it's worth to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year so that we can have the Second Amendment to protect our other God-given rights."
Here's the full quote:
“Yeah, it's a great question. Thank you. So, I'm a big Second Amendment fan but I think most politicians are cowards when it comes to defending why we have a Second Amendment. This is why I would not be a good politician, or maybe I would, I don't know, because I actually speak my mind.
The Second Amendment is not about hunting. I love hunting. The Second Amendment is not even about personal defense. That is important. The Second Amendment is there, God forbid, so that you can defend yourself against a tyrannical government. And if that talk scares you — "wow, that's radical, Charlie, I don't know about that" — well then, you have not really read any of the literature of our Founding Fathers. Number two, you've not read any 20th-century history. You're just living in Narnia. By the way, if you're actually living in Narnia, you would be wiser than wherever you're living, because C.S. Lewis was really smart. So I don't know what alternative universe you're living in. You just don't want to face reality that governments tend to get tyrannical and that if people need an ability to protect themselves and their communities and their families.
Now, we must also be real. We must be honest with the population. Having an armed citizenry comes with a price, and that is part of liberty. Driving comes with a price. 50,000, 50,000, 50,000 people die on the road every year. That's a price. You get rid of driving, you'd have 50,000 less auto fatalities. But we have decided that the benefit of driving — speed, accessibility, mobility, having products, services — is worth the cost of 50,000 people dying on the road. So we need to be very clear that you're not going to get gun deaths to zero. It will not happen. You could significantly reduce them through having more fathers in the home, by having more armed guards in front of schools. We should have a honest and clear reductionist view of gun violence, but we should not have a utopian one.
You will never live in a society when you have an armed citizenry and you won't have a single gun death. That is nonsense. It's drivel. But I am, I, I — I think it's worth it. I think it's worth to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year so that we can have the Second Amendment to protect our other God-given rights. That is a prudent deal. It is rational. Nobody talks like this. They live in a complete alternate universe.
So then, how do you reduce? Very simple. People say, oh, Charlie, how do you stop school shootings? I don't know. How did we stop shootings at baseball games? Because we have armed guards outside of baseball games. That's why. How did we stop all the shootings at airports? We have armed guards outside of airports. How do we stop all the shootings at banks? We have armed guards outside of banks. How did we stop all the shootings at gun shows? Notice there's not a lot of mass shootings at gun shows, there's all these guns. Because everyone's armed. If our money and our sporting events and our airplanes have armed guards, why don't our children?”
Nearly 32,000 public sector retirees in Illinois took home more than $100,000 in pension benefits last year.
Seven cracked $500,000.
https://t.co/ppOOevvqxK