Vedic Path

स पर्यगाच्छुक्रमकायमव्रणमस्नाविरँ शुद्धमपापविद्धम् ।
-Ishwar is pure without body of veins.
{Yajur-Veda 40/8}

[Vedic Path @vedicpath1]

@IsimsizleRd9kx @Truth_z7 @Sarcaztick "archive links are scammers link"😂
Typical chuslim argument for running away from sahih al-bukhari 5133.

Repeating same arguments which has already been clarified in the link is not going to work.
It only shows that you don't have balls to debate on Sahih al-bukhari 5133.

[Vedic Path @vedicpath1]

@IsimsizleRd9kx @Truth_z7 @Sarcaztick This has already been clarified in this link-
https://t.co/4Dkz8wMOYE

Now answer on Sahih al bukhari 5133

[Vedic Path @vedicpath1]

@Shiiieeeeeet @Truth_z7 @ygcaarse I don't like to talk on same reference which has already been clarified.
Sane people will read that link and decide what my books say about the age of marriage.

Now say that your best role model was a ped0file.
Say it.

[Vedic Path @vedicpath1]

@Shiiieeeeeet @Truth_z7 @ygcaarse Bringing same reference which has already been clarified in the above link is not going to prove your point.

So if you don't have any issue with that hadith then say that "you are a supporter of Ped0filia".

Come on say it.

[Vedic Path @vedicpath1]

@Shiiieeeeeet @Truth_z7 @ygcaarse This has already been refuted in this link-
https://t.co/4Dkz8wMOYE

Now answer on this.

[Vedic Path @vedicpath1]

@waky7 @Truth_z7 @sneako Pedofilia was not normal even during the time of your messenger.

Your messenger rejected the proposal of Umar & Abu bakr who were in their 40s & 50s for his daughter who was in her 20s because of their AGE.

[Vedic Path @vedicpath1]

@threadreaderapp unroll

[Vedic Path @vedicpath1]

Allegation of Child marriage & Pedofilia in Sanatan Vedic dharma is refuted.

[Vedic Path @vedicpath1]

At the end
"Any verse against Vedas is useless"
~Manu 12/95

[Vedic Path @vedicpath1]

@waky7 @Truth_z7 @sneako Individual actions and actions which are based on religious teachings are two different things.

He has put allegations on Islam not what muslims personally do.

[Vedic Path @vedicpath1]

@parody857601 @Truth_z7 @sneako Such allegations has already been refuted in this link-
https://t.co/JpMtaKJwM3

Now when will you talk sahih al bukhari 5133?
Or you are just ashamed to talk on it that's why you are just jumping from one topic to another to avoid discussion on that like a typical chuslim😂

[Vedic Path @vedicpath1]

@parody857601 @Truth_z7 @sneako This has already been clarified in this link-
https://t.co/JpMtaKJwM3

Now when will you talk sahih al bukhari 5133?
Or you are just ashamed to talk on it that's why you are just jumping from one topic to another to avoid discussion on that like a typical chuslim😂

[Vedic Path @vedicpath1]

@threadreaderapp unroll

[Vedic Path @vedicpath1]

At the end
"Any verse against vedas is useless"
-Manu 12/95

[Vedic Path @vedicpath1]

As per Vedas Ishwar is a formless entity.

"There is no image of him, the aja (unborn)"
-Yajur-Veda 32/3

That's why we don't consider such pauranik stories as historical fact.

[Vedic Path @vedicpath1]

Many mlecchas object on pauranik story of shiva and mohini and try to prove adultery and forceful relationship in Sanatan dharma.

Let's debunk this.

[Vedic Path @vedicpath1]

Forceful relationship is also against Vedas.

[Vedic Path @vedicpath1]

Adultery is against vedas

"Whatever wrong we do by betray, Ishwar keep them away from us"
(ATHARVA VEDA 6/45/2)

That's why it is a punishable offence in manu 8/352

[Vedic Path @vedicpath1]

@parody857601 @Truth_z7 @sneako All references are wrong.

Give reference from original source
like this😂

[Vedic Path @vedicpath1]

@parody857601 @Truth_z7 @sneako It's over chuslim. I am not here to explain about idoms on speech.

Repeating same thing is not going to work.
Are you ashamed to talk on your own book.