This is the best interview I have EVER seen.
Ever; ever; ever; nothing comes close.
Douglas Murrey has a heart – and mind – of gold.
And what unfolds in this seven-minute clip is something you need to watch for yourself. (Once you see it halfway through, you’ll know exactly what I’m referring to.)
But he articulates something which I have been trying to share for the past month:
The Nazis, as fundamentally evil as they were, believed that they were engaging in a necessary evil for an ultimate good; they still had a spark of humanity at their core; thus, their main flaw was that they believed the ends justified the means; even though they fully believed in the “result” of a world without Jews, they were still fundamentally opposed to the “actions” they were taking.
This is what motivated the Nazis to find ways of circumventing the existential moral decay they were entering, and allowed them to get creative by using the gas chambers, mass shootings (in the BACK of the head – to avoid direct facial contact), and other passive forms of mass annihilation, while also having as few Nazis as possible actually involved in these acts of murder; they then encouraged those individuals who were involved in this atrocity of mass murder to get drunk every night in order to wash away the person they started seeing in the mirror.
Thus, the existential decay of these individual Nazis actively involved in the mass murder of the Jewish People was simply seen as another layer of “the ends justify the means.”
They were the epitome of “Western” evil.
Hamas is the exact opposite.
This IS their value system.
They prize death, murder, rape, suicide missions, and everything that opposes the very foundation of values and truth to begin with.
The events of October 7th was not an end to a means… there is no future goal… this IS the goal.
They are the epitome of an evil the likes of which we have never before seen.
Please – I know this is social media and some people only watch 60-second soundbites; but please, please, please watch this brilliant interview.
Douglas Murray – you are a credit to everything worth being credited.
Hello Senator Thune,
At 3 AM on Friday, March 27th, in a near-empty chamber, you passed a bill by voice vote that excludes all funding for ICE and CBP.
Let me repeat that: voice vote. No roll call. No record of who was there. No accountability. Just you, Barrasso, and a handful of senators shuffling paper in the dead of night while America slept.
You could have demanded a recorded vote. You chose not to.
You could have held the line for five more days until the House returned. You chose not to.
You could have used the same procedural tools Democrats have used against you for 40 days. You chose not to.
Instead, you gave Chuck Schumer exactly what he asked for, DHS funding minus immigration enforcement, and called it a win. Then you walked to the cameras and blamed the Democrats.
Let's be precise about what you did:
1. You caved to a demand Democrats made on Day 1 of this shutdown. Forty-one days of supposed hardball negotiation, and you settled for their opening offer.
2. You handed them a template. The next time Democrats want to defund any agency — ICE, CBP, or anything else — they now know: just shut down DHS and wait. John Thune will fold at 3 AM.
3. You punted to reconciliation. "Good possibility," you said. Not "we will." Not "guaranteed." Just maybe. Meanwhile, ICE operates on fumes from last year's bill with no certainty of future funding.
The precedent you set:
You have argued for months that the filibuster is sacrosanct. That the 60-vote threshold protects minority rights. That we cannot bend Senate rules for policy wins.
But at 3 AM on Friday, you bent every norm that actually mattered:
• Voice vote to avoid accountability
• Empty chamber to avoid debate
• Midnight deal to avoid scrutiny
• Immediate recess to avoid questions
You'll bend the rules to avoid a fight. You just won't bend them to win one.
What you've actually accomplished:
Democrats demanded ICE restrictions. They got ICE defunded.
Not reformed. Not restrained. Defunded.
And you're out here tweeting about how Democrats are the "Defund the Police" party while you just voted to defund border enforcement at 3 in the morning.
The question you should answer:
Why did this deal have to happen at 3 AM?
Why couldn't it happen at 3 PM, with cameras rolling and every senator on record?
You know why. Because you didn't want your voters to see what surrender looks like.
Here's my message: We saw it anyway.
Stop hiding behind "Democrat obstruction." You're the Majority Leader. You set the schedule. You control the floor. You chose this outcome.
Own it.
Hello Senator Curtis ( @SenJohnCurtis ),
Many people on social media know me as DataRepublican. They do not know my origin.
That story is inseparable from @realJeremyCarl.
For five years, my account existed in obscurity. I posted maps, vote models, turnout analyses. Jeremy was there from the beginning. Not because I was influential. I was not. He followed because he understood the math.
In 2020, when conventional wisdom insisted Florida would decide the election for President Biden, I built a real-time early vote model showing something different. The data was clear to anyone willing to engage it seriously. Many dismissed it. Jeremy did not. He grasped it immediately.
In 2024, he found me again as I returned to early vote analysis, this time mapping Pennsylvania down to the city-block level. He reached out to me because he was intensely interested in who would do such a thing. When I told him who I was, a Deaf Aspie woman who had burned out in Big Tech and found solace in data modeling for its own sake, he did not react with sentimentality. He reacted with curiosity and care.
He asked questions. He wanted to understand what Deafness meant beyond a label. He wanted to understand Asperger's beyond stereotypes. He wanted to understand what it was like to navigate Big Tech as a woman, and what burnout actually feels like. He did not reduce me to categories. He listened.
And then he did something I never expected.
He introduced me to Charlie Kirk and advocated for me... not as a diversity story, but as someone whose work deserved to be taken seriously. Charlie ultimately invited a Deaf woman with no platform to participate on Election Night. That moment did not happen by accident. It happened because Jeremy saw a person where others saw a profile.
I say this plainly: no one has ever made my identity feel more understood or more respected than Jeremy Carl.
He is frequently caricatured. It is harder to look closely. Jeremy seeks understanding, even when conversations are uncomfortable. He asks questions others avoid. He does not frame people as abstractions. He treats them as human beings.
Senator, I have disagreed publicly with many people. I have not come after you, despite your political evolution and associations some in my circles question, because I believe people should be judged on who they are now. I believe in growth. I believe in second chances. And so far, you have not disappointed.
I ask that you extend the same generosity of judgment here.
Please do not take the easy path of voting against Jeremy Carl based on caricature. Judge him as I have known him: thoughtful, serious, deeply human, and incapable of the cruelty he is accused of.
Respectfully,
Jennica AKA DataRepublican
No.
That is exactly what he is NOT.
I have had people say stupid things like ... "did you hear..." or "that sounds like ..." and then fall over themselves apologizing for using a metaphor, because they equated linguistic bluntness with discrimination.
Let me tell you something, as someone who has actual lived experience with every form of actual bigotry.
Language is weaponized **precisely because** it keeps humans focused on trivial problems and never on actually solving hard problems.
Know why?
Because to anyone with actual problems ... language is the last thing on their minds. I worry about lack of captions. I worry about the police shooting me for ignoring orders. I worry about my kids being made fun of because their mother is deaf.
In short, I have real problems, and none of them involve un-PC wording.
Jeremy always sought to understood where the actual problem space was. Which -- let's admit it -- in today's culture, is impossible without discussing what it means to be white in a deeply racially political society.
Jeremy is not a supremacist of any kind just because he said "White" in a context that wasn't conforming to modern woke principles.
Here’s why Minnesota patriots aren’t counter-protesting, since people keep asking:
1.We’ve already seen how this plays out. The “summer of love” wasn’t that long ago. We know exactly what happens, how it ends, and who gets blamed. None of this is surprising.
2.A lot of the people showing up aren’t even from here. And yes, some of them are dangerous. Watch the footage from the last couple weeks if you don’t believe it. This isn’t organic, and it’s not peaceful. I’m not risking my life for theatrics, nor should you. These people are not worth dying for.
https://t.co/pt3UGRJUT1 enforcement here is not going to protect you if things go bad. Especially if you’re conservative. Especially if you’re white. That’s just reality in MN right now, whether people like hearing it or not.
4.Counter-protesting does absolutely nothing. It doesn’t change minds. It doesn’t stop anything. It just gives them what they want, confrontation, chaos, and headlines. You don’t give narcissists attention they’re craving.
5.Letting the left expose itself is intentional. The more they talk, the more people wake up. You don’t interrupt your opponent when they’re making their own case.
6.We have families, jobs, homes, and real lives. I’m not throwing that away to scream at people who aren’t listening anyway.
7.Restraint is not weakness. Silence is not surrender. Discipline is not fear.
We’re watching. We’re aware. And we’re not playing their game.
As a former Special Forces Warrant Officer with multiple rotations running counterinsurgency ops—both hunting insurgents and trying to separate them from sympathetic populations—I’ve seen organized resistance up close. From Anbar to Helmand, the pattern is familiar: spotters, cutouts, dead drops (or modern equivalents), disciplined comms, role specialization, and a willingness to absorb casualties while bleeding the stronger force slowly.
What’s unfolding in Minneapolis right now isn’t “protest.” It’s low-level insurgency infrastructure, built by people who’ve clearly studied the playbook.
Signal groups at 1,000-member cap per zone. Dedicated roles: mobile chasers, plate checkers logging vehicle data into shared databases, 24/7 dispatch nodes vectoring assets, SALUTE-style reporting (Size, Activity, Location, Unit, Time, Equipment) on suspected federal vehicles. Daily chat rotations and timed deletions to frustrate forensic recovery. Vetting processes for new joiners. Mutual aid from sympathetic locals (teachers providing cover, possible PD tip-offs on license plate lookups). Home-base coordination points. Rapid escalation from observation to physical obstruction—or worse.
This isn’t spontaneous outrage. This is C2 (command and control) with redundancy, OPSEC hygiene, and task organization that would make a SF team sergeant nod in recognition. Replace “ICE agents” with “occupying coalition forces” and the structure maps almost 1:1 to early-stage urban cells we hunted in the mid-2000s.
The most sobering part? It’s domestic. Funded, trained (somewhere), and directed by people who live in the same country they’re trying to paralyze law enforcement in. When your own citizens build and operate this level of parallel intelligence and rapid-response network against federal officers—complete with doxxing, vehicle pursuits, and harassment that’s already turned lethal—you’re no longer dealing with civil disobedience. You’re facing a distributed resistance that’s learned the lessons of successful insurgencies: stay below the kinetic threshold most of the time, force over-reaction when possible, maintain popular support through narrative, and never present a single center of gravity.
I spent years training partner forces to dismantle exactly this kind of apparatus. Now pieces of it are standing up in American cities, enabled by elements of local government and civil society. That should keep every thinking American awake at night.
Not because I want escalation. But because history shows these things don’t de-escalate on their own once the infrastructure exists and the cadre believe they’re winning the information war.
We either recognize what we’re actually looking at—or we pretend it’s still just “activism” until the structures harden and spread.
Your call, America. But from where I sit, this isn’t January 2026 politics anymore.
It’s phase one of something we’ve spent decades trying to keep off our own soil.
It's sad when a federal agent has to ask in the front of a destroyed hotel entrance, "Where is the local PD?". This is the question the entire nation should be asking.
This man nails it
“If you want to know if you're a real activist or a fake activist, just do this little test right here and ask yourself this:
If ICE was deporting MAGA people, would you be protesting in the streets or celebrating in the streets? Would you be saying they're targeting US citizens who pay their taxes and not breaking any laws? Or would you be saying bye?
If MAGA people were stalking, harassing, intimidating and assaulting federal law enforcement, would you still be calling them protesters? Or would you be calling them agitators, provocateurs, criminals and terrorists?
If you think a 115-pound unarmed woman jumping through a window deserved to be shot, but not a woman driving a 2,000-pound weapon into an officer, congratulations. You're a fake activist.”
It’s interesting that you never asked “ How many Americans need to be shot or raped by illegals before you feel remorse and want them deported?
Ten?
A hundred?
A thousand?”
Because over the past ten years, illegals have been found guilty of 708 homicides and 4,531 sexual assaults.
The likely number of Americans being raped by illegals is between 15,000 and 30,000.
This is very concerning,
"We only have 4 million adults in the state of Wisconsin." But 7.13 million are on the voter rolls. "That grows almost daily. It never ends."
2017: Riots
2018: Riots
2019: Riots
2020: Riots
2021: No Riots
2022: No Riots
2023: No Riots
2024: No Riots
2025: Riots
2026: Riots
Make sense yet?
I’m just here pointing out the obvious.
Immigration agents have only shot at 4 people in 2026 despite carrying out thousands of operations nationwide:
- One was armed with a handgun
- One was armed with a shovel
- Two weaponized their vehicles
Not a single person has been shot for holding a sign and protesting.