According to unverified, unsubstantiated civil pleadings. Also, Mr. Pope never concealed his identity. That is a verifiable fact, one apparently beyond your ability to distinguish from unsupported allegations. Your ignorance is beyond measure.
Mr. Tate is unlikely to face extradition for years. During that time, he has no legitimate need for the accusers' identities. If clearing his name were the objective, voluntarily surrendering to UK authorities would be the fastest path to full disclosure and due process.
The intellectual cripple is so clueless they don't even know which side issued the subpoenas. They confidently attributed a defense subpoena to the plaintiffs. It takes a remarkable level of incompetence to be this confidently wrong.
With God as my witness, I have never encountered someone so detached from reality. A pleading is not evidence. More importantly, the alleged doxxing is precisely what resulted in the protective court order requiring her to be identified as Jane Doe.
This individual needs help.
Your entire account consists of fabricated narratives and defamatory statements, all born from a complete lack of intelligence and understanding of the very subject you pretend to explain.
Virtually every word you manage to type requires correction.
A person does not lose, or "loose," discovery. There have been no rulings on the merits in any capacity.
Every post this ignorant monkey makes stands as a monument to their complete ignorance of the very subject they insist on lecturing everyone else about.
Reading is not something this nincompoop is capable of doing. The very page they shared says something completely different from what they claim, while also contradicting their own previous post.
It was never stated the woman “bought properties.”
I stepped away to attend to personal matters, only to return to find a full scale crash out featuring even more factual errors, misinformation, and self inflicted embarrassment than before.
The two legal systems are not comparable. It’s an entirely different process.
✨⭐️ In Other News, you're a gullible stooge.
The Strengthening Proactive Criminal Justice Response initiative was agreed upon in 2019. So no, the timeline does not coincide with the year Jane and Mary Doe visited Romania.
I have it on good authority that an individual has been identified and located. More notably, not one, but two separate lawsuits are currently being prepared.
This bumbling buffoon has latched onto a pre-indictment comment where a judge requested additional evidence. That evidence was provided. The defendant was then charged.
Your argument expired at the next hearing. You are severely out of date.
One of the more fascinating forms of legal illiteracy is watching people apply US legal concepts to Romanian law.
News flash: Romania is not a US courtroom. Different laws, different procedures, different standards, different legal traditions. No, you cannot say that.
1.
@JayPad81 I do not know whether anyone was raped. Neither do you. I can't speak to Romania, but Mr. Tate has been formally charged in the UK with rape offenses and also faces a separate civil claim arising from similar allegations.
It's genuinely impressive to be wrong about every single aspect of every single topic.
They are not currently indicted in the United Kingdom. Any UK proceedings requiring their appearance occur when they are surrendered to UK jurisdiction.
@JayPad81@Gemtoos Mr. Tate was placed in preventive detention, a temporary measure intended to mitigate flight risk and prevent interference with the investigation. It was never a permanent arrangement.