@KaliSurfWave I doubt I would be right-wing without growing up on rock. It gave me a permanent attitude of "fuck the establishment."
When you learn what the real establishment is, the only "rock-n-roll" thing to do is be right-wing.
Throughout this whole thing you still haven't come to terms with the reason for the backlash.
It never had anything to do with condoning any of the males' behavior; it was about the women rallying around Jane Doe to defend her actions while condemning the men.
We tried to condemn all, but you couldn't handle it. You still want to live in a world where men and women can engage in retarded, degenerate behavior and we only blame men, pretending like every woman is "just a girl."
Meanwhile, as you were crashing out, pictures of Jane Doe surface and she's built like a brick shit-house. It's hard to believe she was a scared fawn.
Apply every metric you've used to call her vulnerable to the men, and it sounds the same.
You want to call it rape, then she's guilty, too.
By the way, don't play innocent like you were trying to just have a civilized debate. All you've done is cry out "misogyny" to anyone who disagrees.
Just like Jane Doe, you're guilty of what you're accusing others of.
That's gonna be a hard one for White Americans to hear. The time to turn things around demographically was decades ago. It's mathematically impossible now.
Unfortunately, the Europeans aren't in a much better place. The numbers to actually fight back are too low.
The only way to give Europe the numbers for the fight are to take the racially conscious Whites from America, Canada, and Australia and bring them back to Europe.
Of course, neither they nor the Europeans will accept that. Both will get angry even at the suggestion. Watch me get shit on from both sides of the pond just for saying this.
Technically, yes.
It seems strange when your culture embraces freedom for all religions that it can somehow discriminate against one.
But, if a core tenet of one religion is that it is the only religion and all others must be subjugated, then allowing freedom for all denies that claim, which makes "freedom for all" discriminatory.
The paradox is this: you can't allow full religious freedom. If you do, you deny the core teachings of many of them.
@pearlythingz I have no data to back it up (and I won't pollute my search history with it), but I have a feeling they develop strong attachment to rapists due to their brains flooding them with oxytocin during the act as a defense mechanism for trauma.
Of course, that's the bonding agent...
@KimIversenShow Mostly women.
And after all this time, you still haven't accepted how dark women's sexuality is.
That's why I told you no more kiddie gloves for women. It's time to have an honest conversation about how fucked up the modern woman's mind is.
They do this in all civilized countries. Few people know how to differentiate between living in a country, following the rules and customs, and understanding they are not native.
I never once thought of myself as Japanese when I lived there, despite adapting to the culture. Even if I had stayed, I wouldn't have ever been Japanese.
Good luck convincing others of this. Most refuse to get it.
@GeorgiaMaeCole1 There should be at least one more: your male escort.
All it takes is one of these to be having a bad day or psychotic break, and who do you think they'll go after?
@itispsychomath It's a matter of genetic perception. Most people don't want to admit this kind of thing because it kind of resonates with Relativism, which was used to justify retarded Leftist nonsense.
It betrays suicidal empathy, which a lot of White people refuse to let go of.
Hold on, now. You're being needlessly uncharitable to me in your accusation. I understand incrementalism in governmental projects.
I know perfectly well that ending H-1B outright is impossible right now. I do not fall into the trap of "letting a presently unattainable perfection be the enemy of meaningful progress." I am very familiar with this argument. That's not my position.
You dismissed the fundamental disagreement between us as simply me pretending something. You have more trust in him than I do. That's the disagreement. Everything else is superfluous.
You believe his intentions pure and aligned with your position. I believe it's a facade.
Have I mischaracterized your position?
It's not a desire to speak truthfully and plainly. I actually endorse the use of emotional stories to drive your position forward. It's incredibly effective.
Baked into your advocacy on this one, though, is the presumption that Vance is, in fact, /ourguy/ and this emotional language is cleverly designed to bring about the state you and I want.
I don't believe he's /ourguy/. Therefore, I can only look at this language as a means to bring about the state that they want, which is more money for Indians.
If it was for our goals, they would just end H-1Bs, not put a slightly annoying suspension on PERM.
I think you might be conflating the effect of H-1Bs on the American workforce as you see it with the design of the language.
I agree with your take on the effect. I simply disagree with the perceived intentions of Vance.
Of course, in all honesty, I'm slow with politics, and I literally found out the "Greatest Steel Mill in American History" had its contract given to an Indian company just an hour ago.
When I saw this clip of Vance shortly after, I didn't greet it with the same open-mindedness I might have otherwise. All I see is carefully-worded language that's there to appease just before midterms.
"A temporary suspension," "a suspension on PERM (not H-1B)," "indentured servants," and the like lead me to believe this is just a route to grant them better wages in the future, not to do the thing you and I want: stop foreign people from profiting at our expense.
I no longer trust any of this.
@DineshDSouza If it's telling the truth, then we should separate the nations.
Sounds kind of like nationalism, right?
Seriously, you can't even go a day without contradicting yourself?
The right has been slow in catching onto the fact that leftists are speaking a different language that just sounds the same. Every word of consequence has a different meaning.
Right-wingers will point out hypocrisies from the left and scratch their heads when it doesn't have the desired effect.
"Look at this racism. We're both against that, right?"
"It's against whites, so it doesn't fit our definition of racism."
"I agree that a good education can solve our problems."
"Yeah, and you're not educated (i.e. programmed with the proper views)."
Right-wingers hear words like "equality," "love," "education," and "-ism" and immediately roll over thinking, "Finally, a sensible leftist. I'll go along with this," and lose more due to their naiveté.
"Love of country." I see why you chose that word instead of nation.
Wouldn't want to go into the etymology of "nation" and point to the foundation of what a nation is, would we?
The so-called "elite" have nothing more than clever word games designed specifically to obfuscate.
Hiding behind a statement like, "The facts decide," shows your inability to understand the situation here.
This whole time you've been looking at the same facts as everyone else and coming to a ridiculous conclusion other people are obviously disagreeing with.
Ultimately, you want to decide what the ruling is. And if the statement of the "victim" doesn't back it up, then too bad, sweetheart, we decide for you.
It's just strategic infantilization.
@BeastSystemID@KimIversenShow Everyone's a fed. Didn't you know that?
Seeing someone take a screenshot with my joke about your mom's house is funny, though.
@KimIversenShow Where in my post did I tell you to wear a burka?
Am I part of the evil patriarchy for saying you shouldn't walk naked in an alleyway?
This is retarded.
@KimIversenShow No one's falling for this type of shit anymore.
If you walk down an alleyway naked at 3AM and something happens, it's probably illegal. But, you're also a stupid whore.
No more kiddie gloves for women.