this is probably the most blatant symbolism of two ppl losing their innocence in the eyes of the church bc the church views their love as smth perverted and sinful ever
@Donkersman if two lambs playing in front of a cross (PLAYING; do look up animal behavior) makes you feel like shit, I think it tells more about you than it does about the the artist and their art.
I've seen quotes about this too many times on the TL alr, esp. the 2nd.
Art is meant to comfort the disturbed and disturb the comforted. If it disturbs you, it's working. If it's just meant to be pretty and soft and toned down, what's the point of critical thinking?
@Isjetenk If a painting of happy children makes me happy, the art is working. If a painting of dead children makes me uncomfortable, sad, disturbed, then the art is working. It would make me reflect on the horrors inflicted on these innocents. It's literally not that hard to understand
I know that when touching these themes I must tread carefully, and it's up to my skill now to prove I'm not going to mishandle it. but I also don't want to be entirely careful that I'm practically censoring it.
sigh.
A very classic example of this misinterpretation is of course, Lolita.
Of course the readers can interpret it the way they want. I know I shouldn't treat them as dumb but I guess, it's just the current amounts of media illiteracy that scares me 🫤
I'm having a problem.
my story touches on themes of abuse and trauma, mental and physical health, and classism. this entire work actually started as a commentary on the last one. now that I'm nearing the end, I feel like I'm shying of its potential out of fear that-
the readers might misunderstood them, the symbols, everything else. writing from the perspective of the antagonists make it even more daunting; not everyone can pick up that it doesn't mean to glorify the issues, but to dissuade it.