Newslaundry and Abhinandan Sekhri are sick and twisted: For hours after the rape conviction of Tarun Tejpal, their article and tweet shaming his victim were live
@Sagarshriti1 explains why their ‘apology’ is a sham
https://t.co/SAF2fdlwb9
Laundering the crime failed.
Now @AbhinandanSekhr speaking exactly like Rapist #Tejpal - as if fault was of others. #AckThoo Remember they had that piece shaming Victim for 12 years before his stinking skull realised it needs laundering before the news.
Women are relegated to the lowest position in the Liberal hierarchy of victimhood
@immortalsoulin writes about how Tarun Tejpal’s victim being shamed by ‘liberals’, including NewsLaundry, is the perfect example
https://t.co/96Zpa049fA
The Wire peddles, yet again, its interview with foreign-funded scamster bishop Joseph D’Souza to spread propaganda against the FCRA bill.
https://t.co/eRfLb3Sets
The Wire is basically platforming a bishop who spearheaded an anti-India, anti-Hindu campaign, lying about Christian persecution, is accused of a scam worth crores and violated FCRA rules himself, to lie about the proposed FCRA amendments which would tighten the screws around scamsters like him.
@AditiSi94 debunks his lies.
Tarun Tejpal’s conviction exposes a disturbing pattern: when the accused is ideologically useful, the Left-liberal ecosystem often turns sceptical of the woman instead.
From victim-blaming Tejpal’s accuser to defending other alleged predators, the record raises serious questions about selective feminism.
If women’s rights depend on who the accused is, it isn’t feminism; it’s ideological convenience.
https://t.co/nU37ZZlAON
Newslaundry’s selective outrage on women’s rights rings hollow amid allegations of a toxic workplace culture and its handling of rape-related controversies.
Abhinandan Sekhri interviewed Tarun Tejpal, while his sister defended the rape-accused and attacked his victim.
Now, former employees are raising questions about sexual-harassment complaints at Newslaundry. Time for some accountability at home.
https://t.co/zPI4Azujkm
Sexual harassment allegations against Newslaundry?
https://t.co/B0OlCbMJzH
As people recount their whitewashing of rapist Tarun Tejpal, former employees speak up
(writes @dibakardutta_)
In India, if you speak fluent English, have attended the ‘right’ schools and colleges, and belong to the ‘one of us’ social circle, you don’t commit rape. Or sexual harassment.
Nooo!
It’s just banter. Harmless flirting.
The problem is, that you were too naive (or should we say stupid?) to know the difference.
And if you dare speak up. We will make you pay.
All endorsed by the ladies who wear feminism on their sleeve by day and pander to powerful men to protect their place in the hierarchy.
Oops. I meant patriarchy.
🚨Admission of deliberate content manipulation?
Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg apologised after officials admitted to receiving payment for promoting certain types of content.
Triggered by the removal of PM Modi's video, the admission of paid amplification reveals Meta has blurred the line between a neutral intermediary and an active publisher.
https://t.co/L0cgrAZp7u
🚨 US Congressman Riley Moore claims India's FCRA Amendment Bill will let the government "take over churches" and even warns of damage to India-US ties.
But what does the Bill actually say?
@immortalsoulin examines the law, the foreign funding ecosystem, missionary networks, and why tighter FCRA oversight has triggered such strong opposition.
https://t.co/594Ea2eZaQ
Recent excavations in Gobichettipalayam place the arrival of Thomas at least 660 years before the birth of Jesus Christ, thereby placing Christians in India even earlier than what was fancied. Artefacts such as the old Apple Watch that Thomas used to wear strengthen this claim.
Meta chief Mark Zuckerberg apologises for child sexual abuse material and deepfake content; admits money was paid for "boosting a certain type of content".
In 2020, Meta appointed Muslim Brotherhood figure Tawakkul Karman to its Facebook Oversight Board.
https://t.co/le4iweNlnp
When US Congressman Riley Moore calls India's FCRA a "war on Christians," it's worth asking: What exactly was #FCRA trying to stop? @ashu_nauty
https://t.co/1VRUwG1FQZ
Parliament gave Meta three days to explain the 'technical glitch' that made the Prime Minister's video vanish. At the exact same time, Meta deleted OpIndia’s post that criticized them for it.
It shows selective glitches, selective free speech, and selective accountability. Censoring criticism while being questioned by Parliament doesn't look like a technical error, it looks intentional.
Ramu Kaka wasn’t just a name, it was Bollywood’s quiet way of reducing Bhagavan Rama to a dhoti-clad servant. 😡
There were several movies, Khoon Bhari Maang, Amar Deep, Sholay, Deewar, Patanga and many more, that featured the same character: Ramu Kaka.
An elderly, dhoti-clad family servant. Loyal. Often the emotional anchor of the household. Always named Ramu.
Why this name? Why repeatedly link the most revered name in our civilization with a servile, stereotypical role?
It didn’t stop at names.
Bollywood repeatedly demeaned our culture, our rituals, and our deities.
In this scene 👇🏽, Rajesh Khanna arrives with two large bottles of liquor on Diwali. He casually asks a woman to hold them, but stops his Muslim driver from doing so, saying alcohol is haram in Islam.
A small scene, but it reflects how even popular films didn't mind crossing lines with Hinduism but preserved the boundaries of Islam.
This was the pill Bollywood gave us in the name of Secularism.