vicodark.eth

libertarian / #bitcoin is truth / #deathtofiat / #endthefed / #NOLATillYaDie

[vicodark.eth @vicodark2]

I'm hoping that this is some AI-generated propaganda. Otherwise she's just an idiot.

[Retard Finder @IfindRetards]

Kamala Harris was asked about her thought process when deciding to run for president in 2028, her answer is some of the most retarded word salad you will ever hear.

[vicodark.eth @vicodark2]

@PeterMcCormack yep

[vicodark.eth @vicodark2]

Yep.

[Peter Schiff @PeterSchiff]

Thanks to Donald Trump, we now have two Democratic parties. With the defeat of @RepThomasMassie for being a principled fiscal conservative, the Republican Party basically exists in name only. We have two big-government political parties, each offering its own brand of socialism.

[Thomas Massie for Congress @MassieforKY]

@Erin_Houchin @realDonaldTrump @TeamTrump @EdGallrein How do his boots taste?

[Peter Schiff @PeterSchiff]

Yes, @RepThomasMassie voted with Democrats to oppose Trump's Iran war. But had Biden started the same war, Massie would've voted with Republicans to oppose it. The difference is Massie votes his conscience and honors his oath to support the Constitution. The rest are party hacks.

[vicodark.eth @vicodark2]

#truth

[Linda @LndamyDark]

George Carlin was way ahead of his time! Anybody know what year this was from? Too bad we didn't listen.

[Rand Paul @RandPaul]

The DOJ has ONE WEEK left to charge Anthony Fauci for the worst cover-up in modern medical history.

He lied to Congress about funding gain-of-function research in Wuhan. Millions died. Trillions were spent. And Fauci walked away with book deals and fawning media coverage instead of handcuffs. I re-upped my criminal referral to the DOJ because the evidence is overwhelming, and justice has been delayed long enough.

RT if you’re ready to see Fauci behind bars.

[vicodark.eth @vicodark2]

This is insane.

[Sama Hoole @SamaHoole]

Diabetes is, by definition, a disease in which the body has lost the ability to handle glucose.

Glucose is the molecule carbohydrates break down into when they are digested. This is not in dispute. This is in every textbook, on every Diabetes UK page, on every NHS leaflet.

The standard NHS dietary recommendation for an adult with diabetes is approximately 130 to 225 grams of carbohydrate per day, distributed across 3 regular meals, with starchy foods featured prominently at each one.

The disease is the inability to process the substance.
The recommended diet is the substance.

They then prescribe a drug to help the patient process the substance the leaflet just told them to eat.

The drug is paid for by the NHS.
The leaflet is written by the NHS.
The disease is managed by the NHS.

Nobody appears to find the loop strange. The loop is the system.

[vicodark.eth @vicodark2]

I'm going to get a steak right the f now.

[Sama Hoole @SamaHoole]

8000 BC: "Plants are what we eat when the hunt fails."

3000 BC: "Grain and vegetables are what we feed the slaves."

500 BC: "Lentils and barley are the diet of the poor."

100 AD: "Bread and circuses for the mob. The legions get meat."

1200s: "Pottage and roots are what the serf gets. The lord eats venison."

1700s: "Vegetables and porridge are what the starving eat."

1800s: "The Irish are surviving on potatoes. The landlords are exporting the beef."

1900s: "Plants and grain are wartime filler. We're rationing the real food."

1950s: "Plants are cheap. Feed them to the poor."

1970s: "Plants should be the BASE of the pyramid. This is science."

1990s: "Plant-based is emerging as extremely healthy, actually."

2010s: "Plant-based is optimal. Meat is the problem."

2020s: "Plant-based is saving the planet!"

2025: "Plant-based is the healthiest diet on earth. The science is settled."

You: noticing that the diet currently being sold as enlightened and optimal is the same one every ruling class in recorded history fed to the people it was trying to keep weak, compliant, and grateful.

[vicodark.eth @vicodark2]

Yup.

[k @alfkkifine]

The internet constantly tells women that men are terrible listeners because the second a woman starts venting about her day, the man immediately interrupts to offer a logical solution. We are taught to view this as him being dismissive, emotionally unintelligent, or invalidating our feelings.

​The strict, unpopular truth is that to a man, fixing the problem is his absolute highest, most desperate form of empathy.
​Women vent to connect; we want our partner to just sit in the dark with us and validate the emotion. But men are hardwired to view the woman they love being in distress as an active threat. When he immediately offers a spreadsheet, a strategy, or a solution to your problem, he isn't trying to silence you. His brain has recognized that something in the world is hurting his partner, and his immediate, visceral instinct is to assassinate the thing causing you pain.

We constantly shame men for "not just listening," completely ignoring the fact that his attempt to fix your life is his most profound declaration of love.

[vicodark.eth @vicodark2]

Wow.

[Mindset Machine  @mindsetmachine]

A brain expert just said what no one wants to hear about screen learning.🤯

[Bojan Tunguz @tunguz]

A very useful flowchart.

[vicodark.eth @vicodark2]

@BoringBiz_ Hahaah

[Scott Lincicome @scottlincicome]

Your annual Donald Rumsfeld IRS Tax Day Letter appreciation post.

[vicodark.eth @vicodark2]

So true

[John Mappin @JohnMappin]

This communication from Tucker Carlson and his company is very true very worrying and extremely gracious.

Every American and International observer should read it.

[Wayne Waldrop @WayneWaldropW]

Why I would vote for Thomas Massie in 2028:

- He wants to reduce spending
- He wants to End the Fed
- He supports food freedom
- He supports National Constitutional Carry
- He exposed the Epstein class
- He is already against the next war
- He doesn't accept AIPAC money
- He wants to put an end to omnibus bills
- He votes on principle, not to appease a political party

Would Thomas Massie have your vote?

[vicodark.eth @vicodark2]

I've often said similar.

[Brivael Le Pogam @brivael]

Il y a une phrase que j'adore : "Je suis communiste avec ma famille, socialiste avec mes amis, libéral avec mon pays, et capitaliste avec le reste du monde."

Cette phrase est brillante parce qu'elle résume l'erreur numéro un que font les gens quand ils réfléchissent aux systèmes économiques : appliquer ce qui marche à petite échelle à grande échelle sans comprendre que la complexité des systèmes change tout.

Le communisme avec ta famille ça marche. Tu partages tout, tu ne comptes pas, chacun donne selon ses capacités et reçoit selon ses besoins. Et ça fonctionne. Parce que tu es 4 ou 5 personnes, que tu connais tout le monde intimement, que la confiance est totale, que la tricherie est impossible à cacher, et que l'amour remplace les incitations économiques.

Le socialisme avec tes amis ça marche aussi. Un groupe de 20-30 personnes. Tu partages les restos, tu aides un pote à déménager, tu files un coup de main sans compter. La réciprocité est naturelle parce que tu connais chaque personne et que ta réputation est en jeu.

Mais dès que tu passes à l'échelle d'un pays, 68 millions de personnes, tout s'effondre. Pourquoi ? Parce que la complexité des systèmes est non linéaire. S'organiser à 5 c'est trivial. S'organiser à 50 c'est difficile. S'organiser à 50 millions c'est un problème d'une complexité fondamentalement différente. C'est pas juste "plus dur". C'est qualitativement un autre problème.

À grande échelle, tu ne connais plus les gens. La confiance disparaît. La tricherie devient invisible. Les passagers clandestins prolifèrent. L'information nécessaire pour coordonner 68 millions de personnes dépasse la capacité de n'importe quel planificateur central. C'est le problème du calcul économique de Mises (1920) et de l'information dispersée de Hayek (1945). Un cerveau central ne peut pas traiter l'information que des millions de prix de marché transmettent en temps réel.

C'est exactement pour ça que le communisme produit des familles heureuses et des pays morts. Le modèle ne scale pas. Pas parce que les gens sont méchants. Parce que la complexité des systèmes rend la coordination centralisée impossible au-delà d'un certain seuil.

Et c'est l'erreur de jugement fondamentale que font la plupart des gens qui adhèrent aux thèses marxistes. Ils prennent leur expérience du partage en famille ou entre amis, un modèle qui marche à 5-20 personnes, et ils l'extrapolent à 68 millions de personnes en ignorant complètement l'émergence de la complexité. "Si ça marche chez moi, ça devrait marcher pour le pays." Non. La physique des systèmes complexes dit exactement le contraire.

Le marché libre c'est le seul système qui scale. Parce qu'il ne dépend pas de la confiance personnelle, ni de la bonne volonté, ni d'un planificateur omniscient. Il dépend de prix qui transmettent l'information, d'incitations qui alignent les comportements, et de la concurrence qui corrige les erreurs. C'est un système conçu pour fonctionner avec des inconnus, à n'importe quelle échelle.

Sois communiste avec ta famille. Socialiste avec tes amis. Et libéral avec tout le reste. Parce que la taille du système détermine le modèle qui fonctionne. Pas tes bonnes intentions.

[vicodark.eth @vicodark2]

Giant, full-throated yuuuuuuuup.

[Matt Van Swol @mattvanswol]

Maybe the people saying Black people are too stupid to get an ID to vote… are the racists.

Maybe the people saying married women can’t figure out how to get a birth certificate… are the sexists.

Maybe the people calling everyone else a threat to democracy… are the ones trying to rig it.

Maybe the people obsessed with “equity” while ignoring merit… are the ones holding people back.

Maybe the people who can’t name a single limit on immigration… are the extremists.

Maybe the people who say they’re fighting for the working class… while flying private, actually aren’t.

Maybe the people who say they care about the poor… have run every major American city for 50 years and made them ALL worse.

Maybe the people calling for more gun control… travel with armed security paid for by taxpayers.

Maybe the people who claim to love science… but can’t define what a woman is aren’t following it.

Maybe the people demanding unity while calling half the country fascists… don’t actually want unity.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

Maybe it was never about justice, equity, tolerance, or democracy.

Maybe it was always about power.

And maybe the way you know that, is that they never stop accusing YOU of exactly what THEY are doing.