Artiste numérique, Prompt engineer et Oléiculteur familial. Adobe, ClipStudio, MidJourney et Picholine.
| Only Share Useful Content for professionals |
J'ai mis à jour mon Livre 5 du French Cook dédié à Midjourney : Le Plat Principal Tome 2. C'est 300 pages désormais | Ouaaaiiiii (+160 p par rapport à la version originale) et c'est payant | Haaaaa ...
https://t.co/7ek9pymyc0
Most AI image tools start with a prompt.
Adobe Illustrator starts with your sketch. https://t.co/vsAnQ7iNWV
#Adobe#AdobeIllustrator#GraphicDesign#AIArt
What stands out for me is that it feels less like generating artwork and more like collaborating with my own creative process.
The new Concept to Vector feature in Adobe Illustrator lets me drop in a rough drawing or low-res image, then explore multiple vector directions while keeping my original idea at the center of the process.
Learn more here: https://
https://t.co/1S4Bt1A91X
#AdobeAmbassadors #Ad @AdobeFirefly@creativecloud
Linus Torvalds calls AI a revolution that changes absolutely nothing fundamental in programming.
from his recent talk at Open Source Summit 2026:
"When I see people saying 99% of our code is written by AI, I literally get angry. Because those same people, I can pretty much guarantee, 100% of their code is written by compilers. But they never say that."
he's clearly not anti-ai. he literally said compilers are good. he said this is good too.
revolution, yes.
end of programming, no.
he genuinely believes AI is making programmers more productive but this is not the first time a massive productivity shift has happened in the field.
Parlons foot, en 2025 et 2026, toutes les IA se sont plantées quant à la désignation du vainqueur de la Champion League. Cette année, cela devait être 1/ Arsenal 2/ Bayern. En 2025, c'était FC Barcelone. À chaque match du PSG, dès les 8eme, l'adversaire était donné gagnant. :/
Hasbro has spent decades finding new ways to bring their characters to life, through toys, film, games, theme parks, and more. Today, they took the next step.
Developers, enterprises, and app and experience builders can now integrate rights-cleared voices for Hasbro characters like Cobra Commander, Megatron, Col. Mustard, and Optimus into their products and experiences via the ElevenLabs Iconic Marketplace.
Guillermo del Toro says new filmmakers should tell their own stories and accept years of hard work. But AI changes the rules. Instead of waiting years and begging studio bosses for money, AI lets anyone make a movie in months. He thinks shortcuts ruin art, but AI just removes the need for permission and big budgets so everyone can finally be heard.
Martin Scorsese has joined a generative AI startup as a partner and advisor.
He adds that he has used AI during pre-production to help with storyboarding — “with this tool, I can share what I’m visualizing more clearly & efficiently to my creative team — the production designer, art designer and cinematographer.”
(Source: https://t.co/LJlx5ylxvr)
Martin Scorsese is now a partner and advisor for a generative AI startup
He says he's using AI during preproduction to help storyboard projects
“I’m interested in the intersection of technology and storytelling, and seeing how that can push the bounds of creativity to create deeper and richer experiences for audiences ... cinema is a young medium ... we have to be open to how it can evolve"
(via @nytimes)
Pour les assises, j'ai réalisé une petite vidéo, qui mêlait video IA (Midjourney), 3D Blender (export transparent), animation 2D, puis montage sous Capcut. C'était juste une video pour occuper le temps pendant que les gens s'installent. Il y a des maladresses, mais ça passe.
Ce jeudi, il y a eu les 2es Assises Nationales de l'Oléiculture Familiale à Nîmes Métropole en présence du maire de Nîmes (+ président de la métropole). La moitié des visuels sur les slides et rollovers, c'est de l'IA (Midjourney, Firefly, ChatGPT) + retouches Photoshop/Wacom
Il y a un gars qui a fait une grosse combinaison de sref. Le résultat est sympa. J'ai "amélioré" le truc avec 1 de mes profiles. Je vais essayer de faire pas mal d'image pour créer un nouveau profile. Dès que c'est fait, je le file. Prompt : juste prénom et nom. C'est juste.
Fini de tailler les oliviers et de débroussailler. Retour à des choses plus terre à terre : l'IA. Sinon cette année, il va y avoir une énorme production d 'olives. En Espagne, ça annonce déjà que les prix vont chuter à cause de la surproduction. Le prix de l'huile devrait baisser
Gareth Edwards is excited about AI filmmaking
"It’s so clearly a tool that might be up there with the camera"
He says AI has 'no taste whatsoever' when it comes to generating human stories, but is a 'fucking genius' at helping filmmakers organize ideas, test concepts, and produce images
“I view it like having a second-unit director who is a billionaire on acid”
He eventually wants to make a hybrid generative AI film
(via @THR)
Tomorrow we premiere Hell Grind in Cannes.
It's a first 95-minute AI film, made entirely on Higgsfield.
The budget was under $500K, with $400K going to compute.
The first 25 minutes needed 16,181 generations for 253 shots.
A traditional film would cost from $50M.
Filmmaking is changing.
Ben Affleck on the single hardest thing for AI to learn in creative work:
He breaks down how large language and video models actually work, and where they fall short:
"A library of vectors of meaning and transformers that interpret context… But they're just cross-pollinating things that exist. Nothing new is created."
Affleck concedes the point but pivots to the deeper issue of taste:
"Craftsman is knowing how to work. Art is knowing when to stop. And I think knowing when to stop is going to be a very difficult thing for AI to learn because it's taste."
He adds that current AI also suffers from "lack of consistency, lack of controls, lack of quality."
But Affleck is clear-eyed about where AI will hit hard. The visual effects industry is in his crosshairs:
"I wouldn't like to be in the visual effects business. They're in trouble because what cost a lot of money is now going to cost a lot less and it's going to hammer that space more than it already is."
His take: maybe it shouldn't take a thousand people to render something.
AI will make backgrounds more convincing, change the color of a shirt, fix mistakes. It might even let studios produce "two seasons of House of the Dragon in a year instead of one."
That's compression, not replacement.
Affleck then makes a fascinating prediction about where AI actually creates value long-term, and it's in consumption rather than production:
"Eventually AI will allow you to ask for your own episode of succession where you could say, I'll pay $30 and can you make me a 45 minute episode..."
@BenAffleck sees this as the real opportunity:
"My hope for AI is that it's an additional revenue stream that can replace DVD which took 15 to 20% out of the economy of filmmaking."
He imagines a future of negotiated visual rights, where fans can buy an "Iron Man pack" and look like the Avengers in their own TikToks, the same way they used to buy Halloween costumes at the store.
The throughline of Affleck's framework is simple: craftsmanship can be automated, but art is knowing when to stop, and that requires taste.
Roger Penrose, Nobel Prize-winning physicist and mathematician, explains why we should stop calling it AI and start calling it "artificial cleverness":
He believes the entire field is mislabelled, and the label itself is doing damage.
His objection is simple but cuts deep:
"The name is wrong. It's not artificial intelligence. It's not intelligence. Intelligence would involve consciousness. Well, if it's a machine, it's not conscious."
For Penrose, people have confused raw computing power with genuine understanding.
"People have lost the plot. They've lost it in the power of computing. The thing is that computers have got so powerful that they've lost the thread of what they're doing. But I think consciousness is something different. It's not computational."
He believes the term itself has hypnotized people into a category error:
"People are so hypnotized. The trouble is that AI is a bad term. It means artificial intelligence. Now intelligence in my view is conscious. That's what intelligence is about."
So he proposes a rename. Artificial Cleverness. AC instead of AI.
To illustrate the distinction, Penrose draws on his experience teaching mathematics:
"You have mathematics students. Some of them understand what they're doing. Some are just clever. They can repeat what they've learned. They know how to do it very cleverly. They can calculate very well, but they don't necessarily understand what they're doing."
That gap, between calculating well and actually understanding, is the gap Penrose sees between today's machines and genuine intelligence.
Cleverness can be manufactured. Consciousness, in his view, cannot.
So the question worth sitting with: when we call a system "intelligent," are we describing what it does, or quietly assuming something about what it is?