What Iran is saying is they've reverse engineered the MRR warhead on the MOP and will use it, and pretend its another impossibly large but "conventional" explosion.
☢️ Why is the US running a MOAB PSYOP on Iran? /📄
It's very rare to hear the US media speak about specific munitions. If they ever talk about war, it's usually about delivery systems such as F-22s and B-2 which excite the laymen. Never munitions.
Yet, all over the news, almost in unison, everyone is now talking about MOABs with regard to Iran. Even Trump! In an interview Trump stated, in short that:
1. He may have to use a MOAB.
2. America is strong, doesn't need to use a nuke.
3. MOAB is totally conventional and definite not a nuke.
4. ... It's like a tiny nuke. (his words)
Why is the sitting president of the most powerful country in the world talking about munitions and what brought it up in the first place?
The MOAB is an extremely impractical weapon. It requires a complicated parachute/cradle/separation system that is normally used to deploy armoured vehicles into battlefields, which is why the only aircraft capable of deploying it is the C-130. Flying such a large and slow airplane into Iran is a suicide mission. Doing it to drop the equivalent of 20 Mk84s. It's never going to happen.
Why would they even bother? Three F-15s can carry 21 Mk84s and the area of damage that can be created by those bombs can be far more damaging than the ~10 tons of a MOAB.
It's obviously a cover for a nuclear strike.
The majority of people around the world are barely sentient enough to breathe. Even without Trump prompting them, the moment they see a mushroom cloud and all the signs of a nuclear attack, they fall back to the regular pre-programmed excuses:
1. It's a MOAB (their favorite one).
2. It's an ammo dump (even on open ground or high in the sky)
3. It's thermobaric (they're unaware of how these look like or how small these bombs are despite plenty of footage online)
4. They would tell us if nukes are used, the camera man's eyes would melt like in the movies, and plenty of other ret*rded nonsense.
But let's skip these idiots, nothing will convince them, not even being mortally wounded by a nuclear strike. Let's talk about why Trump is doing this and the consequences, if Iran doesn't chicken out as I sadly expect it to.
The purpose of the coming nuclear strike on Iran isn't to take out Pickaxe mountain but to take out critical infrastructure. To destroy Iran itself. Nothing Trump has done so far has achieved this. Almost all bombed targets were repaired quickly with spare parts. There's a precedent for this: WWII Germany, whose industrial capacity increased despite allied strategic bombing.
Here's how it works: A cruise missile of a 2000 pound bomb can damage certain sensitive sites, destroy civilian cement structures or kill people. But it cannot dent a large industrial facility. You can do the math and calculate the over pressure. Bombs have kill mechanisms that either work by distributing shrapnel or using the blast damage of the high explosive mixture inside. Neither of which are effective against heavy industry.
Not convinced? Remember Azovstal heavy ironworks in Ukraine, Mariupol? Despite weeks of bombardment by Russia, including the deployment of 3 ton bombs (comparable to the MOAB), the facility wasn't even scratched.
In contrast, a carefully calibrated nuclear air burst can flatten whatever infrastructure is below it. There will be nothing left to save or repair. Just debris where a factory or industrial facility was.
This is the only way the Americans now believe they can bring Iran to heel. By doing this attack sequence once (destroying something inside Iran, likely insignificant), showing that:
* Iran is too chicken sh*t to announce it was struck by a nuclear weapon (a catastrophic position to be in if one doesn't have the ability or will to retaliate, just announcing it can cause a state to collapse).
* The world will remain silent as it has with all previous nuclear strikes, especially the most recent one on Syria which has been proven to be nuclear beyond any reasonable doubt (down to radioactive soil samples).
* The American public is so dumbed down that they'll buy the MOAB cover without question.
* The attack can be repeated as many times as necessary to get Iran to surrender.
In short, these nuclear strikes will be demonstration or de-escalation strikes. Meant to stop the war by demonstrating a lack of ability or will on one party's behalf.
If this sounds insane, consider what is at stake. The US's allies in the region have been disrupted to such a degree that there is hardly any oil export coming out of the middle east. The world is living off strategic petroleum reserves which as rapidly being drained. There's no time left. Iran either opens the Hormuz or the world suffers the most catastrophic energy and food crisis in history -- and everyone will blame Israel and the US.
The fall out would be worse than a nuclear war. We are talking mass starvation, and the complete absence of fuel for billions and billions of people. The death toll will be in the same unit as that you expect from a nuclear war: megadeaths. So the closure of the Hormuz has crossed into that threshold.
Can Iran stop this from unfolding? Perhaps. One strategy is to call out the PSYOP -- but I don't expect them to do this. They have carried out clandestine attacks of their own and keeping the public ignorant about limited nuclear warfare is in the interest of every nuclear state including Iran.
An alternative is to preemptively carry out an attack of its own, targeting the very infrastructure required to carry out the nuclear attack. This would not only directly stop the attack, but it will also demonstrate the will necessary to fight the coming nuclear war.
/End
P.S. I fully expect the US to transition to talking up the MOP and B-2 again after enough people realise the MOAB is not deployable over Iran. It's the same BS with another munition.
It's now very clear that the US is preparing a nuclear strike against Iran. It's the only lever Trump has left. The MOAB talk is being spread by military illiterate people. It cannot be dropped by any practical bomber that has access to Iran's airspace.
It's to excuse the large explosion to come.
Multiple Arab leaders are now foretelling a disaster to come, meaning they agreed to support the US and know the inevitable reaction from Iran.
Iran's mistake will be, yet again, a failure to preempt. The best way to avoid a nuclear strike on your territory is to carry out a preemptive nuclear strike of your own, against the forces that could carry it out.
Saudi Arabia is currently on the @StateDept's level 3 reconsider travel list.
I would argue after this incident it should be raised to level 4 do not travel.
I would not be surprised if this is a false flag by the Saudis to try and drag the US into their failed war in Yemen.
🚨 The situation between Yemen and Saudi Arabia has severely deteriorated. /📄
1. Saudi Arabia has imported 10,000 Syrian subh*mans to try and tilt the war in its favour. This is seen as a severe escalation by Ansarallah.
2. Savage Saudi Arabian bombardment of Sana'a continues, targeting innocent civilians.
3. Ansarallah has responded in kind and has destroyed an aircraft in the Saudi capital's international airport.
4. Aramco is being struck so hard it's difficult to keep track of all the targeted locations on FIRMS.
5. Ansarallah has now begun target the well sites directly, which is the most dangerous escalation yet. Should the support pump be destroyed, it's lights out for world oil for decades to come.
6. Ansarallah has now warned all employees of Saudi Arabia in any kind of civilian infrastructure program to vacate their facilities. This means Yemen is going to rightfully transition to total war on Saudi Arabia, targeting every piece of infrastructure there.
The Yemenis are doing the right thing, and this is going to be a key lesson to all the cowards, liars and traitors around the world. Yemen is risking everything already, there is no point in fighting the war half-heartedly. By bringing in the Syrian subh*mans into the battle, Saudi Arabia has indicated that it wishes to fight a prolonged war of attrition to get its way. There's no point doing that, Saudi Arabia cannot survive a war on its infrastructure. Yemen's infrastructure has already been destroyed. They have left them with nothing, and that means they have everything to gain.
God speed and God bless Yemen, may we see the end of the Saudi Arabian animals.
/End
Real world market is about to go into nightmare mode.
I spoke to some produce exporters. Many people have cancelled sowing this year. Fertiliser isn't coming and diesel is so expensive it's not profitable.
The world economy is on life support!
Once you're fooled into believing in a time-based origin and an impending end, you're in the grasp of satan.
Why do you think Cronus/Saturn/Khronos is the "God" of time? It traces things down to a single point of origin instead of accepting creation as something eternal & non-local.
This is how they convinced people to compete against each other instead of cooperating WITH each other. They still know the truth themselves so when you look at the organisations they create, you'll notice something -- it's all about cooperation on the inside. So why no cooperation on the outside? Because they require enslavement and only cooperation within their own parasitic core.
If you believe the universe begins and ends, then you will naturally map it down to thinking only of your own life beginning or ending, instead of thinking of eternity. You would never understand the true divine meaning of building something you'll never get to enjoy -- and the purpose of your species.
This preemptive campaign by Ansarallah has denied Saudi Arabia the ability to drag out the war by bringing in Turkey, Pakistan and the subh*mans that call themselves Syrians (*spit*).
No landing ports? No reinforcements, the fight will then turn to Marib as long as Aden is secured
I can't believe this but Taizz might be next to be liberated by Ansarallah and the Yemeni Centralised Command in Sana'a.
If Taizz falls, then Aden is next and Yemen wins the war.
It may have been a successful preemptive strike by Iran. if so they've tightened up their OODA loop significantly.
=> Remove political decision makers from loop [DONE].
=> Focus on ISR and HUMINT to get live data.
=> Avoid the tit-for-tat trap
=> Attack the moment the enemy focuses their power and resources
They've done this for airbases. There's no reason why this cannot be extended to ships. Are they worried that people will feel bad for the sailors? Don't, they're mostly brownoids by now.
Ok, I have an alternate scenario to explain the lack of anti-air action over Jordan.
There was nothing left to defend. If nothing was scrambled, and Iran continued to fire, it had everything pinned down.
8x F-15, 1x A-10 damaged? It's likely a LOT more + F-35s.
Ansarallah is moping the floor with the mercenaries and traitors. Saudi Arabian oil infrastructure is sustaining severe damage in its oil storage facilities. Pictured: Jazan.
(image sourced from @MerruX)