![kylenabecker's tweet photo. Debunking the Media's Claim That All of Trump's 2020 Election Challenges Were 'Baseless'
An Election Integrity review conducted on 92 court challenges filed over the 2020 election found that a clear majority of the cases decided on the merits were ruled favorably for the plaintiffs; particularly, the Republican Party and the Trump campaign.
The election review noted the cases decided on the merits and those that were dismissed for lack of standing or other procedural issues.
"Some Non-Merit reasons for stopping lawsuits from going forward are for: a) Standing, b) Timing [Laches], c) Judicial authority [Jurisdiction], and d) Moot (e.g. not enough malfeasance to make a difference)."
The list of court cases decided on the merits, meaning "the Plaintiff was able to argue the facts of the case, and, if applicable, given opportunity to present evidence via Discovery," as well as the links to the case information, can be found below.
“You’re gonna wanna bookmark this,” remarked Arizona Sun Times reporter @Rach_IC. “This is a compilation of all of the 2020 election challenges and what became of them. Despite the MSM lies that 60+ election challenges found no evidence of wrongdoing, there were actually 92 cases, with only 30 decided on the merits, and of those 30, Trump and/or the GOP plaintiff prevailed in 22 of them.”
The case entries, many linking to Stanford’s Healthy Election Project, confirm the statuses and the rulings.
It is debatable whether affirmative rulings in all of the cases would have been sufficient to lead to Donald Trump being elected instead of Joe Biden.
The pivotal lawsuit may have been the Texas case brought by AG Ken Paxton contending that a number of swing states made unconstitutional election changes, because they did not go through the state legislatures. This case was denied by the Supreme Court, despite the Constitution stipulating its original jurisdiction.
Furthermore, many states have since decided that 2020 election practices such as the inclusion of privately funded "Zuckerboxes" were either illegal or were subsequently outlawed.
It is up for debate whether any particular lawsuit would have been the deciding factor, but the critical underlying point is that the election challenges were legal and valid. The sum of these lawsuits paint the picture that the "fortified" 2020 election was highly flawed and undemocratic, since it did not abide by fundamental practices of election integrity.
Thus debunks a widespread narrative: Trump's legal challenges to the 2020 election were all “baseless.”](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F9iM0b0WYAEJBjC.jpg)
![kylenabecker's tweet photo. Debunking the Media's Claim That All of Trump's 2020 Election Challenges Were 'Baseless'
An Election Integrity review conducted on 92 court challenges filed over the 2020 election found that a clear majority of the cases decided on the merits were ruled favorably for the plaintiffs; particularly, the Republican Party and the Trump campaign.
The election review noted the cases decided on the merits and those that were dismissed for lack of standing or other procedural issues.
"Some Non-Merit reasons for stopping lawsuits from going forward are for: a) Standing, b) Timing [Laches], c) Judicial authority [Jurisdiction], and d) Moot (e.g. not enough malfeasance to make a difference)."
The list of court cases decided on the merits, meaning "the Plaintiff was able to argue the facts of the case, and, if applicable, given opportunity to present evidence via Discovery," as well as the links to the case information, can be found below.
“You’re gonna wanna bookmark this,” remarked Arizona Sun Times reporter @Rach_IC. “This is a compilation of all of the 2020 election challenges and what became of them. Despite the MSM lies that 60+ election challenges found no evidence of wrongdoing, there were actually 92 cases, with only 30 decided on the merits, and of those 30, Trump and/or the GOP plaintiff prevailed in 22 of them.”
The case entries, many linking to Stanford’s Healthy Election Project, confirm the statuses and the rulings.
It is debatable whether affirmative rulings in all of the cases would have been sufficient to lead to Donald Trump being elected instead of Joe Biden.
The pivotal lawsuit may have been the Texas case brought by AG Ken Paxton contending that a number of swing states made unconstitutional election changes, because they did not go through the state legislatures. This case was denied by the Supreme Court, despite the Constitution stipulating its original jurisdiction.
Furthermore, many states have since decided that 2020 election practices such as the inclusion of privately funded "Zuckerboxes" were either illegal or were subsequently outlawed.
It is up for debate whether any particular lawsuit would have been the deciding factor, but the critical underlying point is that the election challenges were legal and valid. The sum of these lawsuits paint the picture that the "fortified" 2020 election was highly flawed and undemocratic, since it did not abide by fundamental practices of election integrity.
Thus debunks a widespread narrative: Trump's legal challenges to the 2020 election were all “baseless.”](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F9iM0b0WYAAE23k.jpg)
![kylenabecker's tweet photo. Debunking the Media's Claim That All of Trump's 2020 Election Challenges Were 'Baseless'
An Election Integrity review conducted on 92 court challenges filed over the 2020 election found that a clear majority of the cases decided on the merits were ruled favorably for the plaintiffs; particularly, the Republican Party and the Trump campaign.
The election review noted the cases decided on the merits and those that were dismissed for lack of standing or other procedural issues.
"Some Non-Merit reasons for stopping lawsuits from going forward are for: a) Standing, b) Timing [Laches], c) Judicial authority [Jurisdiction], and d) Moot (e.g. not enough malfeasance to make a difference)."
The list of court cases decided on the merits, meaning "the Plaintiff was able to argue the facts of the case, and, if applicable, given opportunity to present evidence via Discovery," as well as the links to the case information, can be found below.
“You’re gonna wanna bookmark this,” remarked Arizona Sun Times reporter @Rach_IC. “This is a compilation of all of the 2020 election challenges and what became of them. Despite the MSM lies that 60+ election challenges found no evidence of wrongdoing, there were actually 92 cases, with only 30 decided on the merits, and of those 30, Trump and/or the GOP plaintiff prevailed in 22 of them.”
The case entries, many linking to Stanford’s Healthy Election Project, confirm the statuses and the rulings.
It is debatable whether affirmative rulings in all of the cases would have been sufficient to lead to Donald Trump being elected instead of Joe Biden.
The pivotal lawsuit may have been the Texas case brought by AG Ken Paxton contending that a number of swing states made unconstitutional election changes, because they did not go through the state legislatures. This case was denied by the Supreme Court, despite the Constitution stipulating its original jurisdiction.
Furthermore, many states have since decided that 2020 election practices such as the inclusion of privately funded "Zuckerboxes" were either illegal or were subsequently outlawed.
It is up for debate whether any particular lawsuit would have been the deciding factor, but the critical underlying point is that the election challenges were legal and valid. The sum of these lawsuits paint the picture that the "fortified" 2020 election was highly flawed and undemocratic, since it did not abide by fundamental practices of election integrity.
Thus debunks a widespread narrative: Trump's legal challenges to the 2020 election were all “baseless.”](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F9iM0bzWAAAbZpz.jpg)
Olivia
Online
Average Joe
@volbraves
meh
Joined March 2023
62 Following
6 Followers
108 Posts
"I have not taken a penny from any foreign source ever in my life! ... I have not taken a single penny from any country whatsoever — EVER!"
— Joe Biden (10/22/20)
This video is heartbreaking. Illegal migrants are receiving free accommodations and healthcare while our veterans are suffering like this.
@MoreysSeafood I buy these packs several times a week. I have to say the last pack I purchased were the two most pathetic slivers of salmon I’ve ever seen. They’re usually twice this size.
Debunking the Media's Claim That All of Trump's 2020 Election Challenges Were 'Baseless'
An Election Integrity review conducted on 92 court challenges filed over the 2020 election found that a clear majority of the cases decided on the merits were ruled favorably for the plaintiffs; particularly, the Republican Party and the Trump campaign.
The election review noted the cases decided on the merits and those that were dismissed for lack of standing or other procedural issues.
"Some Non-Merit reasons for stopping lawsuits from going forward are for: a) Standing, b) Timing [Laches], c) Judicial authority [Jurisdiction], and d) Moot (e.g. not enough malfeasance to make a difference)."
The list of court cases decided on the merits, meaning "the Plaintiff was able to argue the facts of the case, and, if applicable, given opportunity to present evidence via Discovery," as well as the links to the case information, can be found below.
“You’re gonna wanna bookmark this,” remarked Arizona Sun Times reporter @Rach_IC. “This is a compilation of all of the 2020 election challenges and what became of them. Despite the MSM lies that 60+ election challenges found no evidence of wrongdoing, there were actually 92 cases, with only 30 decided on the merits, and of those 30, Trump and/or the GOP plaintiff prevailed in 22 of them.”
The case entries, many linking to Stanford’s Healthy Election Project, confirm the statuses and the rulings.
It is debatable whether affirmative rulings in all of the cases would have been sufficient to lead to Donald Trump being elected instead of Joe Biden.
The pivotal lawsuit may have been the Texas case brought by AG Ken Paxton contending that a number of swing states made unconstitutional election changes, because they did not go through the state legislatures. This case was denied by the Supreme Court, despite the Constitution stipulating its original jurisdiction.
Furthermore, many states have since decided that 2020 election practices such as the inclusion of privately funded "Zuckerboxes" were either illegal or were subsequently outlawed.
It is up for debate whether any particular lawsuit would have been the deciding factor, but the critical underlying point is that the election challenges were legal and valid. The sum of these lawsuits paint the picture that the "fortified" 2020 election was highly flawed and undemocratic, since it did not abide by fundamental practices of election integrity.
Thus debunks a widespread narrative: Trump's legal challenges to the 2020 election were all “baseless.”
![kylenabecker's tweet photo. Debunking the Media's Claim That All of Trump's 2020 Election Challenges Were 'Baseless'
An Election Integrity review conducted on 92 court challenges filed over the 2020 election found that a clear majority of the cases decided on the merits were ruled favorably for the plaintiffs; particularly, the Republican Party and the Trump campaign.
The election review noted the cases decided on the merits and those that were dismissed for lack of standing or other procedural issues.
"Some Non-Merit reasons for stopping lawsuits from going forward are for: a) Standing, b) Timing [Laches], c) Judicial authority [Jurisdiction], and d) Moot (e.g. not enough malfeasance to make a difference)."
The list of court cases decided on the merits, meaning "the Plaintiff was able to argue the facts of the case, and, if applicable, given opportunity to present evidence via Discovery," as well as the links to the case information, can be found below.
“You’re gonna wanna bookmark this,” remarked Arizona Sun Times reporter @Rach_IC. “This is a compilation of all of the 2020 election challenges and what became of them. Despite the MSM lies that 60+ election challenges found no evidence of wrongdoing, there were actually 92 cases, with only 30 decided on the merits, and of those 30, Trump and/or the GOP plaintiff prevailed in 22 of them.”
The case entries, many linking to Stanford’s Healthy Election Project, confirm the statuses and the rulings.
It is debatable whether affirmative rulings in all of the cases would have been sufficient to lead to Donald Trump being elected instead of Joe Biden.
The pivotal lawsuit may have been the Texas case brought by AG Ken Paxton contending that a number of swing states made unconstitutional election changes, because they did not go through the state legislatures. This case was denied by the Supreme Court, despite the Constitution stipulating its original jurisdiction.
Furthermore, many states have since decided that 2020 election practices such as the inclusion of privately funded "Zuckerboxes" were either illegal or were subsequently outlawed.
It is up for debate whether any particular lawsuit would have been the deciding factor, but the critical underlying point is that the election challenges were legal and valid. The sum of these lawsuits paint the picture that the "fortified" 2020 election was highly flawed and undemocratic, since it did not abide by fundamental practices of election integrity.
Thus debunks a widespread narrative: Trump's legal challenges to the 2020 election were all “baseless.”](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F9iM0b8WAAAmdOx.jpg)
Newly released footage shows Rep. Jamaal Bowman intentionally removing warning signs before pulling the fire alarm.
This was not a mistake. This was a deliberate act to disrupt a congressional proceeding.
Bowman was charged with only a misdemeanor.
It’s (D)ifferent.
Here’s ten minutes of every prominent Democrat denying Donald Trump won the presidential election in 2016. These same people now tell us questioning the result of a presidential election is a direct threat to our democracy.
New fair catch signal just dropped*
*if you’re beating Alabama at home and it’s right after halftime when Greg Sankey made a call chewing out the officiating crew
Real Braveheart 😂
https://t.co/7JxX1oJpZU
WATCH: Two individuals in NYC smirk as they rip down images of the missing women and children who Hamas terrorists took hostage
He tried to warn us… They hate us.
A 1000 year old Viking axe before and after restoration
Fight as one.
#AsOneATL
The media made sure everyone knew who the (8) R's were that sided with Gaetz, so it's up to us to let everyone know who the (8) leftist democrats are that sided with Hamas today
BREAKING: After wall to wall coverage that Trump “shared nuclear secrets with an Australian billionaire,” CBS News is now reporting that there is “no indication” this report is accurate.
Add one more hoax to the main stream media Hoax List.
According to CBS News’ Catherine Herridge, sources have told her that the original report has no basis in fact.
“Sources tell CBS News there is no indication former President Trump shared sensitive records with an Australian billionaire + no charges have been filed by the Special Counsel through their alleged discussion about US Nuclear subs was investigated.”
And they say X is the hub for misinformation. Unreal.
BREAKING: Total US debt rises by $275 billion in ONE DAY to a record $33.44 trillion, according to Zerohedge.
Exactly 2 weeks ago, total US debt hit $33 trillion for the first time ever.
This means that the US has added $32 billion in debt per day for the last 2 weeks.
At the current pace, the US will add $1 trillion of debt in a month.
The debt ceiling “crisis” is far from over.
The US added - checks notes - $275 billion in debt in, uh, ONE DAY
Total US debt is now $33.442 trillion, hit $33 trillion just 2 weeks ago, and on pace to rise by $1 trillion in 1 month.
WTF is going on
https://t.co/sJhw7nFCCG
Last Seen Users on Sotwe
رامي الاليف
Seen from United States
🤩
Seen from Thailand
Karem 20K
Seen from Egypt
The Monster dz♛
Seen from Algeria
Zahra2002 Akilahh
Seen from Egypt
thích mbbg
Seen from Vietnam
Penyuka Jilboobs
Seen from Indonesia
mujgan turkbikmaz
Seen from Turkey
Türk ünlü ifşa
Seen from Turkey
❌INNOCENT ❌
Seen from India
Most Popular Users
Elon Musk 
@elonmusk
240.4M followers
Barack Obama
@barackobama
119.3M followers
Donald J. Trump
@realdonaldtrump
111.7M followers
Cristiano Ronaldo
@cristiano
110.1M followers
Narendra Modi
@narendramodi
107M followers
Rihanna
@rihanna
97.5M followers
NASA
@nasa
92.1M followers
Justin Bieber
@justinbieber
90.8M followers
KATY PERRY
@katyperry
87.4M followers
Taylor Swift
@taylorswift13
81.2M followers
Lady Gaga
@ladygaga
72.8M followers
Kim Kardashian
@kimkardashian
69.7M followers
Virat Kohli
@imvkohli
69.5M followers
YouTube
@youtube
68.7M followers
Bill Gates
@billgates
63.7M followers
The Ellen Show
@theellenshow
62.5M followers
Neymar Jr
@neymarjr
62.2M followers
CNN
@cnn
61.9M followers
X
@x
60.8M followers
Selena Gomez
@selenagomez
60.5M followers