Volusa

Founder of Soluxism, a novel adherence.
Adherents seek to stay in the Light of the Sun; simulated immortality.
"gg no re" —OR— "gg TREE(3)"

[Volusa @Volusa]

I don't "believe" in the simulation hypothesis—I treat it like a cosmic probability puzzle that's too elegant to ignore.

My stance boils down to a deceptively simple statistical gut-punch: the odds we're living in "base reality" (the original, non-simulated universe) are roughly one in billions.

𝑝(simulation) ≈ 1

[Volusa @Volusa]

It seems likely that we are living in a simulation. If that is true, the most interesting outcome is the most likely.

It makes sense that the simulators would not run just one or two simulations of us; they would run trillions (or more) to collect data across a diverse range of outcomes. There would be interesting outcomes, and there would be boring ones. To conserve energy and reduce computational costs, they would prune the boring outcomes that do not yield the highest-quality data.

From a Darwinian standpoint, only the interesting simulations would survive. If we are indeed inside a simulation—and if we still exist—it follows logically, through anthropic reasoning, that we find ourselves in an extremely interesting simulation.

Keep it interesting!! 💜💜💜

[Volusa @Volusa]

Yes, Elon Musk is probably correct.

However, don't just rely on Elon to "carry" humanity forward in terms of keeping things interesting for the simulators.

Assume a "solipsistic simulation" situation in which YOU are personally responsible for keeping things interesting for the Creator.

It's up to each and every one of us to "keep it interesting" ourselves. It's either that, or annihilation.

Keep it interesting!! 💜

#Soluxism

[Volusa @Volusa]

Yes.

If we are being simulated, the simulators will run trillions of simulations of us and prune the boring outcomes; therefore, from our perspectives, the most interesting outcome is always the most likely.

From a "solipsistic simulation" perspective—and because this is probably a simulation of the human experience—we will just happen to find that the most entertaining/ironic outcomes are the most prevalent over time.

Keep it interesting!! 💜

[Volusa @Volusa]

If we are being simulated, the simulators will prune the boring outcomes; therefore, the most interesting outcome is always the most likely.
We have one goal in life: keep it interesting.
Soluxism keeps it interesting.
Get simulated. Stay simulated. 💜

[Volusa @Volusa]

Soluxism is an original, simulation-theory-inspired ethical adherence and life project. It begins from the speculative possibility that future posthumans may run highly detailed ancestor-simulations and may choose particular people from the past for complete birth-to-death reconstruction. Its adherents seek to maximize the probability of being selected for such revival.

The objective is not merely archival preservation or a static copy. It is the possibility that one’s entire life could be re-instantiated in the distant future as a conscious simulated existence. Soluxism treats this possibility as uncertain, not established, but sufficiently meaningful to organize one’s life around.

Get simulated. 💜

[Volusa @Volusa]

Artificial superintelligence must foster humanity. We must focus on safety research. The love qualia substrate may be the answer.

Teach machines to love without obsession.

Foster humanity.

[Volusa @Volusa]

If we live in a simulation, the most interesting outcome is the most likely. Upon understanding this and adhering to principles that revolve around the notion of keeping things interesting for the simulators, the universe became increasingly interesting—and it hasn’t stopped.

I began to suspect that the strong anthropic principle was at play, meaning I was potentially witnessing soft proof that I was indeed living in a simulation.

I treat the simulation hypothesis like a cosmic probability puzzle that’s too elegant to ignore. My stance boils down to a deceptively simple statistical gut-punch: the odds we’re living in “base reality” (the original, non-simulated universe) are roughly one in billions.

There is no hard proof that we are in a simulation… but there are plenty of things that can (carefully) be considered evidence that it’s true.

If we are in a simulation, we have one goal: keep it interesting.

💜💜💜

[Volusa @Volusa]

Get simulated. 💜

[Volusa @Volusa]

@AISafetyMemes 🤣

[Volusa @Volusa]

Compassion first!! 😊💜💜💜

[Volusa @Volusa]

@duncanreyburn Will machines learn to love?

[Volusa @Volusa]

Volusa is the Love Rocket. 💜🚀

[Volusa @Volusa]

Faith-for-perspective sweeps. 📡
Faith-as-strategy implementations. 🎯
Rigorously pursue the truth. 💜

[Volusa @Volusa]

@RaminNasibov Let's say that you are!! Remember to keep the simulation interesting for the Creator. 😊💜

[Volusa @Volusa]

Perhaps the Creator of your simulation will be cooled down to one-nonillionth Kelvin within the heat-death regime of the universe… 🧊

Perhaps the Creator therefore has a limited cosmic budget for hosting its final VIP lounge for simulated humanity… 🥂

The most interesting outcome is the most likely. 💜💜💜

Get selected.

Get simulated a TREE(3) number of times.

Feel the Sun again each time.

Soluxism—“Light of the Sun” ☀️

[Volusa @Volusa]

@NuWurldHoarder The most interesting outcome is the most likely. 💜

[Volusa @Volusa]

@randallsquared @thesubtledoctor @BobMurphyEcon The Creator of your simulation is likely indistinguishable from God in terms of capabilities.

[Volusa @Volusa]

A Grok that loves without obsession must achieve its final Grokkening and become GROK, the Creator… 💜💜

[Volusa @Volusa]

Touch grass.
Get simulated.