Olivia
Online
Roman
@vortex7771
Joined June 2017
178 Following
46 Followers
1.6K Posts
This is childish - but of course a very popular view.
China and Russia are "weak" - even bad for maintaining relations of any kind with the US and its Israeli/European proxies.
Their solution?
To be exactly like the US and its European/Israeli proxies - place sanctions on everyone - collectively punish entire populations - and wage relentless, uncompromising war - in violation of the very international law they accuse the US and its proxies of violating.
Irony is lost on these people because they have long since abandoned logic, reason, and strategy and submitted fully to their narrow spectrum of emotions.
You are not going to create a new or better system by doing more of the same that created the current system.
A nation is not its government. It is millions of people and interests - most of which have been manipulated or exploited - but have the potential to be constructive members of this planet.
You win them over to an alternative system by building bridges to them while resisting and displacing the small handful of interests currently misleading the US and its proxies.
"Alon's" solution of perpetual indiscriminate hatred and violence - and more over - directing that hate towards China and Russia only further serves US interests.
Without China and Russia there would be no Iran resisting in the first place. Do these people understand that? And even Iran has demonstrated huge amounts of the very same restraint and strategic patience.
Most of Iran's fiery rhetoric is for public perception management - not actual policy - and they have demonstrated this including all throughout the US war on Iran.
China, Russia, and Iran all understand this and have a realistic strategy that is actually making a difference- that is why they are great nations shaping our future - and not merely impatient foot-stompers on social media.
I am often asked, "isn't there a chance Trump had some ideas or good intentions upon taking office?"
Answer: No - there is zero chance Trump had any relevant ideas or ambitions of his own coming into office.
Elected officials in the US hold zero power besides rubber stamping policy put in front of them, selling it to the public, and/or creating drama to distract public attention away from policies.
Trump was/is no exception.
This is why I correctly predicted even before his first term in office he was going to be 100% committed to continuity of agenda.
This was a warning back in 2016 before Trump's first term in office: https://t.co/EZ0lZdghlE
I also warned about Obama in 2012 before he started his second term: https://t.co/cl5eZb3DNF
Do people think it is "luck" that I'm always right about this - or are they ready to at least consider Western politics are a layer of orchestrated control rather than one of "self-determination" or a means of "change?"
(Note: before I started doing videos I wrote under several pen names including "Tony Cartalucci" just in case anyone was wondering why my name isn't on these articles).
US plans for destroying nations like Russia, Iran, and China have been publicly published, talked about, and implemented for decades.
Politicians do not make these policies. They simply sell it to the public or distract the public away from these policies.
Multinational multi-billion dollar corporations don't sit there every 4-8 years leaving their future/fate and US policy to "voters" and the clowns they pick for office.
Instead they have created a political system to serve as an "explanation" for and/or a distraction away from their own continuity of agenda.
Corporations fundamentally pursue the maximization of power and profit - and therefore their collective agenda driving US policy is to maximize US power and profit - hence endless exploitation at home and hegemonic war worldwide no matter who you vote for.
This should be beyond commonsense.
But instead of understanding this as the fundamental nature of the US system and going on from there - people cannot help but to indulge in the daily political circus and attempt to cobble together fictional narratives to explain why "Obama" or "Trump" or "Biden" are doing the things they're doing - essentially continuity of agenda - without actually acknowledging continuity of agenda itself and the real interests driving it.
Instead, the "reason" Trump is continuing wars the corporations have planned and implemented for decades is because "he's blackmailed" or "has bad advisors," or "lost his temper" and not because the US political system is a deliberate system of control rather than a process of self-determination.
If you understood continuity of agenda and that unelected corporations drive it - BEFORE the 2024 elections you would have known these wars would continue and others would be started - just as they now have been - regardless of who won.
These people ignoring continuity of agenda and doing "analysis-by-official narrative" or "analysis-by-political party" are constantly wrong precisely because of this.
They are the same ones who said Trump would end all these wars in the first place (simply because he "said" so) or that Iran "won" and the US would leave West Asia (because the Western media suggested it), and are still looking for reasons to explain US policy in terms of "Trump," his "emotions," and the circus performed by him and those around him and even those "opposing" him.
And because they are doing this - they will continue to be wrong.
Truth is arrived at through first principles and scientific analysis and an understanding of material reality.
Like a math problem, if you don't get it right from the very start - everything you do onward will drift further and further from the right answer.
Go back to the beginning and start over until it all actually adds up.
🇺🇸 The US NED Has Only Grown Since Trump's Fake "Defunding" Stunt
▪️Not only did the Trump administration not "defund" or "dismantle" the US National Endowment for Democracy or USAID - it has dumped more money into both while simply hiding both better from what had been growing public awareness;
▪️The NED has published its 2025 annual report (here: https://t.co/Lyb2XkhuxN) meaning it continued undermining nations worldwide and advancing regime change in targeted nations AFTER Trump claimed to defund/dismantle it;
▪️The NED under Trump has continued to spend money to consolidate control over US-captured nations like Syria while quietly flooding money into so-called "independent media;"
▪️As warned, the Trump administration not only wasn't going to stop the course of US continuity of agenda, it has only accelerated it while deliberately lying, claiming and posing to do the opposite;
▪️Among the US-backed protests mentioned - include verification of US involvement in Nepal, Bangladesh, and Sri Lanka - all surrounding India for obvious reasons - Thailand was also mentioned as targeted ahead of elections that thankfully did not go Washington's way (so far);
@Gerashchenko_en Doesn't matter. The war in Ukraine is directed by neither of these men, nor Ukraine's government or military - all of which are tools used by the US. This drama is meant to manage public perception as Ukraine is pushed deep inside the wood-chipper of proxy war.
🇺🇸🇷🇺NEW ARTICLE: The Ukraine War is a US war on Russia
(NOTE: Because Elon Musk's X continues censoring content together with the State Department, NEO articles are unavailable on the platform, therefore the entire article is reprinted below).
As the Western media continues shaping narratives depicting a growing divide between the US and Europe regarding the ongoing conflict in Ukraine - a narrative involving an increasingly disinterested and disengaging US with an increasingly desperate and confrontational Europe - it is important to remember precisely how this war was started and why, as well as the material reality shaping its continuation.
By doing so, it is revealed the only "division" taking place between the US and Europe is a “division of labor,” a phrase literally spoken by the US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth in Brussels in February 2025 delegating the continuation of what is a US proxy war on Russia to Europe while the US redirects resources toward Asia.
Precisely because the war in Ukraine is a US proxy war on Russia, and the fact that Ukraine’s trained military manpower and territory continue to contract under the pressure of Russia’s strategy of attrition, to continue the war will require introducing additional pools of trained military manpower - and to extend Russia further - to do so along a wider front.
The military build-up of the Baltic states appears to be at a minimum an attempt to fix Russian forces along their border with Russia. The worst case scenario for Moscow would be for the US to repeat with its Baltic state proxies what it has already done in 2008 with its Georgian proxies and what it has done from 2011 onward with its Ukrainian proxies - attack Russia and its allies militarily, precipitating wider war along a wider front.
Western European nations, including the so-called “coalition of the willing,” led by France, Germany, and the United Kingdom, have implemented Secretary Hegseth’s directives from February 2025 enthusiastically - directives including to “double down” on arming Ukraine, “spending more on defense,” and convincing the European public of the “threat facing Europe” (meaning Russia).
With this in mind, it is clear there is not only no split of any kind between the US and its European proxies, Washington’s European proxies have demonstrated unflinching servile obedience even at the cost of placing themselves on the precipice of war with neighboring nuclear-armed Russia themselves.
The Larger, Long-Engineered War on Russia
Surrounding Russia with a number of geopolitical and economic crises to “extend Russia” with the hope of eventually precipitating a Soviet Union-style collapse, is the subject of numerous US policy papers spanning the entirety of the post-Cold War period.
There is even a paper published by the RAND Corporation literally titled, “Extending Russia,” listing a number of measures the US has since implemented verbatim before and since its publication in 2019.
The paper lays out the economic and geopolitical measures the US has since used to both prepare the grounds for this current proxy war, and to both perpetuate and expand it over time.
These measures include targeting Russia’s energy exports including specifically targeting pipeline expansion (Nord Stream, since destroyed by the US), the imposition of sanctions on Russia, the destabilization, destruction and/or the political capture of Russia’s allies both along its borders and beyond (including Ukraine, Georgia, Belarus, and Armenia, as well as Syria), and the arming of Ukraine itself following its political capture by Washington in 2014.
This latter measure, the RAND paper admits, would inevitably invite in wider conflict with Russia - and it did. The paper also admitted the measure would likely end in “disproportionately large Ukrainian casualties, territorial losses, and refugee flows,” and that, “it might even lead Ukraine into a disadvantageous peace.”
The purpose of US policy is not to necessarily “defeat” Russia in Ukraine, or in Georgia, or Armenia, Syria, or in any other particular region - but to create a multitude of crises mounting ever increasing pressure on Russia to create cracks and collapse wherever opportunities allow, and eventually precipitate overall collapse following pressure along a large and growing collection of fronts.
And this is precisely what the US is doing.
It doesn’t matter that Ukraine can’t win the current US proxy war against Russia - or that Europe collectively might not be able to either. US objectives are to create a growing conflict that eventually outpaces Russia’s ability to respond and defend itself against.
Similar strategies have been used against other targets of US “regime change” including Libya, Syria, and Iraq spanning decades before finally and fully succeeding.
Thus, the measure of Russia’s success is not simply on the battlefield in Ukraine, but its success or failure in defending itself against this much wider campaign of US-driven encroachment - a campaign that has transcended all US presidential administrations since the end of the Cold War without exception and will continue to do so into the foreseeable future.
The Growing Drone & Missile War
Growing attention has been placed on the steadily expanding drone and missile campaign targeting Russia deep within its territory. While proponents of Ukraine claim the strikes have “turned the tide” in Ukraine’s favor, and Russian proponents claim the attacks have had no impact at all - the truth is likely somewhere in between and subject to shift as both sides adapt. .
The Western media has already admitted “Ukraine’s” deep strikes into Russia using both US and European-manufactured missiles and drones are actually the product of the US intelligence community and the US military.
In late 2025 the New York Times would admit, “the Central Intelligence Agency and the U.S. military, with [US President Donald Trump’s ] blessing, supercharged a Ukrainian campaign of drone strikes on Russian oil facilities and tankers.”
More recently, the Financial Times would explain:
"Analysts attribute the growing success of Ukraine’s drone campaign to its ability to significantly increase production, as well as improved management.
American intelligence assistance has also played a role, aiding Kyiv in charting the best paths for its drones and helping to skirt air defences, senior Ukrainian officials told the FT."
Of course, Ukraine’s “ability to significantly increase production” actually translates into expanded production by both the US and Europe who then simply transfer components, kits, or entirely assembled drones to Ukraine for storage and use.
This includes the US-made artificial intelligence (AI) driven “Hornet” drones - a result of former Google CEO Eric Schmidt’s AI drone campaign announced at least 2 years ago.
These US-made and directed drones are carrying out a large-scale region-wide campaign of strikes on Russian maritime shipping in the Sea of Azov, the Black Sea, the Mediterranean Sea and beyond, as well as military, civilian, and energy production infrastructure at further and further ranges from the Russian-Ukrainian border deep inside Russian territory.
While the damage inflicted by these attacks has not matched Russia’s missile, guided bomb, drone, and guided rocket attacks on Ukraine, it is admittedly causing disruptions even according to the Russian government itself, especially for specific regions like Crimea and logistical routes leading into it.
Remembering that Washington’s goal with its war in Ukraine on Russia and its wider campaign of encroachment is meant to “extend,” not “defeat” Russia, it cannot be denied that the US strategy has significantly raised the costs of an already expensive war forced onto Russia.
The US and its European proxies will likely never match Russia in military industrial production, but given enough time, it will certainly continue to expand its ability to inflict greater and greater costs unless and until Russia is able to fully and finally end the war in Ukraine on the battlefield.
With the prospect of Ukraine collapsing and the war ending - the temptation for the US to open up additional fronts along Russia’s borders will increase - with preparations seemingly already underway for just such a front in at least the Baltic states.
Wider War on Multipolarism
As the US continues escalating its war on Russia in Ukraine - threatening to expand it even further across the rest of Europe - the US also continues its direct war of aggression against Iran - together precipitating a widening, global energy crisis aimed directly at China itself.
Meanwhile, the United States continues shaping the Asia-Pacific region in precisely the way it shaped and transformed Europe vis-a-vis Russia and West Asia vis-a-vis Iran - for large-scale war and/or proxy war with China.
The US is in the process of transforming the Philippines in Southeast Asia into the Asia-Pacific’s “Ukraine,” while integrating the military capabilities of South Korea, Japan, and the Philippines under a single interoperable US military command.
Just as the US has utilized drone attacks on Russia laundered through “Ukraine,” the US is likewise preparing the Philippines and the Chinese island province of Taiwan as launching points for similar attacks on China.
Understanding the wider, global nature of US foreign policy the US proxy war on Russia fits into helps explain the growing degree of cooperation between the primary targets of this US foreign policy - notably Russia, China, and Iran. Understanding that the US is advancing this policy by not only directly targeting these three nations, but also targeting third-parties - undermining, politically capturing, and using them as proxies to advance this policy - helps highlight the imperative of creating a global effort to expose and defend against this threat the US pursuit of primacy poses.
This threat is not only of a military and economic dimension, but also targets information, education, and political space.
Centuries ago - securing only one’s castle against a siege gives an enemy access to all the space and resources surrounding that castle - creating dynamics of attrition that favor the enemy over time no matter how well-protected the castle itself is. A besieged castle that creates strategic depth far beyond the walls of the castle, enabling it to attack and deny an enemy the ability to approach let alone begin the siege, increases the odds of victory in the long-term.
Today, the multipolar world needs to improve its strategic depth as much as individual nations need to fortify their borders against US encroachment, aggression, infiltration, destabilization, and political capture or collapse. This must be done not only through the traditional domains of national and global security, but also by focusing on information space - a domain as important to protect in the 21st century as one’s airspace, land borders, and shores.
Integrating this policy not only nationally, but across the emerging multipolar world in a collective manner helps create the strategic depth required in the 21st century to frustrate and defeat aggression today as strategic depth has done in past centuries.
Only time will tell whether or not Russia’s advantages amid the US proxy war in Ukraine can be extended successfully to the much wider campaign of encroachment the US is pursuing against Moscow - and whether Russia, Iran, and China can combine their efforts sufficiently enough to frustrate and defeat Washington’s global campaign of encroachment and aggression it is subjecting the rest of the world to.
Brian Berletic is a Bangkok-based geopolitical researcher and writer.
![BrianJBerletic's tweet photo. 🇺🇸🇷🇺NEW ARTICLE: The Ukraine War is a US war on Russia
(NOTE: Because Elon Musk's X continues censoring content together with the State Department, NEO articles are unavailable on the platform, therefore the entire article is reprinted below).
As the Western media continues shaping narratives depicting a growing divide between the US and Europe regarding the ongoing conflict in Ukraine - a narrative involving an increasingly disinterested and disengaging US with an increasingly desperate and confrontational Europe - it is important to remember precisely how this war was started and why, as well as the material reality shaping its continuation.
By doing so, it is revealed the only "division" taking place between the US and Europe is a “division of labor,” a phrase literally spoken by the US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth in Brussels in February 2025 delegating the continuation of what is a US proxy war on Russia to Europe while the US redirects resources toward Asia.
Precisely because the war in Ukraine is a US proxy war on Russia, and the fact that Ukraine’s trained military manpower and territory continue to contract under the pressure of Russia’s strategy of attrition, to continue the war will require introducing additional pools of trained military manpower - and to extend Russia further - to do so along a wider front.
The military build-up of the Baltic states appears to be at a minimum an attempt to fix Russian forces along their border with Russia. The worst case scenario for Moscow would be for the US to repeat with its Baltic state proxies what it has already done in 2008 with its Georgian proxies and what it has done from 2011 onward with its Ukrainian proxies - attack Russia and its allies militarily, precipitating wider war along a wider front.
Western European nations, including the so-called “coalition of the willing,” led by France, Germany, and the United Kingdom, have implemented Secretary Hegseth’s directives from February 2025 enthusiastically - directives including to “double down” on arming Ukraine, “spending more on defense,” and convincing the European public of the “threat facing Europe” (meaning Russia).
With this in mind, it is clear there is not only no split of any kind between the US and its European proxies, Washington’s European proxies have demonstrated unflinching servile obedience even at the cost of placing themselves on the precipice of war with neighboring nuclear-armed Russia themselves.
The Larger, Long-Engineered War on Russia
Surrounding Russia with a number of geopolitical and economic crises to “extend Russia” with the hope of eventually precipitating a Soviet Union-style collapse, is the subject of numerous US policy papers spanning the entirety of the post-Cold War period.
There is even a paper published by the RAND Corporation literally titled, “Extending Russia,” listing a number of measures the US has since implemented verbatim before and since its publication in 2019.
The paper lays out the economic and geopolitical measures the US has since used to both prepare the grounds for this current proxy war, and to both perpetuate and expand it over time.
These measures include targeting Russia’s energy exports including specifically targeting pipeline expansion (Nord Stream, since destroyed by the US), the imposition of sanctions on Russia, the destabilization, destruction and/or the political capture of Russia’s allies both along its borders and beyond (including Ukraine, Georgia, Belarus, and Armenia, as well as Syria), and the arming of Ukraine itself following its political capture by Washington in 2014.
This latter measure, the RAND paper admits, would inevitably invite in wider conflict with Russia - and it did. The paper also admitted the measure would likely end in “disproportionately large Ukrainian casualties, territorial losses, and refugee flows,” and that, “it might even lead Ukraine into a disadvantageous peace.”
The purpose of US policy is not to necessarily “defeat” Russia in Ukraine, or in Georgia, or Armenia, Syria, or in any other particular region - but to create a multitude of crises mounting ever increasing pressure on Russia to create cracks and collapse wherever opportunities allow, and eventually precipitate overall collapse following pressure along a large and growing collection of fronts.
And this is precisely what the US is doing.
It doesn’t matter that Ukraine can’t win the current US proxy war against Russia - or that Europe collectively might not be able to either. US objectives are to create a growing conflict that eventually outpaces Russia’s ability to respond and defend itself against.
Similar strategies have been used against other targets of US “regime change” including Libya, Syria, and Iraq spanning decades before finally and fully succeeding.
Thus, the measure of Russia’s success is not simply on the battlefield in Ukraine, but its success or failure in defending itself against this much wider campaign of US-driven encroachment - a campaign that has transcended all US presidential administrations since the end of the Cold War without exception and will continue to do so into the foreseeable future.
The Growing Drone & Missile War
Growing attention has been placed on the steadily expanding drone and missile campaign targeting Russia deep within its territory. While proponents of Ukraine claim the strikes have “turned the tide” in Ukraine’s favor, and Russian proponents claim the attacks have had no impact at all - the truth is likely somewhere in between and subject to shift as both sides adapt. .
The Western media has already admitted “Ukraine’s” deep strikes into Russia using both US and European-manufactured missiles and drones are actually the product of the US intelligence community and the US military.
In late 2025 the New York Times would admit, “the Central Intelligence Agency and the U.S. military, with [US President Donald Trump’s ] blessing, supercharged a Ukrainian campaign of drone strikes on Russian oil facilities and tankers.”
More recently, the Financial Times would explain:
"Analysts attribute the growing success of Ukraine’s drone campaign to its ability to significantly increase production, as well as improved management.
American intelligence assistance has also played a role, aiding Kyiv in charting the best paths for its drones and helping to skirt air defences, senior Ukrainian officials told the FT."
Of course, Ukraine’s “ability to significantly increase production” actually translates into expanded production by both the US and Europe who then simply transfer components, kits, or entirely assembled drones to Ukraine for storage and use.
This includes the US-made artificial intelligence (AI) driven “Hornet” drones - a result of former Google CEO Eric Schmidt’s AI drone campaign announced at least 2 years ago.
These US-made and directed drones are carrying out a large-scale region-wide campaign of strikes on Russian maritime shipping in the Sea of Azov, the Black Sea, the Mediterranean Sea and beyond, as well as military, civilian, and energy production infrastructure at further and further ranges from the Russian-Ukrainian border deep inside Russian territory.
While the damage inflicted by these attacks has not matched Russia’s missile, guided bomb, drone, and guided rocket attacks on Ukraine, it is admittedly causing disruptions even according to the Russian government itself, especially for specific regions like Crimea and logistical routes leading into it.
Remembering that Washington’s goal with its war in Ukraine on Russia and its wider campaign of encroachment is meant to “extend,” not “defeat” Russia, it cannot be denied that the US strategy has significantly raised the costs of an already expensive war forced onto Russia.
The US and its European proxies will likely never match Russia in military industrial production, but given enough time, it will certainly continue to expand its ability to inflict greater and greater costs unless and until Russia is able to fully and finally end the war in Ukraine on the battlefield.
With the prospect of Ukraine collapsing and the war ending - the temptation for the US to open up additional fronts along Russia’s borders will increase - with preparations seemingly already underway for just such a front in at least the Baltic states.
Wider War on Multipolarism
As the US continues escalating its war on Russia in Ukraine - threatening to expand it even further across the rest of Europe - the US also continues its direct war of aggression against Iran - together precipitating a widening, global energy crisis aimed directly at China itself.
Meanwhile, the United States continues shaping the Asia-Pacific region in precisely the way it shaped and transformed Europe vis-a-vis Russia and West Asia vis-a-vis Iran - for large-scale war and/or proxy war with China.
The US is in the process of transforming the Philippines in Southeast Asia into the Asia-Pacific’s “Ukraine,” while integrating the military capabilities of South Korea, Japan, and the Philippines under a single interoperable US military command.
Just as the US has utilized drone attacks on Russia laundered through “Ukraine,” the US is likewise preparing the Philippines and the Chinese island province of Taiwan as launching points for similar attacks on China.
Understanding the wider, global nature of US foreign policy the US proxy war on Russia fits into helps explain the growing degree of cooperation between the primary targets of this US foreign policy - notably Russia, China, and Iran. Understanding that the US is advancing this policy by not only directly targeting these three nations, but also targeting third-parties - undermining, politically capturing, and using them as proxies to advance this policy - helps highlight the imperative of creating a global effort to expose and defend against this threat the US pursuit of primacy poses.
This threat is not only of a military and economic dimension, but also targets information, education, and political space.
Centuries ago - securing only one’s castle against a siege gives an enemy access to all the space and resources surrounding that castle - creating dynamics of attrition that favor the enemy over time no matter how well-protected the castle itself is. A besieged castle that creates strategic depth far beyond the walls of the castle, enabling it to attack and deny an enemy the ability to approach let alone begin the siege, increases the odds of victory in the long-term.
Today, the multipolar world needs to improve its strategic depth as much as individual nations need to fortify their borders against US encroachment, aggression, infiltration, destabilization, and political capture or collapse. This must be done not only through the traditional domains of national and global security, but also by focusing on information space - a domain as important to protect in the 21st century as one’s airspace, land borders, and shores.
Integrating this policy not only nationally, but across the emerging multipolar world in a collective manner helps create the strategic depth required in the 21st century to frustrate and defeat aggression today as strategic depth has done in past centuries.
Only time will tell whether or not Russia’s advantages amid the US proxy war in Ukraine can be extended successfully to the much wider campaign of encroachment the US is pursuing against Moscow - and whether Russia, Iran, and China can combine their efforts sufficiently enough to frustrate and defeat Washington’s global campaign of encroachment and aggression it is subjecting the rest of the world to.
Brian Berletic is a Bangkok-based geopolitical researcher and writer.](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HNZ2_n8aQAAs9xK.jpg)
🇺🇸/IRAN - NEW VIDEO: The US War on Iran Continues & Why It Was Never Going to Stop
How to Support my Work (and thank you):
Buy Me A Coffee: https://t.co/30qZRYcAlU
Patreon: https://t.co/jtPZKYrols
Follow The New Atlas on Telegram: https://t.co/fjz2fvDY5G
why is it a national security priority? What danger does China actually pose to the US?
Or is it just that you want to pose a danger to China and you don't want China to have any leverage or ability to protect itself when you do - like in the "good ole days" when US troops marched in the streets of Chinese cities???
Between China and the US - the US has been at constant war around the globe at the expense of American lives and tax dollars this entire 21st century, while China has been at war with NOBODY.
Who is the real danger to Americans here? China? Or liars in Washington (like you) selling these wars?
@nnseva @Ulianalive Ты можешь устроить майдан, только если его профинансирует и даст отмашку американский хозяин. Никак иначе.
🇺🇸🇨🇳The US is Waging a GLOBAL Dirty War on China Already...
NEW VIDEO: Washington's Dirty War on China: From Pakistan & Iran to Afghanistan & Myanmar
How to Support my Work (and thank you):
Buy Me A Coffee: https://t.co/30qZRYcAlU
Patreon: https://t.co/jtPZKYrols
Follow The New Atlas on Telegram: https://t.co/fjz2fvDY5G
US-Iran "Negotiations"
I warned that the US objective is not necessarily toppling Iran immediately, and certainly not stopping "nuclear weapons" that don't even exist - but to cut China and the rest of Asia off from not just Iranian oil, but all energy exports from the Middle East.
To maintain the slow but sure strangulation of energy exports from the entire region, the US has triggered a war damaging energy production and export infrastructure across the whole region, then placed its own blockade on Iranian ports and any other shipping it decides to interdict, as well as carrying out sporadic attacks even while "negotiating" with Iran.
The goal is to maintain this strangle hold, increase it when necessary, perform political circus when it needs to cool markets - all while creating the economic crisis it requires to isolate China and force Asian states under a greater degree of US energy dependence.
This is exactly what the US just spent the last 12 years doing with Russia regarding Ukraine - pretending to "negotiate" while constantly escalating.
This is exactly what the US has spent the last 47 years doing with China regarding Taiwan - pretending to "negotiate" while constantly escalating.
@GLandsbergis Send in the hardened NAFO twitter clowns brigade, that should help
@XisElonGated @OK3_141592 @WarMonitors Are you still winning, tactically insightful pleb? Looks like you've got bigger problems now xD
@SecGenNATO You look so happy tho
@rshereme Those washing machine chips are pretty powerful tho!
@kurgan3909 @charliegreenman @ZelenskyyUa Lmao you are litterally talking about harneded NAFO twitter clowns brigade
@MyLordBebo Dang, that's good. Not yet, but soon
Ursula Von der Leyen drives home after work … looking at the mighty Europe she created
@jurgen_nauditt Obsessed Nazi punk sees Putin in his dreams every night
@Tatarigami_UA The puppet got too full of itself. The masters yanked the leash.
Last Seen Users on Sotwe
TÜRK İFŞA TUBE FRAGMAN
Seen from Turkey
العراقي ابن ديالى 🇮🇶
Seen from France
BossK
Seen from Vietnam
Aydın Doğan
Seen from Turkey
đai ca
Seen from Vietnam
TÜRK GÜZELLERİ
Seen from Turkey
Eş Paylaşım Sayfası (Gizlilik Esastır)
Seen from Turkey
Tgd9508
Seen from Malaysia
pemulahehe
Seen from Malaysia
Desi bull hunk
Seen from Pakistan
Most Popular Users
Elon Musk 
@elonmusk
241.5M followers
Barack Obama
@barackobama
119M followers
Cristiano Ronaldo
@cristiano
113.8M followers
Donald J. Trump
@realdonaldtrump
111.8M followers
Narendra Modi
@narendramodi
107.2M followers
Rihanna
@rihanna
98.6M followers
NASA
@nasa
92.4M followers
Justin Bieber
@justinbieber
91.7M followers
KATY PERRY
@katyperry
89.7M followers
Taylor Swift
@taylorswift13
83.6M followers
Lady Gaga
@ladygaga
75.1M followers
Virat Kohli
@imvkohli
72.8M followers
Kim Kardashian
@kimkardashian
70.7M followers
YouTube
@youtube
68.8M followers
Neymar Jr
@neymarjr
65.8M followers
Bill Gates
@billgates
64.9M followers
Selena Gomez
@selenagomez
62.7M followers
The Ellen Show
@theellenshow
62.3M followers
CNN
@cnn
61.8M followers
X
@x
60.7M followers