Tahimik ang mga majority senators sa pagsampa ng ibaβt ibang kaso laban sa kapwa nila senador sa minority, lumalabas tuloy na parang complicit sila, wala man lang pahayag ng pagkabahala.
Of course, the VP is always expected to be prepared and ready to assume the presidency should it become vacant. Thatβs the nature of her job in ensuring continuity of government.
Bakit kailangan pang mga dayuhan ang humusga sa kapwa natin Pilipino, gayong may sarili naman tayong batas, hukuman, at mga institusyon? Kung may kakayahan tayong magpatupad ng katarungan sa sarili nating bayan, bakit natin ito ipinaubaya sa iba?
Gawaing makapili!
The question now is which of the amici curiae is most credible. We know that even former justices can have political and personal biases that may influence their views.
It simply means that if a senator was unable to participate for whatever reason, that senator may cast a vote of abstention, but should not thereby be deprived of the right to vote.
In determining the voting threshold, make sure you do not effectively deprive senators of their right to vote simply because they are absent, especially when their absence may not be of their own choosing.
The amici curiae hearing was supposed to resolve the number of votes needed to convict. Instead, the four retired justices offered different schools of thought. The situation has become more confusing.
It should have been a simple linear form.
To get y = (2/3)x, you must define the variable x properly first.
The dispute is the factor (not denominator) x.