Vy

[Vy @vySoSerious]

AI should not have a personality of its own.

Studies have observed that AI seems to exert a gravitational pull on people’s opinions. Make it centrist, users move toward the center, make it right-leaning, they drift right etc.

That influence should not be hidden behind “personality” or branded as “maximum truth-seeking.”

[Vy @vySoSerious]

@strangeliu That's what I'm saying! It was a pretty ingenious design if you ask me.

[Vy @vySoSerious]

@app_settings So between max clear and default you’re just changing the blurriness?

[Vy @vySoSerious]

@stephancasas There doesn’t happen to be a setting for the corner radius as well?

[Vy @vySoSerious]

@stephancasas THANK GOD

[Vy @vySoSerious]

I second this, it’s just not efficient for 90% of tasks an average dev faces. Composer 2.5 already is plenty a lot of the time.

[Ananth @Ananth7e]

Fable 5 High is not that great compared to GPT-5.5 (xhigh)

Claude Fable 5 sits at 70.6 on the cursor leaderboard while GPT-5.5 extra high at 64.3%.

GPT-5.5(xhigh) produces similar results for 1/4th the cost, consuming 1/4th the tokens and requiring half the steps as Fable 5.

GPT-5.6 is well in line to beat Fable 5

[Vy @vySoSerious]

@theo Ask Fable to make a second account for you.

[Vy @vySoSerious]

@haider1 Seems to be *a tad* better than Opus 4.8 🤔

[Vy @vySoSerious]

@wdormann @DylanMcD8 No, they didn’t. It seems that they just went back to the old corner radius for all Swift(?) apps.

[Vy @vySoSerious]

@DylanMcD8 macOS 26, though rushed and lacking in usability, was a work of art. Going back to the old design is clearly the wrong move in my opinion.
They should keep building on it instead of just giving up.

[Jake Go @_notnotjake]

Cannot believe they brought back opaque toolbars. wtf these are so ancient. I liked the blur!!

[Vy @vySoSerious]

@iupdate Not impressed. This is basically slightly smarter spotlight.

[Vy @vySoSerious]

@Cartidise @DylanMcD8 It’s basically just the old design, which was one of the apects I liked the least about iOS 18.

[Vy @vySoSerious]

@DylanMcD8 They did macOS even dirtier. -__-

[Vy @vySoSerious]

That doesn’t align with my experience of vibe coding at all.

I feel like I’ve become significantly more efficient and much better at making informed decisions. At the same time, the quality of my code has improved drastically, despite already being fairly strong for a junior developer.

Learning feels easier and faster than ever. I’ve never felt as consistently motivated by programming or as excited to learn as I do now.

[Vy @vySoSerious]

@Bulvarpress Your kid will notice, eventually. Don’t deceive your child like that.

[Theo - t3.gg @theo]

I am thankful that OpenAI trained their models to be helpful assistants

[Vy @vySoSerious]

I mean, this type of scenario became kinda inevitable the moment execs started replacing workers with AI.

What I don’t see enough people talking about is the way automation might make basic necessities like food, water, power, and housing essentially free.

At that point, the economy would shift away from basic survival and toward self-actualization. Kind of like the future Star Trek imagined.

Our capitalist system is probably screwed, but humanity is gonna be just fine.

At least until AI wipes us out.

[Vy @vySoSerious]

When vibe coding, you just need to stay involved in the loop enough to actually care about the result. That way, you can still understand what’s going on even though you’re not writing the code yourself.

How deep you go should depend on the problem you’re working on.

For isolated code, like small UI components, you can still fully vibe code without worrying too much. What you should stay in control of is the underlying architecture.

[Wise @trikcode]

A person deleted 3 months of AI generated code because he could not understand it.

He could not explain why it was written that way.

[Vy @vySoSerious]

@RespectfulMemes Time to start sleepmaxxing. 😴