w.xyz

[w.xyz @w_persona]

記錄
道業未成時 何其兩不宜 事煩心緒亂 飜作徘徊思
年乖數亦孤 久病未能蘇 岸危舟未發 龍卧失明珠
舊用多成破 新更始具財 改求雲外望 枯木遇春開
殘月未還光 樽前非語傷 户中有人厄 祈福保青陽
一信向天飛 秦川舟自歸 前途成好事 應得貴人推
明月暗雲浮 花紅一半枯 惹事傷心處 行舟莫遠圖

[w.xyz @w_persona]

其中一條評論「一家只收購空殼公司的空殼公司」

[jeansㅣFREE NEWJEANS @jeans0722sweet]

3년 전 500억 들여 인수한 수퍼톤
年154억 손실에 사업 시너지 없어
美홍보대행사 1년 만에 처분 이어
1.5조 투자한 이타카도 적자 급증
美법인 손상차손만 2796억 달해
https://t.co/mnxhzujNxq

[PoppyKPoppie @PoppyKPoppie]

letting fear of a big company stop you from boycotting is a mindset. tiny voices, when combined, makes the loudest noise. 💕

[w.xyz @w_persona]

@zumilan07 @A_MaizingBlue No. The judge required ADOR to state a clear damages figure along with its basis. Since ADOR filed a lawsuit for damages, but couldn't even name a specific number and just wanted to package it all together to trap Dani in litigation—the judge saw right through that long ago.

[eda @pomusana]

ador is being criticized for their uncreative work and directors are calling it outdated. if you compare what fraudor has released with what was planned for njz, it's obvious that newjeans were prepared to enter a whole new chapter meanwhile ador is still recycling old concepts

[1tokki @juantokki]

Let’s talk.

NewJeans wasn’t successful simply because they were under HYBE. They became successful because of two things: the five members and Min Hee-jin.

Minji, Hanni, Danielle, Haerin, and Hyein are the heart of NewJeans. Min Hee-jin was the creative force that gave the group its identity. Remove either, and it stops being NewJeans. It becomes something else entirely.

NewJeans was never a formula that could be copied, packaged, and replicated. Their identity came from a rare combination of five distinct personalities and a creative vision that made them feel authentic, relatable, and impossible to manufacture.

Throughout this entire conflict, the only party that truly came out ahead was HYBE. They may have secured control over NewJeans, but they never understood what made NewJeans NewJeans. And they never will.

To understand why NewJeans resonated with millions of people, you have to see the members as human beings first… not as assets, not as IP, not as products. That’s something HYBE has consistently failed to do. You cannot claim you’re preserving NewJeans while stripping away everything that gave the group its soul.

Some people will convince themselves that NewJeans is “coming back.” But what they’ll be getting is HYBE’s version of NewJeans, not necessarily the NewJeans that so many people fell in love with.

Yes, you may still see four of the five members on stage. But their circumstances won’t be the same. Their freedom won’t be the same. The way they’re allowed to express themselves won’t be the same. The music, the way they communicate with Bunnies, and the authenticity that defined the group won’t be the same.

What you’ll be watching is a carefully manufactured version of NewJeans… something designed to resemble NewJeans while missing the very essence that made them special. HYBE will package it as the comeback everyone has been waiting for and hope people accept it without question, because that’s all they need: for enough people to buy into the illusion while the members remain under their control for as long as they’re useful.

NewJeans will always be five.

Minji. Hanni. Danielle. Haerin. Hyein.

That… or nothing.

[Kuma @kumachan982]

出道专是美高女孩风。
第二张EP立即进入东亚青涩期。
第三张是轻盈的青春期五味杂陈。
第四张是成长遇到痛苦的决然离开和洒脱。
闵熙珍手里的newjeans一直在成长。
很多kpop粉丝希望自己的偶像一旦在一个路线上爆红就重复几次吃够红利。
newjeans不是这样的。
所以这个四人版的预告很糟糕。

[Hanei @haannieee77]

All NewJeans content without Danielle must be boycotted. That's what's helpful to HH. If you enjoy and take pleasure in it just as that company wants, HH will be dragged around by that company forever. If you want HH's happiness, boycott it. Boycott and do not consume everything

[☆ @phambratz]

oh newjeans you’re so loved.

[えっこ🌿✨ @w_in_w_in_1118]

🏢のガールズグループに何かある度にNewJeansがあの時に声を上げていなければ、表に出せない場所で理由もわからずに終わらせられていただろうなと思うばかり。あの時に声を上げてくれて良かったね。
もしあれがなければその時にいるメンバーいらないメンバーと向こうが判断してわけていたらその時から表向きに分裂させられていたし。
元々チームだから結束も強くて5人はいつも5人でNewJeans、バニズと私たちの仲を裂ける人は誰もいないと表立って何度も何度も言っていたのも、引き裂こうとする人がいたから。いまもそれは変わらない、もう何か簡単に言える場所にいないだけ。ダニエルの言葉とミンジの手紙を信じていたらいい

[w.xyz @w_persona]

No. She didn't say that. It's about a plan involving Japan, not the boy group.
Pls don't spread misinformation.
https://t.co/2te1LfmSTc

[Pop EMPIRE @PopEmpirex]

Former ADOR CEO & NewJeans Executive Producer Min Hee-jin set to Announce New Boy Group in 2 months.

The Lineup and debut date have not been finalized yet.

[jurídico hanni pham @lontrapham]

Essa é a parte que mais mostra a diferença entre as duas músicas.Mesmo tendo alguns trechos com “Exact Match with 1/4 note Shift”, dá pra ver claramente que o desenvolvimento da melodia segue rumos diferentes. As notas verdes em cima não aparecem na de baixo, e os intervalos também mudam em vários pontos. Além disso, o deslocamento rítmico altera completamente o groove e a sensação da frase.I sso reforça que ter algumas semelhanças não significa que as músicas são iguais. A forma como a melodia se desenvolve é o que realmente diferencia uma da outra.

[w.xyz @w_persona]

A tactic to shift the public focus from B** to NJ, which inadvertently makes one wonder if B**'s issues are actually more severe 🧐

[taly @talytokkiz]

At 12 AM on July 9, Billboard released an article about a copyright infringement lawsuit involving HYBE’s biggest boy group. Less than 24 hours later, Dispatch published another article about NewJeans, this time taking a deep dive into the copyright infringement lawsuit surrounding “How Sweet.”

So when is the deep dive into that boy group’s lawsuit going to drop? Or does Dispatch only publish these kinds of in-depth articles when it comes to NewJeans and Min Hee-jin?

The article also includes commentary that many readers may view as unnecessary, including references to I**IT and the plagiarism controversy surrounding them, direct quotes from the plaintiffs’ attorney, and discussion of Min Hee-jin’s past romantic relationship with one of the producers involved with the song.

Dispatch’s recent article doesn’t feel like a neutral deep dive to me. It feels more like an attempt to shift public attention back toward NewJeans.

[luna ୨ৎ @luenacore]

🚨 Fun fact: Both lawsuits for "ETA" and "How Sweet" show clear signs of a predatory legal strategy called "Copyright Trolling."

This is not a real fight about artistic integrity. It's a legal shakedown where companies weaponize the court system to scare big targets into paying a quick cash settlement out of court

Here is exactly how this "lawsuit factory" is targeting NewJeans:

1. The Copy-Paste Evidence: The two lawsuits are separate cases handled by different law firms. Yet, both court documents contain the exact same unique typo, spelling Minji's name as "KIN MIN-JI." This shows they were mass-produced using a shared boilerplate template.

2. Holding Apple and Coca-Cola Hostage: The plaintiffs intentionally sued NewJeans' biggest corporate partners, Apple and Coca-Cola. They know massive global brands hate bad press. By dragging them into court, they create instant corporate panic to pressure the label into paying a quick cash settlement to protect their advertising deals.

3. The Confirmation: Billboard officially confirmed that the company suing over ETA is the exact same entity that used this identical strategy to extract a quick cash settlement from the rapper Pitbull years ago. They also intentionally waited nearly two years for NewJeans' songs to make millions globally before launching this attack.

The most alarming detail in the Billboard report is that HYBE and ADOR did not respond to immediate requests for comment. By failing to answer, they left the international media completely unanswered, leaving the girls utterly defenseless, but this isn't suprising as the CEO of HYBE, Lee Jae-sang himself stated he intended to ruin the image/brand value of NewJeans.

[w.xyz @w_persona]

有時候，最大的矛盾並非對手說了什麼，而是你一年前自己說過的話。

[1tokki @juantokki]

So… Which Is It, ADOR?

One of many things that’s been bothering me about ADOR’s recent claims is that they can’t seem to keep their own story straight.

Back in April 2025, during the hearing of the exclusive contract validity lawsuit, ADOR made a very clear argument.

They told the court that NewJeans had successfully performed at ComplexCon Hong Kong without Min Hee-jin’s involvement, and that this proved she wasn’t indispensable.

In ADOR’s own words:

“The successful outcome of that performance suggests that Min is not the only one capable of producing for the group.”

The message couldn’t have been clearer. They are trying to frame that NewJeans did fine without Min.

That was their narrative that time.

Fast forward to July 2026, and suddenly we’re hearing something completely different.

Now the claim is that Min Hee-jin was actually behind almost everything.

According to reports summarizing ADOR’s court presentation, MHJ allegedly planned the ComplexCon performance, oversaw the NJZ profile shoot, directed the styling, participated in recording the new song, coordinated with organizers, and even stressed strict confidentiality throughout the preparations.

So… which is it?

Because those two stories don’t fit together.

If Min really directed all of those creative decisions, then why did ADOR spend 2025 arguing that ComplexCon proved NewJeans could succeed without her?

And if the April 2025 statement was true… that the performance was prepared without MHJ’s involvement… then why is ADOR now presenting her as the mastermind behind the entire project?

You can’t have it both ways.

This isn’t about whether MHJ actually participated. That’s ultimately something the court will determine based on evidence.

This is about ADOR’s messaging.

Notice how the story changes depending on what benefits them at the time. To me, that’s a really clear indication that they are lying.

When they wanted to argue that NewJeans didn’t need MHJ, she was suddenly irrelevant.

When they wanted to argue that she orchestrated unauthorized activities, she suddenly became involved in everything.

No consistency. That’s just some vile cold-hearted strategy.

And people who use their brains should have noticed that by now.

In any legal dispute, parties are naturally going to make arguments that favor their position. That’s expected. But credibility matters. Good faith matters. When your public narrative flips depending on what’s convenient, it raises a simple question: Are the facts changing? Or is the story changing?

That’s why I think it’s important not to get swept up in every headline. Instead, look at the timeline. Look at what was said before. Look at what’s being said now.

Sometimes the biggest contradiction isn’t what your opponent says. It’s what you said yourself a year earlier.

[w.xyz @w_persona]

@catzrinie 不管最後有沒有成功，應了那個原無意革命，最後卻走上跟革命無異的道路。

[shine @catzrinie]

Menurut pengacara danielle, selama lebih dari 15 tahun belum pernah ada agensi yg diselidiki sama KFTC (Komisi Perdagangan Korea) karena make kontrak standar hiburan yg dibuat pemerintah buat nuntut penalti ke artis sampeee sekarang

Kata gue newjeans lu beneran keren banget bisa bawa perubahan🥹

[. @f1hql6ci8yIzxl7]

No, they can't. That's why HYBE has no case. That's a private chat between parents and lawyers exploring possibilities, no members are in the chat, which is why they can't hold anyone accountable.

[w.xyz @w_persona]

就是你 HYBE/ADOR 惹火廣告主 OMEGA 了啊，現在被人嘲笑也不冤枉

[w.xyz @w_persona]

@kumachan982 雖然我真的很希望成真，但看看離29年也不遠了