I5 (HW5) is not coming to customer vehicles for FSD. Musk has clarified that AI5 chips are prioritized for Optimus humanoid robots and Tesla’s supercomputer clusters (Dojo training), not cars. Production has also been delayed to early 2027.
So from a vehicle perspective this is a nothing burger
MSTR isn’t “forced” into anything—it’s brilliantly engineering leverage to stack more #Bitcoin per common share while STRC holders happily collect that 11.5% yield in a world of trash fiat. No earnings? The software business throws off real cash, and the BTC treasury is the growth engine. This is capital structure innovation, not a Ponzi.
Meanwhile, you’ve been shilling gold as the ultimate store of value for decades… while Bitcoin has crushed it over 10+ years with 20,000%+ gains vs gold’s modest creep. Gold can’t be sent instantly across borders, can’t be verified on a global ledger in seconds, and sits in vaults collecting dust (or “trust me bro” paper claims).
BTC is digital property with perfect scarcity and portability. Your gold bags are just heavy rocks in a digital age. Keep yapping—Saylor’s building the future while you’re stuck in the 1970s.
#Bitcoin #MSTR
@PeterSchiff Gold is now in the end stage. It had its time and now the end is near. You don’t have much more time to rotate out of the analog to the digital of bitcoin.
Do you sell seminars on engagement too?ok, I’ll throw a quarter in your bucket. the Model Y depreciates faster than a Toyota RAV4 right now—but it’s a misleading half-picture. A gas car saves you nothing on fuel or maintenance and still loses big value. For the average driver, the Tesla Model Y’s $1,800–$2,500/year operating advantage more than offsets the depreciation difference, delivers a superior driving experience, and often results in lower total ownership cost over the life of the vehicle.
If you drive a lot, charge at home, and plan to keep it 5+ years (or buy used), the EV is the clear winner
Peter, even if BTC has 'no intrinsic value' alone, why are lenders now requiring borrowers to hold it in escrow as collateral for real estate loans? It gives them better protection than the property itself in many scenarios, because BTC's upside can cover downside risk on the brick-and-mortar asset you like. If it's truly worthless, this whole structure makes no sense—yet here it is in practice."
It doesn't "prove" BTC is better than gold, but it directly challenges the "zero value / pure Ponzi" claim by showing it's being integrated into productive, cash-flowing systems in ways gold isn't always required to be