This is exactly what I was talking about.
They trend tags for every minor health concern involving the other members, yet Jungkook's own update, where he mentioned his back pain, is largely ignored.
So how am I supposed to believe the "OT7" or "family" narrative when the concern doesn't seem to be shown equally?
@RollingStoneUK Dear @RollingStoneUK
In your BTS London concert review, the hyperlink on Jungkook's name is broken. He's the only member affected.
Also, his photo isn't shown in the article. It only appears at the end of the expanded gallery.
Could you please look into these issues? Thank you
Dear @RollingStoneUK
In your BTS London concert review, the hyperlink on Jungkook's name is broken. He's the only member affected.
Also, his photo isn't shown in the article. It only appears at the end of the expanded gallery.
Could you please look into these issues? Thank you
@JJK_Times@RollingStoneUK Dear @RollingStoneUK
In your BTS London concert review, the hyperlink on Jungkook's name is broken. He's the only member affected.
Also, his photo isn't shown in the article. It only appears at the end of the expanded gallery.
Could you please look into these issues? Thank you
I’m really glad Jungkook doesn’t need fandom-driven “records” or manufactured hype to prove anything. His talent, global impact, sold-out power, and real success are already recognized where it truly matters , by the actual industry, major markets, top brands, and global audiences.
Even with a noticeable lack of hype or promotion from HYBE, his own company, the recognition still comes naturally. Media, news outlets, and industry voices continue to highlight his influence, achievements, and power without needing constant push.
At the end of the day, Jungkook’s success speaks for itself , and the world keeps confirming it over and over again.
Jungkook's collaboration with Calvin Klein is the brand's most successful collaboration to date, generating unprecedented global demand, PVH Corp. confirms.
"Seven," a hit solo track by BTS member Jungkook, has surpassed 3 billion streams on Spotify, making him the first Korean artist to hit the threshold with a single song, his agency BigHit Music said Tuesday.
https://t.co/20B9L3LMGb
i don't care if you think "it's a joke" of "not that deep". i've said it forever; if you're going to talk about him, praise him or shut uppppp my godddddd
some of you need to watch your fucking mouth with the way you speak about jungkook and him exposing a twitter user in front of your eyes should tell you just enough
What some people still refuse to understand is that the hate toward Jungkook is always hidden behind a "joke." One person makes a shady post, others join with likes, comments, and more insults, then act like it's all harmless fun.
Let's be clear: disrespecting Jungkook is not a joke.
When the same people keep mocking him, dragging him, and making him the target, that's not humor. That's jealousy, bias, and hate hidden behind an ARMY mask.
Stop making excuses for it. Stop normalizing it. Calling it a joke doesn't make it okay.
If someone constantly disrespects Jungkook, unfollow them, block them, report them, and stop giving them attention.
Respect Jungkook.
Seven by Jungkook has now surpassed 3 Billion streams in Spotify. Jungkook is the first and only Asian act in history to achieve this huge milestone.
3 BILLION STREAMS FOR SEVEN
HISTORY MAKER JUNGKOOK
#Seven3Billion#Jungkook#정국
"Seven” by #JungKook has surpassed 3 BILLION streams on Spotify! It’s the most streamed song by an Asian Act in Spotify history! 💪��👑🖤💜
HISTORY MAKER JUNGKOOK
#SEVEN3BILLION
#JungKook_Seven
If this were another member, the fandom would already be in full panic mode: streaming parties everywhere, nonstop promotion, and everyone pushing for the milestone together.
But because it's Jungkook, Seven is being left to fight for 3 billion with far less support than it deserves.
And when it finally reaches 3 billion, many will celebrate and take credit for a record they did little to help achieve.
We are getting dangerously close now, but reaching 3 billion isn't enough. We need to keep daily streams high to cushion the impact of monthly filtering and avoid losing the milestone right after achieving it.
Please stream, support, and show up for Jungkook. Let's give him the effort, energy, and dedication he has always deserved. 💜
#SevenTo3Billions
I'm talking about this for the first time because, at first, I genuinely thought some people simply had an issue with those who support Taehyung and Jungkook together, or with the subunit name "Taekook" itself. I thought the problem was only with the name or banners. But now it's becoming more and more clear that this is selective activism.
I watched countless people create outrage over Taekook banners at concerts, calling them inappropriate and demanding that they be banned. Yet when it comes to other ships, especially Jik0ok-related projects, the same people suddenly go silent. Yesterday, I didn't see a single major OT7 account calling out Jik0ok banners with the same intensity. And now there are even posts asking BIGHIT to stop people from bringing TK banners into concerts.
Why?
If you're truly against shipping culture, then your standards should apply equally to every ship not only the ones you personally dislike.
How is it acceptable for fans to send gifts referencing Jik0ok to Jimin's father's café and call him the "Jikook president," but people aren't even allowed to put Taehyung and Jungkook's names together on a banner? They will attack everyone who support taehyung and Jungkook together
Jikook supporters are allowed to paint murals in city and organize large-scale projects, yet Taekook supporters can't even organize an exhibition without facing backlash. How is that fair? If the same standards are meant to apply to everyone, why others are attacked simply for holding a banner with two members' names?
Whether it's a Taekook banner, a Jikook banner, or any other pairing, the rules should be the same for everyone. Right..??
It's the inconsistency of this fandom who they often speaks about respecting boundaries, but those boundaries seem to be enforced selectively depending on which narrative is favored. That's not fairness. That's hypocrisy.
And before anyone says I'm only speaking because I'm a Taekook supporter: yes, I support Taehyung and Jungkook respectfully. I've supported them since 2016. You will never find me sexualizing them, invading their privacy, or spreading inappropriate content. Supporting a bond respectfully is completely different from crossing personal boundaries.
I've been in this fandom long enough to watch it change over the years. What disappoints me most is seeing people apply different standards depending on what benefits their side. If you're against shipping culture, be against all of it equally. If you support fan projects, support equal treatment for everyone. But picking and choosing based on personal preferences only exposes selective behavior.
Because if your principles only apply to people you disagree with, then they were never principles to begin with.
The irony is that you're opposing something Taehyung and Jungkook created and acknowledged themselves, while defending a name that was created entirely by the fandom. Funny how "respecting artists" suddenly becomes selective when it doesn't fit certain narratives.