@sean_campbell28@ArifHasanNFL The decision will not be based on his performance in GB without his starting quarterback lmao that is a wild take. The decision has likely already been made one way or another. Which was the point of my original tweet
@sean_campbell28@ArifHasanNFL Not saying it would, but it’s silly to think a coach would give up on his chances, however small they may be. If you’re in his position, would you willingly choose to punt on your job? Don’t think so.
@sean_campbell28@ArifHasanNFL The only way mond sees the field next week is if zim has been given an assurance he will be the HC next year. He wouldn’t decrease his chances of winning if his job is in jeopardy imo
@ArifHasanNFL Idk if him starting vs Green Bay spawns a decade long nfl career in which he plays gunner on punt it may be worth it. Food for thought arif
@ARoomWithAPoo@BigJones5577 @gamerdood57 @Vikings No chance you can put ARI, CIN, CLE, and possibly BAL on zim in my opinion, what happened in those games was essentially out of his control. Holding a team to 14 should be a win 99% of the time. We likely won’t agree but I respect the discussion.
@ARoomWithAPoo@BigJones5577 @gamerdood57 @Vikings I love Kirk and think he’s the main reason the vikes are even relevant this year, and half of the things mentioned aren’t even on the HC. Zim is pretty pretty pretty bad at time management. Won’t contest that point at all
@ARoomWithAPoo@BigJones5577 @gamerdood57 @Vikings Regardless of your feelings on the team, literally every game has been winnable this year. Some should have been blowouts but weren’t, but that doesn’t make them not “winnable”