icd

"I didn't do it. Nobody saw me do it. You can't prove anything." - Bart Simpson
@wan0net.42 on Signal

[icd @wan0net]

@UK_Daniel_Card Don't write your passwords down.

[icd @wan0net]

@printfJess I hope YOUR day was good.

[icd @wan0net]

@thebleucheese @SwiftOnSecurity And the fact you have this attitude is exemplify what Tay says.

[icd @wan0net]

@thebleucheese @SwiftOnSecurity There is, it’s called safety critical systems.

[icd @wan0net]

@hakluke I mean, I could have Kaspersky and know it's completely rooted, but still operable.

[icd @wan0net]

@tobycmurray Clear as mud. As expected.

[Scott Hanselman 🌮 @shanselman]

Here’s the thing folks. I’ve been coding 32 years. When something like this happens it��s an organizational failure. Yes, some human wrote a bad line. Someone can “git blame” and point to a human and it’s awful. But it’s the testing, the Cl/CD, the A/B testing, the metered rollouts, an oh shit button to roll it back, the code coverage, the static analysis tools, the code reviews, the organizational health, and on and on. It’s always one line of code but it’s NEVER one person. Implying inclusion policies caused a bug is simplistic, reductive, and racist. Engineering is a team sport. Inclusion makes for good teams. Good engineering practices makes for good software. Engineering practices failed to find a bug multiple times, regardless of the seniority of the human who checked that code in. Solving the larger system thinking SDLC matters more than the null pointer check. This isn’t a “git gud C++ is hard” issue and it damn well isn’t an DEI one.

[icd @wan0net]

@gregdotexe *muffled giggles*

[icd @wan0net]

@grandMa5ter @_sarahyo You’re Scottish until you win something then you’re British.

[icd @wan0net]

@rustla I’ll have to try.

[Scott Hanselman 🌮 @shanselman]

SET BLASTER=A220 I5 D1

[icd @wan0net]

@0xTib3rius I gave up on homebrewed nas and just bought a Synology.

[icd @wan0net]

@VolkisAU Yes you are @skorov8

[icd @wan0net]

@fancy_4n6 @fr0gger_ Mine regularly get attacked by a puppy who just wants to show he loves me, so I don’t have as many as I’d like.

[icd @wan0net]

@grandMa5ter @Asher_Wolf I’d also suggest that if anyone has a significant number of data scientists, and a clear view of ethics that is bound by law, it’s them.

[icd @wan0net]

@raymatp07 @InsiderPhD You said the above as a bad example, but I think there are benefits.

It's also funny that you call it absurd which is kinda of the behaviour that was being called out through the idea. You can give an opinion on an idea in a constructive way.

[icd @wan0net]

@_sarahyo I really wish they'd come up with another term for it.

[icd @wan0net]

https://t.co/OlxVsFx6tF #wasntaphasemom

[icd @wan0net]

@gregdotexe Having the same problem