Yeah, I did that. I also shut down all of the free mapping teaching.
This stuff was increadibly draining as I was hoping it will become sustainable for far too long.
At least, I have got some clarity and free cycles to think about other things.
@joa_pen@swardley@u3m Fair point, but you are also a seasoned mapper who had plenty of time to make up his mind.
Newcomers see @swardley's statement sooner or later.
@joa_pen@swardley@u3m ...means there is no imperative to learn maps in a number of situations, like you being a consultant, or you collaborating with good consultants.
which is hard to accept, because consultants are using maping to do some good :).
@joa_pen@swardley@u3m Your statement is fine :).
I am saying something slightly different - current imperative wording says that mapping is for you if you feel enslaved by consultants.
With Simon's additional explanation, there is no need to rebel if you do not feel enslaved.
Which also...
@swardley@u3m I need confirmation if my understanding is correct.
are you saying that mapping has no imperative for people who do not feel enslaved by consultants (f.e. see value in consultant's work or are consultants themselves) ?
@swardley Nomadic cultures relied less on labour - their property customs were very different. Yet, the're a minority right now. Which means that somehow property-based approach was better suited for (at least short-term) evolutionary success.
@swardley Elysium is a likely outcome, though. Possibly terrible outcome for humanity... but individuals will not see it as such, due to some things being seen as 'impossible'. And Matt Damon will not save us.
@swardley ... are basically the foundation on which a lot of other things have been built. Even CC-BY-SA is a continuation of the 'right to harvest' :D.