It is sad to see people actually thinking that Steve Hilton can win the governorship, or Spencer Pratt can win the mayoral election in Los Angeles.
They don't understand California politics.
Let me tell you two sad facts: neither thing can happen.
Joseph Stalin once said words to the effect that the people who vote don't determine elections. The people that count the votes determine elections.
But there's more than that in California, and Stalin would have been amazed if he had seen how this state has rigged elections.
If everyone in the state voted for Hilton, and everyone in LA voted for Pratt, both would still lose. You think I'm exaggerating?
Here's how Democrats have rigged the system. In California, every registered voter, alive or dead, legal or illegal, still in district or not, gets a ballot mailed to them. Every single one.
In CA, ballot harvesting is legal. Which means the massive Democrat machine sends operatives out to collect those ballots that were sent to people who aren't there, or senile citizens in old folk's homes, or anywhere else they can, and votes them for Democrats.
Then, they dump those ballots into the conveniently placed collection boxes that are all around the state, so the scammers don't have to go very far to drop them off. No need to actually pay for postage. Nope. Just drop them off.
Then there's the fact that any ballot received within seven days after an election gets counted. If the Democrats need a little push, they just put those pre-postmarked ballots into the post office box, and they get sent to arrive in time to change the election results.
The real problem is that there is no low-level Republican effort to rebuild Republican presence from the bottom up. The CA Republican party is a bunch of elite do-nothings who ask for money and then use that money for 'election events' like dinners, flights around everywhere, and pontifications. They're as big a bunch of grifters as Democrats are. They just have less power.
So before you all go "Rah Rah!!! We're going to win!!!" Realize that not only is the deck stacked against Republicans, but the order of the cards in the deck are already determined.
The winner of the California gubernatorial race will be whichever Democrat gets on the general election ballot. And the winner of the LA Mayor's race will be Karen Bass.
Not because the people voted for them. But because it's the Democrat machine that "counts the votes."
Well somebody said what she said. And what she said isn't wrong.
How many more videos do you have to see of people like Ilhan preaching allegiance to their home countries? Or Rashida calling our American government genocide mother f*ckers and she along with others aren't going anywhere?
How about the Uk falling to m*slim rule? Or certain American cities having to listen to m*slim prayer?
There is no peace with people who want to conquer you.
@Tim_Walz I find it interesting how our country survived 200+ years without the Dept of Uneducation, but getting rid of it now is going to make us "stupider"? 🤣🤣
All depends on how you ask the question, now doesn't it.
Per Grok: Did the Nazis disarm German citizens?
The Nazis did not completely disarm German citizens, but they did implement strict gun control measures that significantly restricted access to firearms, particularly for certain groups, while favoring those loyal to the regime. Here’s a breakdown based on historical evidence:
Before the Nazis came to power in 1933, Germany already had relatively strict gun laws under the Weimar Republic. The 1919 Treaty of Versailles, imposed after World War I, banned military-style weapons and required civilians to surrender them. The 1928 Law on Firearms and Ammunition further tightened control, requiring licenses for acquiring and carrying firearms, and mandating registration with the police.
When the Nazis took over, they built on this framework. On March 18, 1938, they passed the German Weapons Act (Waffengesetz), which deregulated some aspects for Nazi supporters but tightened restrictions for others. Key points:
It lowered the legal age for gun ownership from 20 to 18 and extended permit validity from one to three years—for those deemed "reliable" by the regime.
It exempted Nazi Party members, military personnel, and government officials from many restrictions, effectively arming their supporters.
It banned Jews and other "undesirables" (e.g., Roma, political dissidents) from owning firearms entirely. This was reinforced by a November 11, 1938, decree following Kristallnacht, explicitly prohibiting Jews from possessing any weapons, including guns, knives, or ammunition.
The Nazis also conducted confiscation campaigns. In the early years, they targeted political opponents—communists, socialists, and trade unionists—seizing weapons during raids. After 1938, Jews were systematically disarmed; failure to comply often led to arrest or execution. Gestapo records and survivor accounts document house searches and weapon seizures in Jewish communities.
However, the broader German population—those not targeted as enemies of the state—could still own firearms if they met the regime’s criteria (e.g., loyalty, no criminal record). Hunting rifles and shotguns were less restricted than handguns, which required stricter permits. The Nazis even encouraged marksmanship through organizations like the Hitler Youth, though this was tightly controlled and tied to militarization efforts.
Propaganda played a role too. The regime framed gun control as a way to "restore order" after the chaos of the Weimar years, while quietly ensuring that only their supporters stayed armed. By 1939, with war underway, civilian gun ownership became less relevant as resources shifted to the military.
So, no, the Nazis didn’t disarm all German citizens—they disarmed their enemies while keeping loyalists armed. It was selective control, not a blanket ban
@WallStreetApes You are absolutely correct!!
It is estimated, a staggering 20-30 million working Americans are in financial trouble, fighting directly with or on payment plans for back taxes of some sort.
That statistic is "every year" and has only been increasing over the last few decades. 😠
This post has 115,000+ Likes
Americans are OUTRAGED over what DOGE is finding our tax dollars being spent on
“I'm done. I don't care — I am no longer a piggy bank for the United States Federal Government. Period. You hear me, I am no longer a piggy bank for them. I am done. I can't physically or mentally hear of another post on X or another press release in the news about how DOGE is uncovered.”
“Are you kidding me right now? Because I know you out there have a story where the IRS either attached your wages, seized your assets, like where the government has done something to you, where they came after you for more money when you are already paying through the freaking nose.
Okay, and all of these Congress people that do all of this insider trading and stuff, no. They're sitting in plushy mansions, not paying a percentage of the taxes that we pay out here. And I'm in my trailer.”
“I don't wanna be a piggy bank for the federal government any longer, and you shouldn't either. We should be in the streets right now, protesting and demanding a damn tax halt, a tax halt. And I don't care if the states suffer. I don't care if the federal government suffers because what I found out they're doing with my tax dollars, they're doing a study on garment workers in India to see if they're sad.
And I am wondering what I can go without it this week. Groceries or gas? No. I am not a piggy bank for the federal government anymore, and you should feel the same damn way out there. I can't hear it anymore.”
This whole video is EXACTLY how we all feel