@CricCrazyJohns I've got it! New Law. If the non-striker leaves the crease prior to release then the bowler cannot be called for a no-ball. This will force the non-striker to stay his ground every ball. If he doesn't then a free hit and/or wicket is still valid even when the bowler oversteps
@guthers102@PiersUncensored@GeoffreyBoycott@piersmorgan@TalkTV If it's dead ball when it enters keepers gloves, then how can we ever have a stumping? That's what gets me with all this. They say Bairstow wasn't walking out of his crease to gain any advantage yet it's ok to stump someone who overbalances and lifts their back foot?!?
@GerardWhateley The fact is, if the cameras are recording "in sync" (which I suspect they are) then if the single frame that shows the ball above the post from one angle is replicated at the same moment in time from an alternate angle then it's safe to say the ball passed directly above the post
@Matt_H_Sullivan just read your story on Warner & Afridi. Did you realise that if you look carefully Warner actually sends him a kiss thru the grille, a true bromance π€£
@NBA I think this is amazing. Might look a bit crap at the moment, but imagine using this tech with VR. You could effectively watch the game be played around you live!
@parklanedriving@GerardWhateley Iβm just thinking if we want to reduce the likelihood of players colliding like this, the rules should protect a player who is moving in the direction of the balls motion.
@GerardWhateley hey Gerard, Iβve been watching the Mackay bump over and over and canβt stop thinking, can the tribunal take into account the direction the ball is moving when contact is made? The player moving in the direction of the ball should be protected, then other players