Under the pretext of banning under-16s from social media to “protect the children,” Keir Starmer has snuck in some small print that should make Americans really glad that all the tea was dumped into the Boston harbour back in 1773.
Adults will still be “allowed” to use the platforms… once they’ve handed over facial recognition, digital ID, passport, or credit card details to prove they’re not a child.
So it was never really about the kids. It was about making sure every single person who wants to speak online has to first tell the government exactly who they are.
Step 1: Link your real identity to your speech
Step 2: police have a lovely searchable database of every spicy take, meme, or complaint you’ve ever posted
Step 3: bring in the consequences - arrests, travel ban, debunking, for out-of-bounds speech
The UK is in a free fall.
Keir Starmer’s snap announcement to impose digital id verification on entire nation is unacceptable
We are leafletting in Makerfield & then headed back to London
Let’s make sure we all stand Together on this.
More coming v soon
Pls take & share @Togetherdec No2Id Pledge today 👇
🚨UPDATE : Not only may Keir Starmers social media ban be in breach of Article 8 it may now also be in breach of Article 10 of the ECHR.
And yes the ECHRs rights extends to children.
🚨 STARMER IS NOW BEING CALLED OUT ON THE WORLD STAGE
For years, concerns about mass migration were dismissed as a domestic political issue.
Not anymore.
Nile Gardiner argues that Donald Trump is right to speak out because what is happening in Britain and Europe affects the future of the entire Western world.
The significance of this moment is not simply the criticism of Keir Starmer.
It is the fact that Britain's migration policies are now being debated far beyond Westminster.
What was once dismissed as a local issue is rapidly becoming an international one.
And the scrutiny is only increasing.
🗣️ Elon Musk s’exprime après que plusieurs Européens dont la France et le Royaume-Uni aient décidé d’interdire les réseaux sociaux au moins de 16 ans :
« Cette loi sur la censure est un loup dans la peau d'un agneau. Le véritable objectif est de permettre aux gouvernements de tracer tout le monde. »
I don't mean to sound hysterical, but it's exceedingly obvious that the social media ban, the PA proscription, and the assisted dying bill are all unified moves by a government with no intention of bettering people's lives, only snuffing out dissent.
Starmer’s ban on social media isn’t a ban for 17 year olds and below.
It’s a ban for the entire population, until you identify yourself and link your social media to your ID.
It was never about protecting children.
BBC have said that RUSSIA orchestrated an Arson attack against the prime minister, so with that being said…..you can pretty much guarantee that RUSSIA had nothing to do with it.
Other parents: “Thank God Keir Starmer has banned social media and YouTube for under-16s. Best thing he’s ever done.”
Me, fully awake:
“Don’t worry kids, I’ve got the VPN ready.”
My children belong to me. Not the state.
And that is non-negotiable.
Starmer: We want to digitally ID everyone who uses social media
Brits: Absolutely Not!
Starmer: OK then, we want to ban under 16s from social media (by digitally ID-ing everyone)
Brits: OMG that’s a great idea. Idk what idiot would be against that 🥴
I'm actually shocked at how fucking naive people are.
You would have thought after Covid people would have woken up to what is actually going on all across the globe.
Lock step surveillance and state control.
Covid was an intelligence test.
Half of you cunts are cabbages🫵