नितिन जी, 2014 का सुनामी याद है — मोदी जी का चेहरा हर पोस्टर पर था और लोगों ने उसी के नाम पर वोट दिया। बस एक छोटा सा संवैधानिक फुटनोट: वोट सीधे प्रधानमंत्री को नहीं, लोकसभा के सांसद को जाता है, फिर बहुमत वाली पार्टी का नेता प्रधानमंत्री बनता है। “सीधे जनादेश” वाली लाइन मार्केटिंग में जबरदस्त लगी, सिविक्स क्लास में थोड़ी क्रिएटिव 😄
वैसे 25 साल का ट्रैक रिकॉर्ड अलग बात है — उस पर बहस हो सकती है, “पहला डायरेक्ट पीएम” वाली बात पर हंसी आ जाती है।
Rishi, framing routine strategic frictions as a coordinated US-UK-NATO-Pakistan plot for “regime change” because the current government is supposedly less controllable than Congress is an assertion, not an analysis. Trade disputes, differing views on Pakistan, energy purchases, and alliance expectations are documented features of India’s external relations; treating them as proof of a joint regime-change project collapses distinct actors and motives into one narrative that has not been evidenced by official statements, leaked plans, or consistent policy. Pakistan’s adversarial posture is longstanding and separate from Western partnership calculations, which continue to include defence cooperation, technology ties, and diplomatic engagement even amid public criticism. Claims of this scale warrant specific, verifiable indicators rather than the inference that disagreement equals a desire to install a more pliable government.
It has become crystal clear now, this is IAC 2.0. All ousted members of version 1.0 trying their luck in the next edition.
These privileged brats, are being projected as future leaders, while they are the members of a so called pressure group, CJP.
This time we do not speculate who the sponsors of this alleged pressure group are or, do we?