Flavio Bolsonaro's passport was cancelled and he was forced to flee the country by Lula, Alexandre De Moraes, and the insane Brazilian regime.
His brother Eduardo has an arrest warrant out for lobbying the US. His father, Jair Bolsonaro is serving 27 years. Victims of political persecution, all of them.
It's time for the Brazilian left to face the full force of American diplomatic and economic sanctions until they stop acting like a banana republic.
The Trump administration lifted Magnitsky Act sanctions on de Moraes, his wife, and his holding company last December. They should be immediately reimposed.
Further, visa bans should be imposed on every government official who has touched the Bolsonaro investigations - and their families too.
Finally, Section 301 tariffs on Brazilian goods should be quadrupled.
The Brazilian regime should look carefully at what has happened to Venezuela and Cuba, and remember that this hemisphere belongs to the United States of America.
🚨@DataRepublican has been documenting the network discussing a “Fourth Founding,” with a political crisis potentially creating an opening for major structural reform.
I have been reviewing the Democracy Files exposed by @DataRepublican, @SKDoubleDub33, and @iamlisalogan. While going through them, I stumbled upon this document.
It matters because it shows what one possible legal vehicle looks like.
It is a ready made “Emergency Application” for a state legislature to invoke Article V:
“Be it resolved by the legislature of the State of ______”
If 34 state legislatures submit qualifying applications, Congress must call a convention to propose constitutional amendments. Any amendment would still need approval from 38 states.
The draft proposes changes involving federal power, spending, term limits, checks and balances, and Citizens’ Assemblies.
It also says convention delegates would be elected by popular vote, instructed through state Citizens’ Assemblies, and subject to immediate recall if they departed from their mandate.
No Article V convention has taken place, and the Constitution does not answer many of the procedural questions raised by this proposal.
An attached comment then suggests launching a January 2026 campaign for an Article VII “National Citizens’ and Constitutional Convention.”
That creates an even larger legal question..
Article VII was used to ratify the Constitution written in 1787. It does not provide a modern process for calling another convention or replacing the current Constitution.
This document adds an important piece to what @DataRepublican has been reporting.
The “Fourth Founding” discussion was not limited to just rhetoric about a future crisis. The documents include reusable legislative language for opening the constitutional amendment process, along with comments exploring an “Article VII” route that the Constitution does not actually provide.
Here’s my gift for the day. She thinks having sex with a 9 year old is DISGUSTING when she thinks Trump did it; runs away when she finds out it was Muhammad.