@Snt_Mikael@MoFoxxies There's nothing wrong with using AI for fun to make things most people couldn't otherwise make. People have fun and you wouldn't even need to argue if people agreed with you by default. Demanding people learn niche high-end skills and/or invest thousands of hours is unreasonable.
@FiadhBaikal There are artists out there taking commissions, well-known artists who charge a lot, and use AI to make the artwork. They just don't tell you that they're doing so.
@MoFoxxies@6Hell6Fire6Joe6 Artists saying "don't use my art for AI training data" doesn't actually legally bind anyone to anything. It's not much different than saying people aren't allowed to study your drawings and eyeball it while drawing as a reference. People simply have a right to transformative art.
@FountainCartoon@MoFoxxies By the way, John, this idea that because you 'feel' things while making art and therefore AI can't replicate that because AI has no feelings is essentially a spiritual argument. That's not a rational position. That's not a real argument.
@FountainCartoon@MoFoxxies Do you repeatedly say that? Good for you, but generally all I see is you typing in all caps and acting like a bit of a baby. In regards to what you said, you're simply wrong. You can have an incorrect opinion, but no one has to agree with you, respect it, or acknowledge it.