@dcinvestor If anything, this means the well funded games with a head start now are more likely to maintain that head start as the big company competitors remain stubbornly sidelined.
Looking at you @Gfunkera86 @MetaHero_
@hero_truck@tropoFarmer@beaniemaxi@0xHelix@DeezeFi@AnonymiceNFT What clear pump and dump? It was a stealth mint and no devs have sold anything. Contract got sniffed out by soleus group and a bunch of other cynical profiteering mev types when the devmints sent tx on contract. Was an open mint at 1 per tx though and the whole world knew.
@hero_truck@tropoFarmer@beaniemaxi@0xHelix@DeezeFi@AnonymiceNFT The art stands out first and foremost, but it's a subjective take so not really sure how much we want to belabor this. My point was more so regarding the perception of it being high effort, which is why it caused backlash other forks didn't see at all.
@alfgandeth @tropoFarmer@beaniemaxi@0xHelix@DeezeFi@AnonymiceNFT If it doesn't fulfill itself as "higher effort" then it will fade away and the issues the mice holders are panicking about solve themselves. They're only complaining and coming up with reasoning pretzels because they see it as a threat. Maybe it will merit that, maybe not.
@tropoFarmer@beaniemaxi@DeezeFi@AnonymiceNFT If Mice are a good project it grows from this. If pandas are a low effort fork, it will fade. Or maybe there's healthy competition? The market decides. But nothing unethical here even if they're mad. People can just be wrong sometimes. Helpful to take a step back often.
@tropoFarmer@beaniemaxi@DeezeFi@AnonymiceNFT The creators have a biased perspective and in my opinion are having a bit of a knee jerk bad reaction here. This is how open source works. This is how decentralization works. This isn't a thread to them if their project and community is sound. Should be seen as flattery.