@PataalPuri@historiakayasth patliputra was the capital of Guptas as mentioned in prayag prathisthi of samudragupta.
Pushpa was another name of patliputra
@Aindradeva Not true,it is clearly mentioned in prayag prathisthi of samudragupta that he lives in city of puspa which was the name of patliputra.
Samudragupta never shifted his capital to ayodhya it was most likely shifted by skandagupta after a flood in patliputra.
@HimalyatoA@GenZKaoboy Buddy, not every kshatriya was a royal one.
And not every kshatriya was a king.
He could have been a shepherd boy while being a kshatriya.
@Kartikey_9730@Rai_Bahadur1915@Aindradeva No proof of that.
Most historians agree of them being a magadh based dynasty originating from lower magadh region not Eastern UP.
SR goyal just concluded Eastern UP being Gupta's dynasty origin Homeland on provenance of coin hoards that's not how you know origin of a dynasty
@ricoRod1990 Chamar, then why weren't you able to protect yourself from us invaders and oppression for 5000 years while being natives of this land.
You subhumans chamars are from Africa.
Imagine being oppressed for 1000 of years and what's stopping you chamars from qualifying in FIFA.
@N46861@Faustiankiss Chamar,2% of population oppressed your subhuman race for 5000 years. We don't need you ugly subhumans in hinduism.
Chal jaa nahi toh yahi par tera niyog start kar dunga.
@Kar_Bharadwaj@SomaariSiddha Kuntala was a Vedic janapada established by sanskrit speakers they spoke prakrit/sanskrit not Kannada.
Only the common people who live in that region would have spoke kannada not the people or elites who established kuntala kingdom
The word kuntala itself is of Sanskrit origin.