@RachelMaddiso15 This to anyone with medical qualifications has been evident since reporting restrictions lifted - not all doctors are like this in fact 99% aren’t !
@EruthmaEruthmas@mervynpervyn Why the surprise ? Once reporting restrictions lifted the medical community realised how utterly ridiculous the “ medical evidence” was …..no first year medical student would accept the “facts” put forward !
@saintant@MartynPitman Ok
Name a credible medical fact that is regarded as mainstream normal medicine that resulted in a conviction - await with bated breath !
@saintant@MartynPitman Surely you should have read and had someone explain the factual medical details to you by now - you are now just embarrassing yourself.
@Corvid19__@DebRoberts22249@ContrarianJolly@jontay44@PaulBut38752753@drpaulclarke One thing I’ve learnt over last 18/24 months - Debz is 100% not one person. Her timeline of posts makes it impossible to be one - and pin her down on medical detail and “she” drowns. That account has ulterior motives. I’ve been blocked - in time hope the real identity is known !
@kerrydixon21@WndyAilson@RTEsoccer Ah he must be eating then - classic answer when disagreeing and unscented of the truth. It’s classic Zionist thinking !
@wesstreeting Do you agree with the Professor of Genocide studies in the Hebrew university of Jerusalem re his opinion on the undoubted genocide in Gaza ….. or that doesn’t fit with your sponsors 🤔
@reasonoverfear@Overlordmainst1 Air is also a recognised normal finding post mortem - hence why the words of the radiologist (one of experts) should be read slowly and very carefully.
@TobeHon29809726 Seems one of them didn’t believe in this ridiculous theory - at least showing some degree of clinical acumen far more than his colleagues and the “expert”
@saintant@RowdyKate2@sarahknapton Consistent but not diagnostic - read the words. Air in tissue is normal post mortem finding. Read the radiologists words carefully!
@PaulBut38752753 It seems the basic science / pharmokinetics is just too difficult for you to understand. You are now reverting to “type” with your answers like snowdon and Debz when the science doesn’t fit with your view. Hard I know for you but sometimes science is like that !