BREAKING: London’s Nova exhibition to commemorate the Jewish kids massacred on October 7th was removed per police request.
The Met police asked the organizers to take the sign down out of fear of terror attacks on the exhibition.
So grim.
How intriguing that you’ve chosen not to post guidance like this before the numerous hate marches we’ve seen in London - all of which have involved antisemitic chants, slogans, symbols and banners.
Two tier policing at its finest.
Western society is currently divided between people who know this is a man and are prepared to say so and those who know this is a man but lie out of obedience to an ideology. There is no third option. Literally nobody on earth thinks "Roxanne Tickle" is actually a woman.
Not a word from Starmer about the same day's proposed "Nakba" march, which incites murderous hatred and division by perpetrating the big lie that the Jews dispossessed the "indigenous Palestinians" to create Israel.
It sounds very much,reading between the lines, that Keir Starmer is gearing up for a Southport 2 in as far as fast track punishments are concerned sadly he has completely failed to read the room and acknowledge where the real problems lie
Andy Burnham is a full-blown gender ideologue.
As Mayor of Manchester, he oversaw £100,000 of funding for an organisation helping children to get puberty blockers.
He also criticised the Supreme Court judgment on biological sex.
Labour cannot be trusted on child safeguarding.
It’s unfortunate that this statement from the Bar Council mentions a barrister’s duty to represent a client fearlessly but not a barrister’s duty to uphold the rule of law. The judge in this case had expressly directed that counsel were not to tell the jury that they were free to disregard his directions of law. The barrister allegedly - and at this stage this is just an allegation - did exactly what the judge had ruled that he must not do. All the Court of Appeal has done is to hold that the procedure the judge adopted to deal with this possible contempt was wrong. It has returned the matter to the judge for him to take forward under the correct procedure, if he sees fit. It is hardly appropriate for the Bar Council to be pronouncing at this stage that the matter should be at an end.
Dear @nytimes
Remember when you put a sick child with Cerebral Palsy on your front page - and falsely claimed he was a healthy child deliberately starved by Israel?
I was the one who uncovered the truth.
So excuse me if I don't believe a word you write.
‘A young Jewish woman was pressured by her CEO to accept being assigned a non-Jewish name at work, in the directory, email & office interactions to avoid offending clients. In Australia, where a trans person’s chosen gender & chosen name must be accepted to avoid offence. If I live to be 100 I will not get over today’s testimony.’
These are the words of one of our Australian followers in response to yesterday’s hearing of the Australian Royal Commission on Antisemitism. She adds, ‘I tried imagining the fallout if anyone had told India Willoughby that he had to use his male name. Then I realised I didn't have the brain capacity to hold the hypocrisy & insanity of both these things.’
One minority is expected to erase itself to avoid offence, while another is protected from offence by institutional force. That is a profound double standard. We say: antisemitism is not a burden for Jews to manage, but an entrenched conspiracy theory that society must confront.
Marrying again, while already married is a crime called bigamy
It is found in section 57 of the Offences against the Person Act 1861 - punishment is upto 7 years in prison
This is also incredibly stupid.
Husbands with second, third and even fourth wives living in the UK have had their benefits allowance increased by the Department for Work and Pensions. https://t.co/aHQBVlGUon