@Pistachi0_x @GenesysGo Sounds good will add a little more. I agree mostly market conditions... but situations like this I am starting to see the value of investor lockup periods
@solomonyun1 @wei_sol_ @bonfida I don't see how that would be possible. They have the ability to repoint a .sol domain to another address which is a lot different than sending other tokens out of your wallet
@jaakoo_ nice call on these...its rare to see a non pump and dump call i.e someone sees an established project is undervalued and loads up without front running anyone..congrats
@RuggedNick Not sure why projects need it when magic eden is cheaper on launchpad route, and candy machine 2 is an easy setup. I wouldn't count on 18 sol a month that's for sure
@SolNFTs I would assume the funds get divided up per mint transaction, so ME works get their 10% or whatever, but if they refund 100% they would lose money on that project (nobody is crying to hard for them)
@SolportTom Interesting idea but if the project is truly rugged you won't have the update authority to change the metadata. Maybe in that case a token swap that was respected by the market places as the new collection
@sp00n1cus People need to stop aping into "game" NFTs based on a trailer. Game dev is really hard. I still think the easier play is to take an existing game and add NFT support for buying weapons and skins etc
@arpitsheth It should but doesn't appear to be happening.... It's almost like everyone is just jumping on new projects for a quick flip and forgetting about existing ones ๐ค