@T_J_Carroll@davidjohnsonTF So according to the actual rule, the only thing stipulated is due to a faulty action of the starting stalls , which yesterday wasnt . But because they've said "including but no limited to" , they can just make up whatever rule they want. Absolute farce.
@mp_horseracing@RacingPost@ACooperClerk@EpsomRacecourse So the ground was good to soft Wednesday, then yesterday after it got rain it improved to good ! And now this morning after a dry day yesterday its gone back to good to soft?🤣🤣🤣🤣
@brodders_be He did try and get him up near the lead. Horse was ridden aggressively coming out of the stalls to try and get a positionand wouldnt go forward for him. Horse wasnt at it from word go.
@GingerJoeRacing@OddsCheckrTrack So are you saying oddscheckere p/l for you is false? Nothing against you, the game is the game and p/l can wildly fluctuate for anyone over a period of time. But its a disgrace if oddschecker are falsifying p/l .
@GingerJoeRacing@BensBetsOnX@DFrankcom Id love to know how you knew he was average compared to other jockies on the list when it was a BLIND ranking and you didnt know what jockies were going to pop up?
@rcor96@BensBetsOnX@DFrankcom Look at his comments underneath 🤣 he only said he was average compared to other jockies on the list, goes into say it was a blind ranking , so id love to know how he knew he was average compared to jockeys he didnt know 🤣